journal

finalthesis.pdf

Home >Political Science homework help >journal

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

vii

Table of Contents

Committee Decision ............................................................................................................. ii

Dedication ........................................................................................................................... iii

Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................ v

Publication(s) ...................................................................................................................... vi

Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... vii

List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... xi

List of Figures .................................................................................................................... xii

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................... xiii

Abstract (English) ............................................................................................................. xiv

Abstract (Arabic) ............................................................................................................... xv

Chapter 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 17

1.1 Background of the Study ....................................................................................... 17

1.2 Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................... 19

1.3 Objectives of the Study .......................................................................................... 21

1.4 Research Questions ................................................................................................ 21

1.5 Significance of the Study ....................................................................................... 22

1.6 Scope and Limitations of the Study ....................................................................... 23

1.7 Theoretical Framework .......................................................................................... 24

1.8 Structural Overview ............................................................................................... 25

Chapter 2 Literature review ............................................................................................... 27

2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 27

2.2 Conceptual Foundations of Soft Power ................................................................. 28

2.2.1 Defining Soft Power .................................................................................. 28

2.2.2 Soft Power in Policing: The Gulf Context ................................................. 30

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

viii

2.2.3 Soft Power versus Hard Power and the Rise of Smart Power ................... 31

2.2.4 Soft Power in International Relations Practice .......................................... 33

2.3 Soft Power and Cross-Border Policing Cooperation ............................................. 36

2.3.1 Traditional vs. Informal Mechanisms in International Policing ................ 36

2.3.2 Soft Power and Policing: Dubai’s Initiatives and Regional Context ......... 40

2.3.3 Soft Power Strategies in International Policing ......................................... 43

2.4 Theoretical Framework .......................................................................................... 49

2.5 Gaps in the Literature ............................................................................................. 52

Chapter 3 Methodology ..................................................................................................... 55

3.1 Research Design and Case Selection ..................................................................... 55

3.2 Data Collection and Sources .................................................................................. 57

3.3 Sampling Strategy .................................................................................................. 58

3.4 Data Analysis Plan ................................................................................................. 60

3.5 Trustworthiness and Validity ................................................................................. 62

3.5.1 Credibility .................................................................................................. 62

3.5.2 Dependability ............................................................................................. 62

3.5.3 Confirmability ............................................................................................ 62

3.5.4 Transferability ............................................................................................ 62

3.6 Ethical Considerations ........................................................................................... 63

3.7 Study Limitations ................................................................................................... 64

Chapter 4 Results ............................................................................................................... 66

4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 66

4.2 Participants and Data Corpus ................................................................................. 66

4.3 Theme One: Capability and Fairness as Foundations of Attraction ...................... 68

4.3.1 Illustrative Interview Excerpts ................................................................... 69

4.4 Theme Two: Officer Exchanges and Training as Trust Engines ........................... 69

4.4.1 Illustrative Interview Excerpts ................................................................... 70

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

4.5 Theme Three: Summits and Informal Agreements as Cooperation Accelerators . 71

4.5.1 Illustrative Interview Excerpts ................................................................... 72

4.6 Theme Four: Governance, Rights, and Data as Legitimacy Multipliers ............... 73

4.6.1 Illustrative Interview Excerpts ................................................................... 74

4.7 Theme Five: Barriers and Enablers in Cross-Border Policing Cooperation .......... 75

4.7.1 Illustrative Interview Excerpts ................................................................... 76

4.8 Dubai and Gulf-Focused Results ........................................................................... 77

4.8.1 Illustrative Interview Excerpts ................................................................... 79

4.9 Cross-Theme Synthesis and Pattern Matrix ........................................................... 79

4.10 Summary of Results ............................................................................................... 81

Chapter 5 Discussion ......................................................................................................... 84

5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 84

5.2 Interpreting Key Findings in Relation to The Research Questions ....................... 85

5.2.1 How Soft Power Strategies Contribute to Cooperation (RQ1) .................. 85

5.2.2 The Role of Officer Exchanges, Training, and Summits (RQ2) ................ 86

5.2.3 Challenges That Hinder Soft Power Approaches (RQ3) ........................... 87

5.2.4 How Organizations Like INTERPOL and Europol Leverage Soft Power

(RQ4) ......................................................................................................... 88

5.2.5 Policy Measures That Enhance Soft Power in Policing (RQ5) ................. 89

5.3 Theoretical Implications ........................................................................................ 90

5.4 Practical and Policy Implications ........................................................................... 91

5.4.1 Design Exchange Ecosystems, Not Single Events .................................... 92

5.4.2 Curate Summits for Operational Outcomes ............................................... 92

5.4.3 Standardize Lawful Early Sharing ............................................................. 93

5.4.4 Use Public Communication as a Trust Signal ............................................ 93

5.4.5 Dubai and Gulf-Specific Recommendations ............................................. 93

5.4.6 Global Relevance for Trust, Governance, and Ethical Policing ................ 94

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

5.5 Methodological Reflections and Source Integration .............................................. 95

5.6 Directions for Future Research .............................................................................. 96

5.7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 98

Chapter 6 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 99

6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 99

6.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 99

6.3 Recommendations ................................................................................................ 102

6.3.1 Build exchange ecosystems rather than isolated courses ......................... 102

6.3.2 Curate summits for operational launch .................................................... 102

6.3.3 Standardize lawful early sharing .............................................................. 103

6.3.4 Supply reliable technical support ............................................................. 103

6.3.5 Use public communication to reinforce trust and legitimacy .................. 103

6.3.6 Develop comprehensive Dubai and Gulf partnership architecture .......... 104

6.3.7 Embed ethical governance in all cooperation mechanisms ..................... 105

6.4 Limitations of the Study ....................................................................................... 105

6.4.1 Empirical Limitations .............................................................................. 105

6.4.2 Theoretical Limitations ............................................................................ 107

6.5 Future Work ......................................................................................................... 108

6.6 Alignment with the Initial Research Plan ............................................................ 110

References ........................................................................................................................ 111

APPENDICES ................................................................................................................. 116

7.1 Appendix A: Interview Questions ....................................................................... 116

7.2 Appendix B: Conceptual Model .......................................................................... 117

7.3 Appendix C: Participant Information Sheet and Consent Form .......................... 118

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

List of Tables Table 3-1: Data Triangulation Overview. ................................................................................ 56

Table 4-1: Participant Overview and Data Sources. ................................................................ 66

Table 4-2: Evidence for Theme One. ....................................................................................... 68

Table 4-3: Reported Exchange and Training Benefits. ............................................................ 70

Table 4-4: Reported Functions of Summits and Informal Arrangements. ............................... 72

Table 4-5: Governance and Rights Elements that Shape Cooperation. ................................... 74

Table 4-6: Reported Barriers and Enablers of Cooperation. .................................................... 75

Table 4-7: Dubai and Gulf-Specific Mechanisms and Outcomes. .......................................... 78

Table 4-8: Theme Alignment with Study Objectives and Research Questions. ...................... 80

Table 4-9: Summary of Soft Power Mechanisms and Cooperation Outcomes. ...................... 83

Table 5-1: Findings to Policy Pipeline. .................................................................................... 95

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

xii

List of Figures Figure 2-1: Conceptual Map. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 51

Figure 2-2: Conceptual model linking capability, legitimacy, and convening power to trust

and cooperation outcomes. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 51

Figure 4-1: Thematic Map of Soft Power Mechanisms in Policing Cooperation. -------------- 77

Figure 5-1: Mechanism Flow from Exchanges, Summits, and Governance to Policy Outputs

and Cooperation Outcomes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 90

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

xiii

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

AI Artificial Intelligence

EU European Union

Eurojust European Union Agency for Criminal Justice

Cooperation

Europol Cooperation European Union Agency for Law Enforcement

FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation

GCC Gulf Cooperation Council

INTERPOL International Criminal Police Organization

JIT Joint Investigation Team

MLAT Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty

NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology

UAE United Arab Emirates

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Chapter 1 Introduction

1.1 Background of the Study According to the definition of Joseph Nye, soft power is the ability of an actor to

determine the preferences and behaviors of others by enhancing attraction, legitimacy,

and persuasion instead of using coercion or material incentives (Nye, 2004). When

applied to policing diplomacy, this means that police agencies establish influence, form

alliances, and gain cooperation by projecting an image of professionalism, ethical

behavior, transparency, and technological expertise in a manner that is plausible and

attractive to foreign partners. Soft power rests on culture, values, and policies that are

seen as legitimate and credible, and it shapes preferences through appeal rather than

inducement (Nye, 2004). While classically an international relations concept, it directly

applies to law enforcement because police organizations, like states, cultivate

attractiveness by showcasing practices that other forces find appealing. When police

admire a partner's professionalism, training standards, or ethical reputation, they become

more willing to answer requests quickly, share intelligence, and coordinate operations

(Fernandes, 2024). In this way, the theory of soft power connects directly to the

mechanics of policing, as cooperation networks thrive on relational capital generated by

attraction and trust. For example, Al Hanaee and Davies (2022) describe how Abu Dhabi

Police placed soft power at the center of police and community relations, using

engagement and transparency strategies to sustain confidence. A police force's

professional esteem built through training standards, procedural justice, and diplomatic

outreach encourages peers to share intelligence and collaborate.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

The United Arab Emirates is a highly relevant and theoretically educative environment

to study policing soft power, having established itself as a prominent global hub for

security cooperation and innovation-driven policymaking. The UAE proactively deploys

its law enforcement institutions as a tool of attraction by investing in modern policing

technologies, capacity-building alliances, multilateral training facilities, and high-profile

international events. These signal reliability, interoperability, and future-oriented

governance to partners across Europe, Africa, Asia, and beyond. Dubai, specifically,

exemplifies this approach as a logistics, aviation, and financial hub that uses major events

to engage diverse populations. Its police agencies regularly participate in professional

summits, host capacity-building courses, and project professional competence and

readiness to cooperate through official media. These habits of reputational capital foster

cooperation with European, African, and Asian counterparts. Moreover, increased

regional travel means informal networks among liaison officers and training alumni

become central to timely case coordination. In this way, Dubai's event diplomacy and

public communications function as public diplomacy for policing, projecting

professionalism and mutuality to foreign colleagues, while remote engagement through

social media supplements face-to-face relationships and sustains trust at a distance.

