Business Law
First Assessment
This is an individual piece of coursework worth 40% of the
unit mark
Please read the following instructions before beginning to answer to the
questions on pages 17 - 18
HAND IN DATE This coursework must be submitted via Turnitin
by 23.55, 12TH January 2018. You will find the
dropbox called January Coursework
Submission by clicking on Coursework in the
menu at the top of this Unit’s Moodle site.
It is crucial you include your student ID
number in the file name
Before submission students are
encouraged to submit draft work through
the Turnitin student checkpoints to check
for plagarism
There are mark penalties for late submission
see page 34 in the Unit handbook
FONT + LINE SPACING Coursework should be word processed. Font
size should be between 11 and 14 and
‘easy to read’ e.g. calibri, arial, times new
roman. Line spacing should be between 1.5
and 2 with (approx.) 4 cm margins all
round. The Header must include the
student number and the Footer must
include a page number
WORD LIMIT 1500 words excluding footnotes and bibliography. The word count should be clearly stated on the first page of your answer. Failure to state a word count will result in a penalty of 5% of the original mark awarded. A falsely
stated word-count is an assessment offence which may result in a penalty, including the reduction of the mark to 0%. Note, that footnotes should be used to reference sources only. Markers are free to disregard footnotes that contain inappropriate information or information that should belong in the main text. Coursework that is over the stated word limit will result in a penalty of 10% of the original mark awarded. For the avoidance of doubt, the penalty will be applied to any work that exceeds the stated word limit of 1500 words excluding footnotes and bibliography. Students are NOT permitted to exceed the word limit by 10% or any other amount.
MARKS University Regulations stipulate marking be done 20 working days after 12th January 2018. Marks will be released to you on 9th February. FEEDBACK Personal feedback for guidance on progress
and understanding will be given on each
marked script. Additionally an outline answer to
the coursework questions and generic feedback
will be on Moodle at the end of February 2018.
Informal feedback will also be given in seminars
once marks have been released
Learning Outcomes This coursework covers the following learning
outcomes:
1.Demonstrate a detailed knowledge of the law
and practice in key areas of contract law and
the law of negligence;
2.Recognise, understand and apply appropriate
case law and legislation to realistic business
problem scenarios;
3.Critically evaluate the law of contract and
negligence.
FOOTNOTES Should be used to reference sources.
REFERENCING Referencing is required to give intellectual credit
to your source, helps the marker recover your
source easily and avoids you being accused of
plagiarism.
Students must reference sources using the
Oxford Standard for the Citation of Legal
Authorities (OSCOLA). Details of this can be
found on pages 23 - 25
Students should ensure all sources are
fully cited in footnotes and in their
bibliography in accordance with OSCOLA and
that indentation or quotation marks (as
appropriate) are used when quoting.
Students who fail to include a bibliography
will be penalised likewise poor citation of
sources will result in a loss of marks.
Guidance on referencing maybe found at
Reference should be made to the primary
source, except when the primary source can no
longer be obtained.
PLAGIARISM Students are reminded of the need to avoid
plagiarism. The University Regulations
describe plagiarism as:-
“The incorporation by a student in work for
assessment of material which is not their own,
in the sense that all or a substantial part of the
work has been copied without any adequate
attempt at attribution, or has been incorporated
as if it were the student’s own when in fact
it is wholly or substantially the work of another
person or persons.”
Any student suspected of plagiarism will be
referred to the Student Assessment &
Assessment Regulations Lead and an
Academic Misconduct Hearing will be arranged
with all appropriate penalties applied if
misconduct is found.
Students are reminded that the University will
not tolerate academic dishonesty in any form.
This is cheating. For further guidance see
Student Handbook pages 8 and 9:
http://www.port.ac.uk/accesstoinformation/policies/teachingandlearning/filetodownload,7345
2,en.pdf
If any student has a query about any of the
above points and wishes to obtain clarification
or further information please contact the unit co-
ordinator or your seminar tutor
Electronic Copy of Work Students should retain an electronic copy of their coursework including all drafts, so that any
draft or the submitted answer may be check by
a member of staff should a member of staff feel
the need to do so. Failure to send an electronic
copy of the coursework to a member of staff
who has asked for a copy may result in a
penalty.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA - Please see page 32 -33 in the Handbook.
Please read the case study below and answer the 2 questions
at the end
On Saturday Fernando sees an advertisement in the local paper:
First edition of Lord of the Rings, signed by JRR Tolkien
for sale £7,000. Telephone Simon on 01234 – 60000
or e-mail [email protected]
Fernando, who knows Simon’s address, immediately puts a cheque in the post for
£7,000 together with an additional sum to cover postage and package, with a note
asking Simon to send the book directly to him.
On Sunday evening, upon seeing the advert, Ali e-mails Simon and asks if he will
accept £6,500 for the book. Simon emails back saying that the book is offered for
sale at £7,000 and if Ali wants it he must email him back before 2200. At 2130 Ali
emails Simon back saying he does want to buy it for £7,000 and will put a cheque in
the post to him that evening. This email arrives in Simon’s inbox at 2135 but he
mistakes it for spam and so deletes it without opening it. Ali puts a cheque for
£7,000 in the post that evening.
On Monday morning having heard from no one Simon sells the book for £10,000 to
Gollum Books Ltd. and emails Ali saying the deal is off.
Simon’s wife Fern, runs a coffee bar in Southsea. She goes to Good Buys, the local
supermarket to purchase some coffee for her business and whilst cycling through
Good Buys’ car park she is hit by Joe, a fork lift truck driver working for Good Buys.
Joe has only recently passed his fork lift operating test. As she entered the car park
Fern had seen a notice which stated
Good Buys accepts no responsibility for any loss or
damage to property or persons however arising
Fern is knocked unconscious, gashes her head and damages her bicycle. She was
not wearing a helmet. There is evidence showing Joe was driving too fast and
showing off to his friends.
I. Advise Simon if he has any contractual liability to Fernando and or Ali.
II. Advise Fern on any contractual and/or tortious claims she may have against Joe and/or Good Buys, including a discussion on whether the notice will prevent her making any claim against Good Buys.
Each question is worth 50 marks