Theology Social Justice Paper
|
Criteria |
Unsatisfactory (F) |
Passing (D) |
Adequate/Average (C) |
Good (B) |
Superior (A) |
|
Organization, Cohesiveness, Readability (20 Points) |
No thesis, lacking even minimal structure, such as paragraphs and/or no consistent line of thought or logical connection between different parts of the essay. Poorly written. (0-10 points) |
No thesis; only minimal structure, such as paragraphs, but logical connection between them is weak. (13 points) |
Implicit or unclear thesis; some deficiency in unity and logical progression or connection of thoughts between and within paragraphs; the relation of all parts of the work to the central argument or thesis may be unclear. Style of writing is too colloquial/obscure. Vocabulary and style is redundant throughout the paper. (15 points) |
Clearly stated thesis; clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Vocabulary and style is not always varied. (17 points) |
Clearly stated and well-formulated thesis that is easy to find; logical progression of ideas between and within paragraphs; seamless transitions. Clear and concise prose; vocab and style are varied. (20 points) |
|
Logic, Support, and Argumentation (30 Points) |
No claims made in the body of the paper are supported by reason or evidence. (0-15 points) |
Minimal attempt to support claims w reason and evidence. (20 points) |
Some claims made in the body of the paper are supported by reason and evidence. (22 points) |
Most claims in the body of the paper are supported by reason and evidence. (25 points) |
Claims made in the body of the paper are supported by reason and evidence. (30 points) |
|
Depth of Discussion (30 Points) |
Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections (0-15 points) |
Cursory discussion in many sections of the paper; significant omissions, major inaccuracies. (20 points) |
Pertinent content omitted, content runs-on excessively, or major inaccuracies. Some aspects of topic not addressed, no synthesis, only a few examples/arguments are explained (22 points) |
In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper. Most aspects of the topics are addressed, some attempt at connections is made, most examples/ arguments are well explained (25 points) |
In-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper. All aspects of the topic are addressed, connections made between ideas, and all examples/ arguments are well explained (30 points) |
|
Spelling and Grammar (20 Points) |
Grammatical errors severely obscure meaning (0-10 points) |
Major and/or numerous grammatical mistakes. (13 points) |
Several minor grammatical errors, one or two major errors. (15) |
Only a few minor grammatical errors. (17 points) |
No spelling or grammatical errors (20 points) |