The policing domain shows this logic in practice through officer exchanges, liaison

networks, joint training academies, multilateral summits, and professional communities

of practice. Such tools establish familiarity, normalization, and institutionalization of

cooperation norms that cannot be achieved through formal treaties alone. Dialogue,

cultural exchange, and long-term relationship-building with foreign professionals

increase state influence, as attraction lowers opposition and reduces cooperation expenses

(Melissen, 2005). Professional long-term relationships involving training and support are

primary tools of strategic competition and collaborative security, as they create networks

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

of alumni and shared practices that endure beyond leadership or policy changes (Mazarr,

2022). In Gulf countries, soft policing initiatives explicitly aim to rebrand security forces

by conveying an improved and locally connected image of agents of coercion at home

and abroad. The United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar have staged global events

and nation-branding campaigns that exemplify this approach. These high-profile efforts

bolster police legitimacy by signaling competence and openness.

However, the cultivation of soft power is not without its contradictions. A nation's

reputation can suffer due to visible displays of hard security; for instance, high-profile

border walls can weaken third-party evaluations of a state, undermining its soft power

and complicating collaboration with neighbors (Mutz & Simmons, 2022). This has

prompted a growing tendency among policing bodies and their government sponsors to

favor smart power mixes that balance plausible security with approaches that retain

attraction and trust (Wilson, 2008).

This image is further amplified through social media. Police agencies increasingly use

official accounts to describe collaborative actions, publicize interactions, and articulate

their values. This information functions as public diplomacy, communicating

professionalism, openness, and mutuality to international colleagues and both domestic

and foreign audiences (Fernandes, 2024). Perceptions of authority, legitimacy, and

cooperation are shaped by curated institutional narration and online exhibitions (Zaiotti,

2023). Thus, communicative practices supplement face-to-face engagement and help

sustain trust across distances.

1.2 Statement of the Problem Although formal legal instruments remain vital, many police partnerships succeed or stall

based on intangible factors that current policy and academic literature address only

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

partially. Existing research on international policing emphasizes treaties, mutual legal

assistance, and organizational mandates, yet it gives limited analytic weight to attraction,

esteem, and trust as causal forces in cooperation. Consequently, the operational

dimension of soft power - how tangible instruments such as joint training, liaison

networks, officer exchanges, and strategic communications generate attraction and

legitimacy in day-to-day cooperative action remains overlooked. Governments often

pursue visible border control and enforcement signaling without systematically assessing

the soft power costs for international relationships, even though evidence shows that

exclusionary symbols can depress a country's reputation and reduce voluntary

collaboration from partners who value openness and fairness (Mutz & Simmons, 2022).

Moreover, soft power scholarship still concentrates predominantly on state-based

diplomacy and cultural projection, paying limited attention to policing institutions as key

sites where soft power is implemented, contested, and potentially reconfigured in

transnational security cooperation. No consolidated framework explains how specific

cooperation and exchange instruments generate soft power in policing, nor can agencies

design these instruments to maximize trust while safeguarding operational security. The

Gulf and Dubai contexts receive little focused treatment despite their strategic importance

as transportation and business hubs that depend on agile cross-border coordination.

Furthermore, the role of institutional social media in professional trust-building remains

undertheorized in policing research, even as digital narratives increasingly shape how

international partners perceive one another. Practitioners lack a coherent template for

incorporating soft power into cross-border policing, and researchers lack comparative

data on which exchange tools are most effective and why. This thesis seals these gaps by

moving the discussion of soft power from abstract state diplomacy into the functions of

transnational policing, providing an empirically based framework for understanding how

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

attraction-based resources operate in actual law enforcement partnerships, with an

enduring focus on the environment of Dubai.

1.3 Objectives of the Study 1. To examine how soft power strategies shape trust, perceived legitimacy, and

patterns of cooperation in cross-border policing.

2. To assess the contribution of training programs, officer exchanges,

innovation-driven practices, and best practice sharing platforms to soft power-

based policing diplomacy.

3. To analyze how informal agreements, liaison networks, and international

policing summits foster long-term collaborative relationships and to identify

key challenges that constrain their effectiveness.

4. To formulate evidence-informed policy recommendations for strengthening

global policing cooperation through strategic soft power initiatives.

1.4 Research Questions 1. How do soft power strategies employed by police agencies shape trust and

perceptions of legitimacy among international partners in cross-border

policing cooperation?

2. In what ways do training programs, officer exchanges, and innovation-driven

best practice platforms enhance cooperative capacity and mutual confidence

in international policing networks?

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

3. How do informal agreements, liaison mechanisms, and policing summits

contribute to sustained collaboration, and what barriers constrain their

effectiveness as soft power tools?

4. What policy and organizational measures can optimize the use of soft power

to strengthen global policing cooperation while reinforcing trust, legitimacy,

and innovation-driven security partnerships?

1.5 Significance of the Study This study makes theoretical, empirical, and practical contributions.

Theoretically, it extends soft power and public diplomacy arguments into the policing

sphere by demonstrating that attraction and esteem operate not only among mass publics

but also within professional communities of practice. The research contributes to

international relations theory by operationalizing soft power in the context of

transnational policing, transforming an abstract concept into concrete, measurable

practices such as training collaborations, liaison networks, and strategic communications.

It bridges classical soft power theory (Nye, 2004) with contemporary public diplomacy

and security cooperation literature to show how non-coercive tools lower transaction costs

and enhance willingness to cooperate. In doing so, it also advances the smart power

argument by illustrating how persuasive and coercive tools can be rationally combined

(Wilson, 2008).

Empirically, the study documents the operation of exchange mechanisms and

institutional discourses in actual policing settings, with a focused examination of the

Dubai context a strategically significant site that remains underexplored in existing

scholarship. As a real-world case study, it offers agencies a practical model for balancing

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

security imperatives with reputational custodianship, demonstrating how soft power

operates in practice rather than merely in theory.

Practically, the findings provide actionable policy directions for governments, regional

bodies, and senior police officers on designing training curricula, officer exchange

programs, informal engagement mechanisms, and communication strategies. By

identifying how soft power resources can be systematically deployed, the study enables

policymakers and police leaders to enhance trust, legitimacy, and long-term coordination

with their international counterparts through evidence-based resource allocation and

program design.

1.6 Scope and Limitations of the Study This thesis has the parameters of inter-border cooperation in policing, which is concerned

with soft power. The collaboration and exchange tools (officer exchange, liaison

networks, joint training, multilateral policing summits, institutional communication) are

the focus of the case study. This analysis uses Dubai and the Gulf as a background to

analyze, and the rest of Europe and Africa as a comparison to understand mechanisms.

The period spanned between the post-Cold War period and the mid-2020s, because the

spread of soft power ideology, the professionalization of global police forces, and the

introduction of digital communications characterized this time.

The study recognizes several limitations. First, soft power outcomes are challenging to

measure precisely because many forces shape perceptions simultaneously, and causality

unfolds over time. Second, access to sensitive operational information may be

constrained, which can limit the depth of some examples. Third, findings emphasize

analytical generalization to theory and practice rather than statistical generalization,

which is appropriate for the qualitative design. Fourth, social media analysis focuses on

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

official and publicly available content and therefore cannot capture confidential dynamics

behind the scenes. These limits are dealt with in the thesis by means of careful

triangulation of interviews and documents, open procedures of analysis, and cautious

interpretation.

1.7 Theoretical Framework This study draws on a synthesis of soft power, public diplomacy, and smart power to

explain how collaboration and exchange generate voluntary cooperation in cross-border

policing.

Soft power, as conceptualized by Joseph Nye (2004), refers to the ability to shape the

preferences of others through attraction and legitimacy rather than coercion or

inducement. In the policing context, this means that agencies can foster cooperation by

projecting professionalism, procedural fairness, and technical expertise that foreign

partners find worthy of emulation and trust.

Public diplomacy extends this logic by specifying the mechanisms through which

attraction is cultivated. Melissen (2005) emphasizes dialogue, relationship-building, and

cultural or professional exchange as tools that create enduring ties. These mechanisms are

directly applicable to policing, where peer-to-peer learning, officer exchanges, and long-

term liaison networks build familiarity and mutual confidence.

Smart power (Wilson, 2008) reconciles the persuasive logic of soft power with the

reality that policing retains a coercive core. It argues that effective strategies combine

hard and soft tools in ways that are mutually reinforcing, ensuring that enforcement

capabilities do not undermine reputational capital. This balance is particularly relevant

for agencies that must project both credible deterrence and attractive partnership.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

The framework is further informed by scholarship on security cooperation. Mazarr (2022)

demonstrates that training, capacity-building, and network creation generate alumni

communities and shared practices that endure beyond political cycles, making

partnerships more resilient and responsive. Finally, Zaiotti (2023) highlights the role of

institutional storytelling and the curation of security imagery in public-facing platforms,

showing how organizational narratives shape perceptions of legitimacy and influence the

willingness of foreign partners to cooperate.

Together, these theoretical lenses provide an integrated framework for analyzing how soft

power operates through concrete exchange mechanisms in policing, while acknowledging

the persistent role of enforcement and the importance of strategic communication.

1.8 Structural Overview This thesis is organized into six chapters.

Chapter One provides the conceptual foundation for the study. It introduces the research

problem, states the objectives and research questions, outlines the significance of the

study, defines its scope and limitations, and presents the theoretical framework through

which soft power in cross-border policing will be analyzed.

Chapter Two offers a critical review of the literature on soft power, international

relations, public diplomacy, and transnational policing, situating the study within current

scholarly and policy discourse.

Chapter Three describes the research design, including case selection, data sources, and

analytical methods employed to examine how soft power operates in law enforcement

partnerships.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Chapter Four presents the empirical findings, focusing on how attraction, legitimacy,

innovation, and convening capacity shape cooperation, with particular attention to Dubai

and the wider Gulf context.

