First Revision

3/5/2021 First Revision Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/WRIT/WRIT6088/201000/Scoring_Guides/u08a1_scoring_guide.html 1/1

First Revision Scoring Guide

Due Date: Unit 8 Percentage of Course Grade: 5%.

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Assess whether or not the paper adequately integrates the topic with the literature review.

18%

Does not assess whether or not the paper adequately integrates the topic with the literature review.

Assesses whether or not the paper adequately integrates the topic with the literature review, but the conclusion is unclear.

Assesses whether or not the paper adequately integrates the topic with the literature review.

Comprehensively assesses whether or not the paper adequately integrates the topic with the literature review.

Assess how the paper is organized in terms of how the argument flows from one point to the next.

17%

Does not assess how the paper is organized in terms of how the argument flows from one point to the next.

Assesses how the paper is organized in terms of how the argument flows from one point to the next, but does not address all points.

Assesses how the paper is organized in terms of how the argument flows from one point to the next.

Assesses, in a comprehensive fashion, how the paper is organized in terms of how the argument flows from one point to the next.

Assess how the paper is organized in terms of how the chunks of evidence are grouped together.

17%

Does not assess how the paper is organized in terms of how the chunks of evidence are grouped together and the order in which those groups appear.

Assesses how the paper is organized in terms of how the chunks of evidence are grouped together, but does not address the full grouping.

Assesses how the paper is organized in terms of how the chunks of evidence are grouped together.

Assesses, in comprehensive fashion, how the paper is organized in terms of how the chunks of evidence are grouped together and the order in which those groups appear.

Assess whether or not evidence is presented clearly.

16%

Does not assess whether or not evidence is presented clearly.

Assesses whether or not evidence is presented clearly, but does not cover all evidence.

Assesses whether or not evidence is presented clearly.

Assesses, in comprehensive fashion, whether or not evidence is presented clearly.

Suggest appropriate changes to address the identified revision issues.

16%

Does not suggest appropriate changes to address the identified revision issues.

Suggests some changes to address the identified revision issues, or suggestions do not address identified issues.

Suggests appropriate changes to address the identified revision issues.

Suggests specific and appropriate changes to address the identified revision issues.

Provide a complete representation of your paper's argument

16%

Does not provide a complete representation of the paper's argument.

Provides an incomplete or flawed representation of the paper's argument.

Provides a complete representation of the paper's argument.

Provides a comprehensively complete representation of the paper's argument.