Chapter Five discusses these findings in relation to the theoretical framework and

research questions, drawing out both academic and policy implications.

Chapter Six concludes the thesis by summarizing the main findings, offering specific

recommendations for practitioners and policymakers, acknowledging the study's

limitations, and suggesting directions for future research.

Having laid the conceptual groundwork for the study by presenting the research problem,

questions, and guiding theoretical framework, Chapter Two proceeds to critically review

the existing literature. The next chapter will deepen our understanding of soft power

theory and its application in the policing domain, thereby paving the way for identifying

the research gaps that this thesis aims to address.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Chapter 2 Literature review

2.1 Introduction Over the past decades, the growing complexity of transnational crime and security

challenges has compelled law enforcement agencies to cooperate across national borders

with increasing urgency. Traditional approaches to international policing have relied

heavily on institutionalized mechanisms of power formal treaties, extradition agreements,

and coercive enforcement procedures designed to track criminals and compel

cooperation. However, a complementary strategy has gained prominence alongside these

hard power tools: the deployment of soft power to cultivate trust and voluntary

collaboration between police institutions. In the policing context, this implies building

goodwill, shared norms, and professional networks that make countries willing to

cooperate without coercion. Recent scholarship suggests that non-coercive arrangements

may be as significant as legal instruments in sustaining long-term partnerships among law

enforcement agencies (Yew-woei, 2023).

This chapter provides a critical review of the literature on soft power and its application

to cross-border policing. It pursues four main objectives. First, it examines the theoretical

foundations of soft power, tracing its origins in international relations scholarship and its

extension into security studies. Second, it analyzes how soft power operates alongside

hard power and smart power strategies in contemporary policing, drawing on studies that

examine how agencies combine coercive capacity with attraction-based tools. Third, it

reviews empirical research on the specific mechanisms through which soft power is

operationalized in policing including training programs, officer exchanges, liaison

networks, transparent communication, and institutional reform with particular attention

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

to the Gulf region. Fourth, it identifies gaps in the existing literature, arguing that the role

of soft power in policing, especially in the context of emerging global hubs like the United

Arab Emirates, remains undertheorized and under-documented.

The chapter is organized as follows. Section 2.2 traces the conceptual evolution of soft

power from Nye's foundational work to its contemporary applications in security

governance. Section 2.3 examines the relationship between soft, hard, and smart power

in international policing. Section 2.4 reviews empirical studies on the mechanisms of soft

power in law enforcement cooperation. Section 2.5 focuses specifically on the Gulf

context, analyzing recent research on policing diplomacy in the UAE and its neighbors.

Section 2.6 synthesizes the literature and identifies the research gaps that this thesis seeks

to address. Section 2.7 concludes with a summary of key insights and their implications

for the study.

2.2 Conceptual Foundations of Soft Power

2.2.1 Defining Soft Power

Soft power refers to the ability to influence the preferences and behavior of others through

attraction rather than coercion (Nye, 2004). Unlike hard power, which rests on threats or

inducements, soft power leads others to want what you want. According to Nye (2004),

it is the capacity to obtain desired outcomes without force or payment. This influence

derives from the perceived legitimacy and appeal of a country's culture, political values,

and foreign policies. The more a nation's ideals and actions are admired, the more likely

others are to follow its example voluntarily. The concept has since been refined and

debated extensively, but its core logic endures.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Nye (2021) reaffirms that soft power is fundamentally voluntarist and attractive rather

than coercive. Its primary resources are intangible culture, values, and policies that project

an appealing image. When these features create an enabling environment for influence,

other states or peoples admire them and comply willingly, without compulsion. Critics,

however, question whether soft and hard power can be meaningfully distinguished,

arguing that the two intertwine in practice (Bettine & Ozdemir, 2024). Nye (2021)

acknowledges this overlap but maintains that the concept retains analytical utility for

understanding influence rooted in attraction rather than threat.

What emerges from this scholarly exchange is a fundamental tension: where Nye insists

on the analytical separability of hard and soft power as ideal types, critics like Bettine and

Ozdemir (2024) contend that in empirical reality, the two are so deeply entangled that

distinguishing them becomes conceptually problematic. This study navigates this tension

by treating soft power not as a pure form existing independently of coercion, but as a

strategic orientation a deliberate emphasis on attraction-based mechanisms even when

coercive capacities remain in the background. This approach aligns with Nye's later work

while remaining attentive to the empirical entanglement critics highlight.

For this study, a critical step is to operationalize Nye's concept of attraction as an

institutional practice rather than an abstract disposition. In the policing context, attraction

becomes anchored in observable assurances of professionalism, legality, responsiveness,

and transparency qualities that make foreign entities feel secure and willing to cooperate.

Police agencies translate soft power resources into working trust through concrete

mechanisms: training partnerships, liaison postings, predictable data protection regimes,

and established oversight procedures. This interpretation aligns with Nye's assertion that

credible values and policies form the basis of attraction, while specifying that in security

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

cooperation, these values must manifest in measurable procedures capable of mitigating

perceived risk and uncertainty (Nye, 2004; Nye, 2021).

2.2.2 Soft Power in Policing: The Gulf Context

The logic of non-coercive influence, rooted in cultural appeal and trust, has proven

equally applicable in security and policing contexts. Dubai Police provides a salient

illustration: the agency explicitly associates its international image with values of trust

and innovation rather than force or fear (Brand Finance, 2025b). According to Brand

Finance (2025a), Dubai Police's brand strength rated AAA+ rests on professionalism,

transparency, and community trust. These findings suggest that institutional credibility

and service performance function as sources of soft influence alongside, or even in place

of, traditional cultural appeal.

A recent empirical study of Abu Dhabi Police and other UAE institutions reinforces this

insight. Al Hanaee and Davies (2022) demonstrate that community engagement,

procedural fairness, and service quality are conceptualized as deliberate strategies of soft

power policing, enabling institutions to sustain trust and international reputation. Their

work clarifies and extends Nye's argument by suggesting that in the policing arena, soft

power resides less in cultural exports and more in performance-based legitimacy: partners

and publics reward agencies that demonstrate competence, respect rights, and act

predictably.

However, the literature also offers a caution: branding metrics, while useful, are not

sufficient for analysis, as they may overvalue image at the expense of practice. This study

therefore treats branding indicators and communication campaigns as signals that require

validation against substantive institutional reforms, training practices, and cooperation

outcomes.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

2.2.3 Soft Power versus Hard Power and the Rise of Smart Power

Understanding the distinction between soft power and classical hard power and their

interrelationship is essential for analyzing contemporary security cooperation. Hard

power refers to the ability to coerce, typically through military force or economic

inducements and sanctions what Nye describes as "sticks and carrots." Soft power, as

discussed, functions through appeal and persuasion rather than payment or pressure.

Crucially, these two forms of power are not mutually exclusive, nor do they operate as a

zero-sum game. States and institutions regularly deploy them in combination. Hard power

can sometimes complement soft power: a robust defense capability, for instance, can

reassure allies and enhance credibility. Conversely, the misuse of hard power can severely

undermine soft power by tarnishing a state's image and eroding goodwill. This delicate

balance has been explored in recent empirical studies. Mutz and Simmons (2022), for

example, found that constructing physical border walls a quintessential hard-power

measure weakened foreign respect for the wall-building country, fostering perceptions of

aggressiveness and reducing voluntary cooperation. Forceful security measures, they

conclude, can prove counterproductive, undermining the very collaboration they aim to

secure.

Yet hard and soft power can also reinforce one another when intelligently balanced.

Defense analysts note that long-term relationship-building with allies yields tangible

military benefits, enhancing interoperability and trust on the battlefield (Teichert, 2022).

The years of joint training among NATO air forces and exchanges of officers created

personal contacts and shared norms that proved critical to the rapid and coordinated air

response during the 2022 Ukraine crisis. This demonstrates that soft power investments

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

can translate into combat effectiveness when crises arise, with mutual trust serving as a

force multiplier.

Juxtaposing these two studies reveals a striking contrast in how hard and soft power

interact. Mutz and Simmons (2022) demonstrate how a hard-power symbol the border

wall actively destroys soft power by signaling aggressiveness and closing off cooperation.

Teichert (2022), by contrast, shows how soft power investments (joint training,

exchanges) enhance hard-power effectiveness when crisis demands. Taken together, they

suggest that the relationship between hard and soft power is not fixed but conditional:

hard power undermines soft power when it signals exclusion and unilateralism, while soft

power amplifies hard power when it builds the trust and interoperability needed for

coordinated action. This conditional relationship is central to understanding smart power

in policing.

This strategic combination of hard and soft power resources is captured in the concept of

smart power. Ernest J. Wilson III (2008) defines smart power as the integration of hard

and soft power instruments in complementary ways to achieve positive outcomes.

Coercion alone is expensive and breeds resistance, while attraction alone may not suffice

to address immediate threats. Smart power therefore involves calibrating the balance of

tools to fit the circumstances. Wilson describes hard and soft power as a continuum:

policymakers must find the right balance, employing hard power when necessary but

embedding forceful actions within a soft power framework ensuring that coercive steps

are perceived as legitimate, or even rendered unnecessary through active confidence-

building. This approach aligns with calls from defense and diplomatic leaders for greater

investment in soft power to achieve sustainable security outcomes (Wilson, 2008).

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

This integrated approach is evident in policing cooperation. Agencies draw on formal

legal authority, extradition treaties, and robust enforcement to address major threats,

while simultaneously cultivating informal trust networks, exchange programs, and joint

investigative forums that stimulate voluntary collaboration. Hard power tools provide

legal capability and deterrence, but they cannot, on their own, overcome reluctance,

sovereignty concerns, or reputational costs that impede information sharing. These

barriers are best addressed through complementary soft power investments.

Recent evaluations of security cooperation in the Gulf and European contexts underscore

this point. Bullock et al. (2025) found that agencies perceived as excessively reliant on

unilateral or indiscriminate enforcement erode their cooperative capital. By contrast,

those that pair enforcement capacity with transparent and predictable safeguards retain

influence and are preferred as partners.

In the context of cross-border policing, a smart power approach implies that coercive

instruments arrests, controlled deliveries, intrusive surveillance are exercised within clear

legal and rights-based frameworks. Simultaneously, parallel investments in exchanges,

liaison networks, technical support, and transparent communication build attractiveness

and willingness to collaborate. When partners perceive an agency as both competent and

procedurally just, they are more likely to prioritize its requests, engage in joint operations,

and support its leadership initiatives. Conversely, enforcement perceived as politically

motivated or arbitrarily coercive erodes the very trust on which transnational cooperation

depends.

2.2.4 Soft Power in International Relations Practice

Since its introduction, soft power has been widely used to explain how states advance

their interests without resorting to military force. A substantial body of literature

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

documents how nations deploy culture, values, and institutions to attract followers, shape

global norms, and foster collaboration. This section reviews the principal instruments

through which soft power operates in international relations, with particular attention to

those relevant to transnational policing.

Cultural diplomacy and international communication represent two core soft power

instruments. Cultural institutes, exchange programs, and international broadcasting

services project a nation's culture and worldview, enhancing its attractiveness to foreign

publics (Nye, 2004). These public diplomacy tools became increasingly indispensable in

the 21st century, as global public opinion and credibility increasingly shape a country's

ability to build coalitions and exert influence. When foreign populations view a country

positively, their governments find it easier to align with its initiatives.

Educational exchange constitutes another significant soft power mechanism. Inviting

international students and professionals yields long-term diplomatic dividends. Many

returnees maintain positive impressions and personal connections, creating reservoirs of

goodwill that facilitate future cooperation. Nye (2021) notes that socializing future

foreign leaders through exposure to a host country's culture and institutions is a subtle but

effective form of influence. Atkinson (2010) found that student exchanges between the

1980s and 2006 correlated with more favorable attitudes toward host country policies.

These educational exchanges function as intangible soft power assets: they inculcate

values gradually and forge enduring interpersonal relationships. Global leaders who have

studied abroad often retain lifelong empathy for their host countries. This represents soft

power by people influence cultivated through shaping perceptions and building networks

rather than through force.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Foreign aid and technical assistance also generate soft power. Disaster relief, health

services, and development programs can improve a donor country's image and cultivate

friendships. When aid is perceived as humanitarian rather than transactional, it tends to

enhance soft power. The goodwill generated by timely disaster response or pandemic

support can translate into future diplomatic backing. Capacity-building programs such as

training foreign bureaucrats, judges, or police officers serve a dual function: they transfer

expertise while modeling the donor country's practices and creating personal connections.

China's rise as a global power illustrates this dynamic. Beijing has invested heavily in

exporting its culture and training foreign officials (Lai & Lu, 2012). Its extensive

exchange programs for foreign police and military officers aim to cultivate loyalty or at

least favorable relations within security sectors abroad. These initiatives produce cohorts

of foreign security personnel familiar with and potentially responsive to Chinese

practices. They form part of a broader soft power strategy to shape global norms and

present China as a responsible stakeholder, complementing its economic and military

ascent. Similarly, the United States has long welcomed foreign officers to its FBI National

Academy and other programs, building pro-US networks worldwide.

The instruments reviewed above cultural diplomacy, educational exchange, and capacity-

buildingall operate through attraction and persuasion rather than coercion. In the context

of policing cooperation, this study examines how these tools are adapted and deployed

through trust-building, mutual understanding, informal partnerships, and formal legal

agreements. The mechanisms of officer exchanges, joint training, and liaison networks

discussed in subsequent sections represent the translation of these broader soft power

practices into the specific domain of transnational law enforcement.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

2.3 Soft Power and Cross-Border Policing Cooperation

2.3.1 Traditional vs. Informal Mechanisms in International Policing

Conventional approaches to international police cooperation are based on official, state-

oriented agreements typically supported by hard power. These include extradition

treaties, mutual legal assistance treaties (MLATs), and membership in intergovernmental

policing organizations such as INTERPOL and Europol all operating within specific legal

frameworks. Such instruments remain essential for anchoring cross-border law

enforcement activities in the rule of law. Nevertheless, formal agreements have well-

documented limitations. Sovereignty concerns and jurisdictional constraints can slow or

obstruct investigations; bureaucratic procedures add delays; and cooperation may stall

entirely when political relations between governments deteriorate. Formal mechanisms

often prove too slow or inflexible to respond promptly to rapidly evolving transnational

crimes. Partly in response to these limitations, police practitioners have increasingly

supplemented formal avenues with informal cooperation.

Legrand and Leuprecht (2021) observe that transgovernmental cooperation networks

operating parallel to formal organizations have evolved rapidly to address transnational

illicit markets. These networks are horizontal across borders and comprise sub-state

actors including police, customs, and intelligence units. Crucially, they operate through

interpersonal relations and professional trust rather than treaties. Officers establish

personal contacts with foreign colleagues, developing confidence that these counterparts

will assist them in investigations. Over time, this generates networks of personal

acquaintances and unofficial agreements what Legrand and Leuprecht term a

"transnational web of cooperation" that operates outside formal state hierarchies. Such

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

connections tend to endure even when political winds shift, as they are rooted in shared

professional ethos and mutual dependence.

Even INTERPOL, the world's largest formal policing organization with 195 member

countries, depends fundamentally on voluntary cooperation and trust despite its legal

structure. As its constitution outlines, a central premise of global police cooperation is

that member agencies trust one another (INTERPOL, n.d.). The decision to act on

INTERPOL communications rests entirely with each member country. Hence, the system

operates only to the extent that police departments trust the channels and trust one another

to use them in good faith. INTERPOL's color-coded notice system and its I-24/7 secure

communication network represent voluntary information-sharing mechanisms.

Responding to an INTERPOL notice is not mandatory; it depends on a national police

agency's willingness to assist. This dynamic underscores the critical importance of

relationships and reputation. Agencies that misuse the system for instance, by posting

politically motivated notices lose credibility, and their requests receive less attention.

Conversely, agencies that cultivate reputations for professionalism and reciprocity

accumulate soft power within the global policing community; they are known as reliable

partners. In this way, unwritten rules of trust and reciprocity sustain cooperation even

within formal organizations like INTERPOL.

Beyond multilateral bodies, numerous bilateral and regional informal mechanisms also

operate. Police departments frequently deploy liaison officers to other countries, placing

personnel on the ground to build relationships. These affiliations are built not on treaties

but on practical necessity and interpersonal rapport. The United States, for example,

stations FBI Legal Attachés and DEA agents in dozens of countries. These officers work

daily with host country law enforcement, exchanging intelligence and supporting

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

investigations. Such sustained interaction fosters dense personal networks. When urgent

information or assistance is needed across borders, a phone call between trusted

colleagues often proves far more effective than a formal request channeled through

diplomatic ministries. This type of liaison network constitutes a form of police diplomacy,

in which officers serve as informal diplomatic representatives. Fernandes (2024)

examines this phenomenon in the context of Portuguese police liaison officers embedded

in diplomatic missions abroad, showing how they conduct representation, information

sharing, and negotiation to expand national security collaboration. These officers embody

soft power by building personal bridges between law enforcement communities.

While informal networks significantly enhance agility and trust, they are not without

risks. By circumventing some governmental oversight mechanisms, powerful nations

may exploit these trust-based relationships to advance their own interests. Villela's (2021)

case study of drug enforcement collaboration between the United States and Brazil

illustrates this dynamic. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration leveraged personal

connections and goodwill to pursue operations in ways that critics argue bypassed official

Brazilian regulations. In this instance, the close relationship between the DEA and the

Brazilian Federal Police forged through years of training and camaraderie enabled actions

that some viewed as serving U.S. interests at the expense of Brazilian sovereignty. This

case highlights how power asymmetries can manifest through informal networks, raising

questions about reciprocity and accountability.

Comparing Legrand and Leuprecht (2021) with Villela (2021) reveals two competing

narratives about informal policing networks. Legrand and Leuprecht present

transgovernmental networks as largely benign efficient, trust-based, and resilient

mechanisms that operate outside rigid state hierarchies to address transnational crime.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Villela, by contrast, exposes the darker side of these same networks: they can become

instruments through which powerful states project influence, bypass local oversight, and

entrench asymmetrical relationships. Where Legrand and Leuprecht see agility and

effectiveness, Villela sees potential for domination. This contrast is not merely academic;

it cuts to the heart of whether soft power in policing represents genuine cooperation or a

subtler form of control. This study navigates this tension by treating informal networks

as analytically double-edged capable of both enabling authentic partnership and

facilitating unequal influence, depending on the presence of reciprocity, transparency,

and rights-respecting governance.

Such critiques underscore that trust-based networks require mutual respect, transparency,

and genuine reciprocity to remain healthy and legitimate. Nevertheless, most practitioners

recognize that informal trust-based collaboration is essential in contemporary policing.

When formal cooperation falters due to politics or bureaucracy, these transnational

professional networks keep information and assistance flowing. These findings suggest

that informal networks are not merely pragmatic shortcuts but organized manifestations

of soft power, rooted in developed credibility, reciprocity, and perceived fairness.

However, as Villela's (2021) study demonstrates, power asymmetries can enable stronger

states to capitalize on trust-based networks for their own advantage. This thesis therefore

adopts a critical perspective, viewing soft power in policing not only as an opportunity

for cooperation but also as a potential site of asymmetrical influence a lens through which

to examine the Gulf and Dubai context. International policing relies on traditional formal

mechanisms to provide legal structure, but day-to-day cross-border cooperation often

proves most effective and resilient when animated by informal soft-power mechanisms:

personal trust, reputational capital, and professional friendships.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

2.3.2 Soft Power and Policing: Dubai’s Initiatives and Regional Context

Dubai's policing programs provide a compelling example of how hard-security

capabilities can be combined with soft-power approaches. Dubai Police has actively

developed a powerful international brand and an amicable image as part of the city's

broader soft power vision. In recent years, Dubai Police has consistently led international

police reputation indices. According to Brand Finance (2025a), Dubai Police is ranked as

the world's strongest police brand a position attributed to investments in high-profile

technological solutions and people-oriented events that project an image of a modern,

service-focused organization. These initiatives humanize the force and signal its

commitment to innovation and community service, thereby enhancing its soft power. For

instance, Dubai Police has deployed luxury patrol vehicles and sophisticated AI

capabilities not only for operational purposes but also as symbolic outreach to the

community, demonstrating a futuristic, high-tech, and community-oriented ethos.

Event diplomacy reinforces this branding strategy. Dubai hosts the annual World Police

Summit under the patronage of its leadership, bringing together delegations from

approximately 100 international agencies (Emirates News Agency, 2023). Lieutenant

General Al Marri, Commander of Dubai Police, has stated that the Summit aims to make

international policing more organized and professional by fostering collaboration and

exposing agencies to new technologies and trends (Emirates News Agency, 2023). Such

events enhance cross-border ties and advance the UAE's soft power interests by projecting

openness and innovation.

Recent peer-reviewed scholarship on the region indicates that Gulf states including the

UAE, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia compete and cooperate through sophisticated soft power

strategies that integrate global events, branding, mediation, and security alliances

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

(Chaziza & Lutmar, 2025). While much of this literature focuses on diplomacy and sport,

it increasingly recognizes policing organizations as front-line implementers of national

soft power strategies, particularly where police visibility, safety ratings, and

innovativeness constitute core elements of international reputation. The examples of

Dubai and Abu Dhabi discussed by Al Hanaee and Davies (2022), together with the

broader literature on soft power policing in the Emirates, suggest that police agencies not

only enforce security but also construct state discourses of responsibility, modernity, and

rule compliance in ways that attract cooperation and investment. These events provide

platforms for networking, norm-sharing, and goodwill-building that extend beyond

formal conferences. This represents a direct soft power approach: rather than compelling

partners, Dubai appeals to them through hospitality, knowledge exchange, and the

promise of participation in a world-leading network.

Dubai Police also cultivates foreign alliances to enhance its soft power. A recent example

involves a human rights training program conducted in collaboration with the United

Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) in 2025. By holding workshops

with UN experts on human rights-oriented policing, Dubai Police signaled its

commitment to international standards and norms (UNITAR, 2025). Such partnerships

improve local practice while simultaneously conveying a soft power message: that Dubai

adheres to principles of global justice and human rights. This enhances external

credibility, as international observers see Dubai Police engaging positively with the UN,

creating an impression of the agency as a responsible and norm-abiding actor. These

initiatives align with the UAE's national soft power strategy, which seeks to project an

image of openness, innovation, and humanitarianism. Dubai Police serves as a

spokesperson for these values, using its security achievements and innovative practices

to win hearts and minds abroad.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) members are pursuing similar strategies. Abu

Dhabi Police, for example, has adopted soft policing approaches emphasizing community

engagement and trust-building. Al Hanaee and Davies (2022) found that Abu Dhabi

police leaders strategically frame their community relations work around the concept of

soft power, positioning themselves to deploy both persuasive and coercive means as

circumstances require. This represents a notable shift: historically, security in the Gulf

was viewed strictly through the lens of hard power. However, there is growing recognition

that lasting influence can be achieved by cultivating goodwill and securing voluntary

cooperation.

That said, local contexts vary considerably. Dubai's massive investments in high-tech

services and branding may prove difficult to replicate in smaller or less wealthy

jurisdictions, particularly where social trust must be built from the ground up. Effective

soft power policing requires sustained investment and a favorable political environment

including stable governance and citizen buy-in. Cultivating such reserves of goodwill is

challenging in countries with fewer resources or greater internal instability. Nevertheless,

Dubai's case demonstrates that even agencies primarily associated with hard security can

become effective soft power actors. By demonstrating competence and proactively

developing international relationships, a police force can enhance bilateral ties and make

its home country more attractive to foreign partners.

However, comparative studies of Gulf soft power caution that these tactics attract both

admirers and critics. Scholars note that reputational campaigns may help rebrand Gulf

states as trusted partners, but they can also invite accusations of image management if

underlying issues such as human rights concerns, authoritarian governance, or

politicization of security remain unaddressed (Guzansky & Zalayat, 2024). In the policing

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

context, this tension highlights a central theme of the present research: soft power in

policing can only prove durable when symbolic innovations flagship events or elite

equipment are accompanied by substantive commitments to legality, accountability, and

transparent engagement. The UAE case thus offers a critical test of whether performance-

based soft power can sustain credible cross-border policing collaboration over the long

term.

2.3.3 Soft Power Strategies in International Policing

Current research and policy reviews indicate that various soft power-based policies can

improve police collaboration across borders. These strategies seek to develop capacity,

trust, and mutual understanding among law enforcement agencies without legal

compulsion.

2.3.3.1 Training and Exchange Programs

The training of foreign police officers has long been used as an instrument of both support

and influence. International law enforcement academies operate in many countries, and

expert trainers are deployed abroad to build capacity. For example, the United States runs

International Law Enforcement Academies (ILEAs) in various regions alongside

specialized DEA and FBI schools for foreign officers. While the stated objective is to

build capacity in partner countries, an equally crucial aim is to cultivate long-term

relationships and goodwill (Villela, 2021). These programs often result in the transfer of

policing models and norms to the host country. For instance, Brazil's drug enforcement

tactics have increasingly come to resemble those of the U.S. through decades of training

and institutional influence (Villela, 2021).

In addition to technical training, these programs strategically develop an alumni base of

officers who are familiar with and trust one another. These connections create

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

transnational trust networks: graduates of the same course maintain informal contacts and

are more likely to assist one another across borders. Such relationships can occasionally

withstand political tensions between their countries, allowing police collaboration to

continue unaffected by diplomatic divisions. In short, joint training experiences create a

community of law enforcement professionals who share a common language and mutual

professional trust a clear soft power outcome.

While Western countries have long employed training as a soft power tool, rising powers

are increasingly doing so on an even larger scale. China's training of foreign police has

expanded significantly as part of its security collaboration and diplomatic outreach

(Greitens et al., 2025). Under President Xi's Global Security Initiative (GSI), China has

pledged to develop a global training system that would provide law enforcement training

to more officers from developing countries (Greitens et al., 2025). China has constructed

large-scale facilities such as the China-Pacific Islands Police Training Center a 30,000

square meter installation at the Fujian Police Academy dedicated specifically to training

Pacific Island police (Greitens et al., 2025). Through these programs, foreign agencies

are offered free training, equipment demonstrations, and joint exercises designed to

spread Chinese policing philosophies. The outcome resembles that of Western programs:

a web of foreign officials familiar with and favorably disposed toward Chinese practices.

Greitens et al. (2025) report that China's Ministry of Public Security has conducted more

than two hundred distinct exchanges with foreign entities in recent years, indicating that

non-military security cooperation is a core component of Chinese foreign policy. By

training and socializing foreign police, China is both assisting those countries and

projecting its influence a classic form of soft power in policing.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Training and exchange programs by any country can be understood as "trust engines":

they help establish personal goodwill and a sense of common mission among officers

from different nations. Such relationships can serve as the foundation for subsequent

multilateral operations or intelligence exchanges, operating independently of or insulated

from the ups and downs of high politics. This literature, however, seldom quantifies

whether such training-based networks generate quicker responses, improved evidence

processing, or more robust cooperation, and often presumes that the socialization process

is normatively neutral. Recent research on Abu Dhabi and other Gulf policing institutions

indicates that soft power training frameworks can promote community trust while also

exporting specific governance preferences raising the question of whose norms are being

diffused through such programs (Al Hanaee & Davies, 2022). By treating exchanges as

potential mechanisms of both attraction and influence, this study empirically tests how

alumni ecosystems and embedded officers function as operationalized soft power in

transnational policing partnerships.

2.3.3.2 International Policing Summits and Networks

A second soft power approach involves hosting regular international conferences, forums,

and networks for law enforcement representatives. These meetings provide avenues for

relationship-building, idea exchange, and norm diffusion. A prime example is the annual

INTERPOL General Assembly, attended by law enforcement officials from nearly all

countries, where they deliberate on shared challenges and best practices. While it includes

formal elements resolutions, elections of officials much of its value lies in informal

interactions: hallway conversations, personal introductions, and exposure to new ideas.

Similarly, many regions hold regular conferences that strengthen linkages among regional

police forces.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Thematic forums hosted by individual countries or agencies also serve both practical and

soft power purposes. As noted earlier, the World Police Summit in Dubai aims to position

the UAE as a global hub for policing innovation. Another example is the Global Public

Security Cooperation Forum (GPSCF) based in Lianyungang, China. The first such event

organized by China was a Belt and Road Initiative-associated forum held in Beijing in

2015, which brought together dozens of police and security officials from multiple

countries; subsequent forums have been hosted in Lianyungang. The forum offers training

workshops, joint exercises, and demonstrations of Chinese security equipment and

technologies. It represents China's effort to position itself as a leader in the transnational

policing community. The forum enables China to shape preferences familiarizing foreign

officers with Chinese practices and products while cultivating an image of global

leadership in police cooperation through free training and networking opportunities.

According to Greitens et al. (2025), under the GSI framework, China has been actively

constructing an alternative security cooperation architecture centered on law

enforcement, with the Lianyungang forum as a prominent example. This concerted

diplomatic effort in the policing domain enables China to diffuse its preferred norms and

standards of security governance, offering an alternative to Western-led systems.

It is possible to view such forums as epistemic networking exercises, with communities

of policing professionals sharing information and reinforcing shared professional values.

Such networks can build collective understanding for example, consensus on best

practices in cybercrime investigation that subsequently informs national policies. Nations

such as China (or the UAE or USA) obtain soft power by hosting and influencing these

international networks: they become agenda-setters in the discourse of global policing.

Simultaneously, individual officers and agencies acquire personal contacts. Summits

facilitate what might be termed "corridor diplomacy": for instance, a police chief from

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Country A and their counterpart from Country B may informally agree to cooperate on a

specific case or exchange officers. These are intangible results that contribute

significantly to daily collaboration. In summary, international policing summits and

networks function as incubators of soft power, aligning law enforcement communities

and fostering cross-border camaraderie without coercion.

However, the literature pays limited attention to the quality and sustainability of

commitments formed at such forums, and often fails to specify how corridor contacts

translate into tangible cooperation outcomes such as early information sharing, joint

investigations, or standardized data protection. The literature on the future of policing and

global law enforcement innovation emphasizes that convening power alone is

insufficient; it must be accompanied by follow-up mechanisms, interoperable platforms,

and rights-respecting governance to sustain the trust generated at summits (INTERPOL,

2023). This gap directly informs the present study's focus on tracing how summit

diplomacy translates into daily cooperation.

2.3.3.3 Informal Agreements and Information-Sharing

A growing trend involves the use of memoranda of understanding (MoUs) and other non-

binding agreements among police agencies to facilitate cooperation. These are typically

non-binding instrument statements of intent or procedural guidelines that authorities

voluntarily adopt. For example, neighboring countries may have informal arrangements

to notify each other immediately when a criminal suspect flees across the border, even

before a formal extradition request is filed. Such "handshake arrangements" can address

gaps in formal procedures. Informal or quasi-legal solutions have proliferated in

migration and border security. Frasca (2023), examining EU-Africa migration

cooperation, found that the EU frequently relies on informal agreements rather than

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

formal treaties to achieve its migration control objectives. These informal tools are

adaptable and can be adopted more quickly than formal agreements. The EU can export

its policy preferences using incentives and persuasion instead of enacting binding legal

obligations. In the policing context, a nation may agree to place a liaison officer in a

partner country's police headquarters or jointly patrol with them temporarily, without

forming an actual treaty.

Such informal agreements involve soft power insofar as persuasion and incentives lead

partners to consent voluntarily. A state may offer training, funding, or political goodwill

to encourage cooperation. Cooperation is not coerced; it rests on mutual trust and the

expectation of shared benefits. This dynamic is currently visible in the Pacific. In 2022,

Fiji halted a police cooperation agreement with China due to domestic reasons. In 2023,

however, New Zealand and Australia reached a new security framework focused on

community policing and training. The distinction lay in trust and perceived alignment of

intentions: partners are more willing to enter informal agreements when they believe in

each other's values and commitments. This illustrates how informal cooperation depends

on soft power dynamics specifically, the degree to which one partner trusts the other's

intentions. In fact, informal cooperation depends on the currency of trust. When an agency

develops a reputation for respecting partners' sovereignty and fulfilling its promises, other

parties will more readily enter into non-binding agreements. Informal cooperation will

evaporate if a state is perceived as using collaboration as an excuse to interfere politically.

This centrality of trust is increasingly recognized in global reports. The INTERPOL

Future of Policing report (2024) notes that geopolitical disputes undermine confidence

between countries and may lead to the redefinition of international police cooperation

models. The informal glue of cross-border policing would be destabilized by a lack of

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

trust, leading either to withdrawal into unilateralism or the development of new

mechanisms. These discussions suggest that informal tools function as soft power

instruments only to the extent that they rest on credible commitments, perceived equality,

and adherence to the rule of law. When informal understandings are used to circumvent

safeguards or entrench unequal influence, they undermine rather than enhance the appeal

on which voluntary cooperation depends. This study addresses this dilemma by

examining how practitioners perceive the legitimacy of informal channels, and how

institutions like INTERPOL and Europol seek to institutionalize trust through

standardized, rights-based data processing frameworks. The report pointed out that

ongoing regional conflicts and rivalries complicate cross-border law enforcement. To

overcome these stressors, law enforcement executives promote more active trust-building

interventions such as leadership dialogues and joint community initiatives to strengthen

the willingness to share information.

2.4 Theoretical Framework This study draws on theoretical frameworks of soft power and international cooperation.

The central framework is Joseph Nye's theory of soft power, which emphasizes attraction

and persuasion rather than coercion in achieving desired objectives (Nye, 2004). Nye's

analytical framework directs attention to how non-coercive measures shape the behavior

of international actors. Applying soft power theory, cross-border policing is understood

as a process shaped by perceptions, values, and relationships. The underlying premise is

that police institutions or national law enforcement models that are admired and trusted

will be more effective in attracting partners and securing their cooperation. Soft power

theory thus helps generate hypotheses about which factors may be central to successful

policing cooperation. These propositions are highly relevant in the context of the United

Arab Emirates and the Gulf, as the policing agencies in these countries act as providers

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

of domestic security, a center of regional cooperation, and a face of national soft power

policy.

Moreover, the study draws on theories of transnational policing and trust-based networks,

alongside broader international relations frameworks that explain voluntary cooperation.

One relevant approach is the concept of transgovernmental networks (Legrand &

Leuprecht, 2021), which posits that sub-state actors create horizontal, cross-border

linkages that operate alongside traditional state diplomacy. These networks are sustained

by mutual trust and shared professional standards, which bind actors together.

Transgovernmental network theory helps explain how police-to-police relationships can

endure through shifting political circumstances, sustained by an autonomous professional

community. This complements soft power theory by specifying the mechanisms through

which attraction and persuasion operate in practice.

Also, classical IR theories of cooperation, particularly those of the liberal institutionalist

school, guide our framework. Liberal institutionalism contends that even under anarchy,

states can be incentivized to cooperate through repeated interaction, institutional

frameworks, and expectations of future gains (Ramli & Idris, 2022). Trust and reputation

are significant. In policing terms, a country that routinely refuses to assist others or

misuses shared data may find itself isolated. Conversely, those who contribute and

reciprocate in cooperative endeavors build a reputation, encouraging others to cooperate.

This logic reinforces why soft power rooted in reputation and reciprocity constitutes a

critical asset in transnational policing. Ramli and Idris (2022) invoke the concept of

security communities, wherein groups of states develop sufficient mutual trust and shared

identity that they come to expect peaceful resolution of disputes.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Figure 2-1: Conceptual Map.

Figure 2-2: Conceptual model linking capability, legitimacy, and

convening power to trust and cooperation outcomes.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

2.5 Gaps in the Literature The literature review identifies four interconnected gaps that this study addresses.

First, existing studies privilege formal legal instruments and macro-diplomatic accounts,

paying insufficient attention to the operational dimensions of soft power in law

enforcement partnerships. The vast majority of soft power scholarship concerns states,

foreign ministries, and cultural diplomacy, while empirical research on policing

cooperation focuses on treaties, extradition, and mutual legal assistance. Specifically, the

processes through which attraction, legitimacy, and procedural fairness within law

enforcement institutions shape early information sharing, request prioritization, or

cooperation resilience remain underspecified creating a gap between high-level soft

power theory and the practical realities of cross-border policing.

Second, few systematic evaluations exist of specific soft power instruments in policing

such as officer exchanges, long-term training ecosystems, liaison postings, international

policing summits, and informal agreements. Much of the literature suggests that these

activities build trust and alignment, yet provides minimal comparative or longitudinal

data linking them to measurable cooperation outcomes such as response times,

intelligence quality, or the durability of joint operations. Recent work on soft power

policing in Abu Dhabi and transnational capacity-building has begun conceptualizing

these dynamics, yet such efforts remain fragmented and rarely integrated into a broader

explanatory framework (Al Hanaee & Davies, 2022; The Transnational Circulation of

Community Policing, 2025).

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Third, global branding, mediation, and event diplomacy have been discussed as key

elements of soft power in the Gulf including the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and

Qatar but the role of policing institutions in these strategies remains poorly theorized.

Comparative Gulf scholarship identifies how these states employ niche diplomacy and

global convening, yet rarely examines how police agencies function as soft power agents

through their cooperative practices, innovation, and rights-related commitments (Chaziza

& Lutmar, 2025; Bianco & Sons, 2023). Consequently, the policing context of the UAE

and Dubai in particular remains underexplored as an empirical site for examining the

interplay between national soft power strategies and transnational security cooperation.

Fourth, there exist insufficient normative and ethical inquiries into soft power in policing.

Much of the literature celebrates the agility of informal networks and flexible

arrangements, yet critical scholarship reveals that these same mechanisms can replicate

power asymmetries or evade accountability (Villela, 2021). Rights-anchored governance

and data protection are often framed as obstacles rather than potential sources of

legitimacy that enable safe early sharing and strengthen trust. Existing literature only

partially addresses how transparent procedures, oversight, and inclusive practices can

transform soft power from a rhetorical asset into a measurable foundation for equitable

cooperation.

This thesis addresses these gaps by operationalizing soft power within the tangible

activities of cross-border policing, focusing specifically on Dubai and the broader UAE

as an emerging hub. It constructs a theoretical framework linking soft power, public

diplomacy, smart power, and transgovernmental networks to observable cooperation

mechanisms. The study triangulates qualitative data to trace how exchanges, summits,

liaison networks, informal agreements, and rights-based governance shape trust,

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

legitimacy, and collaborative capacity. In doing so, it contributes both to international

relations scholarship and to practitioner debates on how to make soft power strategies

empirically grounded, ethically defensible, and practically viable in international policing

cooperation.

This chapter concludes that the existing literature, despite its richness, leaves clear gaps

regarding the practical application of soft power in cross-border policing partnerships,

particularly in the Gulf context. Building upon these identified gaps, Chapter Three will

present the methodology adopted in this study, detailing the research design, data

collection strategies, and analytical methods that will be used to answer the research

questions and explore these underexplored dynamics.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Chapter 3 Methodology

3.1 Research Design and Case Selection This study adopts a qualitative multiple-case study design to examine how soft power

strategies influence cross-border policing cooperation. The research draws on data from

15 expert interviews and a comprehensive analysis of institutional documents. A

qualitative case study approach enables the researcher to investigate complex institutional

interactions within their real-world context.

The study relies on methodological triangulation, combining semi-structured elite

interviews, systematic document analysis, and observation of publicly available

institutional communication and international policing forums. This approach allows the

research to capture how soft power strategies operate in practice within international

policing networks.

Qualitative research is particularly suitable for this study because it allows an in-depth

exploration of contextual questions such as how and why cooperation occurs. Concepts

such as soft power, trust, legitimacy, and informal cooperation mechanisms are relational

and process-oriented. These dynamics require interpretive and context-sensitive analysis

rather than purely quantitative measurement.

According to Baxter and Jack (2008), qualitative case studies allow researchers to

examine a phenomenon within its real-life context by using multiple sources of evidence.

This method is valuable for analyzing complex institutional relationships and policy

processes. Similarly, Robert K. Yin emphasizes that case study research is both a process

and a product of inquiry that is iterative, contextual, and holistic.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

A multiple-case design enables cross-case comparison across institutional contexts. The

cases examined include major international policing organizations such as INTERPOL

and Europol, as well as relevant regional policing bodies. Comparing these institutional

contexts allows the researcher to identify similarities and differences in how soft power

strategies facilitate cooperation.

Multiple-case studies also support analytical generalization by enabling systematic

comparison across cases (Baxter & Jack, 2008; Yin, 2017). Overall, a qualitative

interview-based multi-case design supported by documentary evidence is particularly

appropriate for tracing mechanisms of transnational policing cooperation. This is because

attraction, legitimacy, and trust are relational and procedural constructs that cannot be

fully captured through quantitative methods alone.

Table 3-1: Data Triangulation Overview.

Source stream Examples Purpose in triangulation

Contribution to findings

Semi-structured

interviews (N =

15)

Liaison officers;

training

coordinators; Dubai

Police; EU

agencies; policy

analysts

Mechanism

discovery;

practice

narratives;

counter-examples

Identified trust engines

(exchanges, alum

networks), accelerators

(summits, informal

pathways), legitimacy

levers (governance/rights)

Institutional

documents

INTERPOL

RPD/GA-91

amendments;

INTERPOL Annual

Report; Europol

Programming

Document;

Competency

Framework

Formal constraints

and enablers;

standards;

capabilities

Corroborated early lawful

sharing and platform

roles; linked cooperation

to procedural reliability

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Academic and

regional sources

Soft power/public

diplomacy;

Gulf/MENA

policing studies

Theory and

regional framing:

challenge/confirm

interview claims

Framed

attraction/legitimacy;

situated GCC

transferability and risks

3.2 Data Collection and Sources The study relies on both primary and secondary data sources. Primary data are collected

through semi-structured interviews and the analysis of official policy documents.

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with officials from law enforcement

institutions who have direct experience with international policing cooperation.

Participants were drawn from agencies and organizations involved in cross-border

policing collaboration, including international policing organizations, regional security

bodies, and national police forces with liaison, training, or strategic coordination roles.

The semi-structured format provided flexibility to explore participants' perspectives on

soft power practices while ensuring that key research topics were consistently addressed.

All interviews were recorded with participant consent and subsequently transcribed for

analysis.

In addition to interviews, primary textual data include institutional documents such as

policy reports, training program documentation, strategic frameworks, and official

conference communiqués published by organizations including INTERPOL and Europol.

These materials provide an official institutional perspective on cooperation practices and

soft power initiatives and were collected from official organizational websites and

publicly available archives.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Secondary sources consist of academic literature and open-source materials. These

include scholarly books and journal articles on international policing cooperation, legal

frameworks governing law enforcement collaboration, and studies of security diplomacy.

Secondary literature provides theoretical context and supports triangulation of primary

findings. In particular, the analysis is informed by the soft power framework developed

by Joseph S. Nye and by prior research on law enforcement diplomacy.

Where relevant, the interpretation of institutional narratives was also supported through

observation of publicly available speeches, panel discussions, and online events involving

policing organizations. These observations were conducted as non-participant

observations and were documented systematically in field notes to complement interview

and documentary evidence.

Data collection occurred in sequential waves. Interviews were scheduled following an

initial literature review, while documentary sources were collected concurrently. All data

sources were systematically recorded with metadata including source, date, and

institutional context. A preliminary coding framework was developed during data

collection in order to guide subsequent interviews and document selection. This iterative

process ensured that the data collection remained closely aligned with the research

questions.

3.3 Sampling Strategy Participants were selected using purposive sampling, a widely used approach in

qualitative research that focuses on identifying individuals with direct knowledge of the

phenomenon under investigation. According to Ahmad and Wilkins (2025), purposive

sampling involves selecting participants who possess relevant experience and expertise

that can contribute meaningful insights to the research topic.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

The selection criteria for interview participants included:

• Direct involvement in international policing cooperation or liaison work

• Participation in international training programs, officer exchanges, or policing

summits

• Experience in institutional communication, strategy development, or policy planning

• Relevant professional experience within law enforcement institutions

Potential participants were identified through professional networks, institutional

contacts, and direct outreach to relevant organizations. Additional participants were also

recruited through referrals from initial interviewees.

The study aimed to conduct approximately 10–20 expert interviews, with recruitment

continuing until thematic saturation was achieved. Saturation refers to the point at which

additional interviews no longer generate new analytical insights or themes (Howlader &

Sarkar, 2025). In qualitative research, expert interviews often reach saturation with

relatively small samples due to the depth of information obtained from participants.

The final participant composition balanced representation across international and

regional policing institutions. The interview sample included representatives from

INTERPOL (n = 4), European law enforcement institutions including Europol, Eurojust,

and Frontex (n = 5), as well as representatives from Gulf policing institutions including

the Gulf Cooperation Council and Dubai Police and regional training academies (n = 4).

Two additional participants included a law enforcement social media outreach specialist

and a European policy analyst.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

This distribution helped reduce regional bias and strengthened the comparative

perspective of the study.

The target sample size of 10–20 interviews was selected due to the specialized nature of

the expert population and the depth required for mechanism tracing in qualitative analysis.

During the coding process, no new first-order codes emerged after the twelfth interview,

and by the fifteenth interview, all key coding categories had been consistently populated

with similar examples. At this point, theoretical saturation was considered to have been

reached. The final sample of fifteen interviews therefore provided both diversity of

perspectives and sufficient depth for analytical interpretation.

3.4 Data Analysis Plan Data analysis followed a systematic thematic analysis approach. Interview transcripts and

documentary sources were analyzed in order to identify patterns and themes related to the

role of soft power in international policing cooperation.

The analysis proceeded through several stages.

First, the researcher conducted familiarization with the data by repeatedly reading

interview transcripts and documents while recording initial reflections in analytic memos.

Second, primary coding was conducted to identify relevant concepts and patterns. Coding

combined deductive codes derived from theoretical concepts with inductive codes

emerging directly from the data.

Third, coded data were organized into broader thematic categories that addressed the

central research questions. Qualitative data analysis software such as NVivo was used to

assist in organizing codes and identifying relationships between themes, although manual

verification of codes was also conducted.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Fourth, triangulation was applied by systematically comparing themes emerging from

interview data with evidence from institutional documents. For example, when multiple

interviewees identified training exchanges as mechanisms for building trust, these claims

were cross-checked against official summit reports and institutional program

documentation.

Fifth, analysis continued until thematic saturation was confirmed and all key themes were

supported by evidence from multiple sources.

Finally, the interpretation stage examined relationships between themes in light of soft

power theory. Patterns were compared across institutional cases using constant

comparative analysis, while attention was also given to identifying disconfirming

evidence. Key themes such as trust, legitimacy, cooperation, and innovation were

therefore traced across multiple data sources rather than relying on individual narratives.

To strengthen reliability, intercoder verification was conducted on a subset of interviews

representing early, middle, and later phases of the data collection process. Two

independent analysts coded this subset and subsequently compared their coding decisions

to evaluate agreement and refine the coding framework. Minor refinements were made to

clarify conceptual boundaries between closely related categories, such as informal

cooperation pathways and early lawful information-sharing mechanisms. All adjustments

to the coding framework were documented in a research decision log to ensure

transparency and strengthen the credibility of the analytical process.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

3.5 Trustworthiness and Validity To ensure methodological rigor, the study applies the qualitative research criteria

proposed by Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba, which include credibility, dependability,

confirmability, and transferability.

3.5.1 Credibility

Credibility was strengthened through methodological triangulation across interviews,

documents, and academic literature. Where feasible, participant validation was conducted

by sharing selected findings with interviewees to confirm the accuracy of interpretations.

Peer debriefing and intercoder verification also supported the credibility of the analysis.

3.5.2 Dependability

Dependability was ensured through systematic documentation of the research process.

Detailed records were maintained regarding data collection procedures, coding decisions,

and analytical steps so that the research process can be transparently evaluated and

potentially replicated.

3.5.3 Confirmability

Confirmability was supported through reflexive practices in which the researcher

recorded potential biases and assumptions in analytic memos. The use of direct interview

quotations and triangulated evidence also helped ensure that findings were grounded in

empirical data rather than personal interpretations.

3.5.4 Transferability

Transferability was enhanced by providing detailed contextual descriptions of

institutional settings and cooperation mechanisms. Although the study does not aim for

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

statistical generalization, the findings may offer analytical insights that can inform similar

international policing contexts.

3.6 Ethical Considerations Ethical considerations were central to this study involving human participants. All

participants were informed about the purpose of the study, the nature of their

participation, and their right to withdraw from the research at any stage without penalty.

Participants provided informed consent prior to the interviews.

Ethical approval for the research was obtained from the relevant university research ethics

committee, and all procedures complied with institutional ethical standards for research

involving human participants.

To protect participant confidentiality, identifying information was removed from all

transcripts and analytical materials. Participants were assigned pseudonyms or numerical

codes, and all quotations used in the study were anonymized to prevent identification.

All digital recordings and transcripts were stored securely on password-protected and

encrypted devices accessible only to the research team. Hard copies of research notes

were stored in locked storage. Research data will be retained only for the period required

by institutional policies and will subsequently be securely deleted or destroyed.

The study also adheres to principles of academic integrity. All sources are properly cited,

and research findings are presented honestly without fabrication, falsification, or selective

reporting.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

3.7 Study Limitations Despite efforts to ensure methodological rigor, several limitations should be

acknowledged.

First, access to primary data may be limited due to the sensitive nature of international

policing cooperation. As a result, some aspects of cooperation mechanisms may not be

fully observable, and reliance on publicly available institutional materials may introduce

selection bias.

Second, interview-based research is subject to self-report bias. Participants may

emphasize successful initiatives while underreporting challenges or failures.

Triangulation with documentary evidence was therefore used to mitigate this limitation,

although some institutional perspectives may remain partially concealed.

Third, international policing cooperation is a rapidly evolving field influenced by

changing political and security contexts. Findings therefore reflect the institutional

environment during the period of data collection and may evolve as cooperation

frameworks change.

Finally, qualitative interpretation always carries a risk of researcher bias. Reflexive

practices and transparent documentation of analytical decisions were employed to

mitigate this risk.

In addition, the empirical focus on Dubai, Gulf-based policing initiatives, and European

institutional partners means that the findings primarily reflect these regional cooperation

structures. The results should therefore be understood as analytically transferable rather

than statistically generalizable to all global policing systems.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

This chapter outlined the methodology used to investigate the role of soft power in

international policing cooperation. Through a multiple-case study design and data

triangulation (interviews and documents), the study established a robust methodological

foundation that supports the credibility and reliability of the findings presented in Chapter

Four.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Chapter 4 Results

4.1 Introduction This chapter presents the study's empirical results on soft power in cross-border policing

cooperation. It organizes findings thematically and maps them to the study objectives and

research questions. The analysis draws on 15 semi-structured interviews with

practitioners and experts, as well as primary institutional documents from INTERPOL

and Europol. This chapter describes findings across five main themes: capability and

fairness as attraction; exchanges and training as trust engines; summits and informal

pathways as accelerators; governance and rights as legitimacy multipliers; barriers and

enablers that mediate these dynamics; and a specific subsection on Dubai and the Gulf.

Each theme includes interview evidence, documentary sources, and commentary,

concluding with reference to the theoretical framework.

4.2 Participants and Data Corpus Fifteen interviews were conducted with participants possessing direct experience in

international policing cooperation, including liaison officers, training coordinators,

regional cooperation leads, and policy analysts. Official reports, programming

documents, competency frameworks, and resolutions from INTERPOL and Europol that

structure cooperation and training practice were also analyzed.

Table 4-1: Participant Overview and Data Sources.

ID Region or focus Primary lens in interview Transcript Reference

P1 Global Trust building through daily

liaison work

Transcript 1

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

P2 EU Exchanges and embedded task

forces

Transcript 2

P3 APAC Multi-year capacity building and

alumni networks

Transcript 3

P4 EU and Africa Summit corridor networking and

JITs

Transcript 4

P5 GCC link Mixed patrols and information

exchange

Transcript 5

P6 EU Data governance and admissibility Transcript 6

P7 Global Platforms and trust as earned

cooperation

Transcript 7

P8 Global Legitimacy and soft authority Transcript 8

P9 Global Technical help as soft power Transcript 9

P10 EU perimeter Interoperability and common

training

Transcript 10

P11 Global Reciprocity and rapid informal

channels

Transcript 11

P12 Global Public-facing communication and

portals

Transcript 12

P13 Dubai and GCC Event diplomacy and innovation

leadership

Transcript 13

P14 Africa Culturally sensitive mentoring Transcript 14

P15 EU and global Norms, risks, and metrics Transcript 15

As Table 4.1 illustrates, the sample encompasses diverse organizational roles and

geographic perspectives, strengthening the explanatory power of the findings. The

emphasis on liaison work, training design, platform governance, and Gulf innovation

aligns directly with the study's scope, which focuses on operational soft power

mechanisms rather than general opinion.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

4.3 Theme One: Capability and Fairness as Foundations of Attraction

The interviews converge on a central conclusion: soft power operates in policing because

partners respond to demonstrated capability, impartiality, and adherence to legal

procedure. When these qualities are present, agencies share information more readily and

act on requests more quickly. Participants conceptualize soft power not as abstract appeal

but as attraction generated through professionalism, reliable assistance, and perceived

fairness. They associate it with faster response times, accelerated provision of

investigative leads, and greater willingness to participate in joint operations. Institutions

gain cooperation, respondents emphasize, by projecting predictability, rights-respecting

conduct, and technical helpfulness.

Table 4-2: Evidence for Theme One.

Code element Salient evidence in interviews Source

Attraction through

capability

Partners respond faster when a unit is known

for high-quality forensics or analytics.

Transcript 9;

Transcript 11

Neutrality and

fairness

A reputation for non-politicized action

increases uptake of requests

Transcript 7;

Transcript 6

Lawful and

transparent process

Clear safeguards make agencies comfortable

sharing sensitive data

Transcript 6;

Transcript 12

Reputation and

esteem

Public recognition of joint successes leads to

later prioritization

Transcript 4;

Transcript 13

These patterns suggest that when partner agencies perceive an institution as technically

competent, politically nonpartisan, and procedurally trustworthy, they respond more

readily and with higher-quality information. Soft power in this context operates not

through symbolic image alone but through accumulated evidence that a partner's requests

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

are lawful, proportionate, and likely to yield results without imposing political or legal

costs on the responding agency.

4.3.1 Illustrative Interview Excerpts

"Reliability and respect for rules are our real persuasion tools. When colleagues know we

handle their data properly and follow through, they pick up the phone faster." (P7)

"Our strongest argument is that when we ask, we also help—with timely, high-quality

analysis. That creates a cycle: they give because they know they will get back." (P9)

"Neutrality matters enormously. If you're seen as pushing a political agenda, even your

best technical work becomes suspect. Partners will route around you." (P6)

The value participants place on capability and rights-respecting conduct finds institutional

expression in reforms such as INTERPOL's data processing updates and Europol's

platform modernization. These changes codify lawful handling and technical reliability

as cooperation resources. Responsible artificial intelligence guidelines and biometric data

hubs were described by participants not merely as operational improvements but as

signals that reassure partners—and therefore as soft power assets. These findings support

Nye's proposition that attraction is rooted in credible values and policies, but they extend

his argument by demonstrating that in policing, attraction is institutionalized through

verifiable procedures, auditability, and service delivery rather than cultural diplomacy

alone (Nye, 2004).

4.4 Theme Two: Officer Exchanges and Training as Trust Engines

Training ecosystems and officer exchanges function as trust engines because they

generate shared professional practices, interpersonal relationships, and durable working

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

routines that persist despite personnel rotations and policy shifts. Respondents described

multi-week academy programs, embedded secondments, and joint team deployments as

mechanisms that dismantle stereotypes, build alumni networks, and create a common

operational language. They emphasized that effective training must be iterative,

incorporate mentoring, and maintain connections to real operational contexts.

Table 4-3: Reported Exchange and Training Benefits.

Benefit How participants describe the effect Source

Shared vocabulary

and methods

Common templates and role

competencies reduce friction

Transcript 2;

Transcript 3

Alum networks Alumni answer calls quickly and

escalate internally

Transcript 3;

Transcript 11

Cultural fluency Exposure to partners’ constraints

raises empathy and realism

Transcript 14;

Transcript 10

Operational speed Familiarity shortens the path from lead

to joint action

Transcript 2;

Transcript 4

The converging accounts indicate that sustained interaction and structured educational

programs transform abstract commitments into habitual, repeatable operational

collaboration. Common vocabulary, cohort identity, and mentoring relationships help

officers overcome uncertainty, reduce negotiation time, and activate cooperation

precisely when it is most needed.

4.4.1 Illustrative Interview Excerpts

"Secondments turn names into colleagues, so a call for help is not cold. You're not asking

a stranger; you're asking someone you sat next to in briefings." (P2)

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

"Mentoring cohorts means the trust survives staff changes. When your contact rotates out,

their successor already knows you because the shared experience is institutionalized."

(P14)

"The real value of joint training is the informal network it creates. We have WhatsApp

groups from courses five years ago that still light up when someone needs urgent

assistance." (P3)

"Common templates and role definitions mean we don't waste time explaining basic

capabilities. Everyone knows what a cybercrime analyst can do, so we move straight to

the case." (P10)

The Europol Cybercrime Training Competency Framework exemplifies this process in

documentary form, outlining interoperable roles and skills across jurisdictions.

Interviewees noted that such harmonization is a precondition for effective cooperation

because it minimizes misunderstandings about expectations and capabilities. Trust, in this

view, is anchored in shared professional norms rather than goodwill alone. This theme

aligns with Melissen's emphasis on relationship-based public diplomacy, demonstrating

that long-term interpersonal and institutional connections within policing communities

function as soft power mechanisms that reduce coordination costs and foster voluntary

alignment (Melissen, 2005).

4.5 Theme Three: Summits and Informal Agreements as Cooperation Accelerators

International policing summits and informal agreements accelerate cooperation by

establishing shared agendas in public forums while simultaneously seeding rapid bilateral

pathways in private. Participants explained that plenary sessions align language and

priorities across large groups, while corridor conversations produce contact lists, working

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

groups, and early operational commitments. Informal protocols enable lawful preliminary

information sharing while formal mutual legal assistance procedures run their course.

Table 4-4: Reported Functions of Summits and Informal Arrangements.

Function Practice described by participants Source

Agenda setting Common threat framing and next step lists Transcript 4;

Transcript 13

Network

formation

Corridor introductions become operational

contact lists

Transcript 1;

Transcript 7

Early lawful

sharing

Informal protocols enable quick exchange

pending formalities

Transcript 11;

Transcript 6

Visibility and

esteem

Publicly acknowledged cooperation raises

willingness to help later

Transcript 4;

Transcript 13

These functions characterize summits and informal arrangements as accelerators that

translate existing trust and attraction into concrete collaborative action. Public agenda

setting builds consensus on priorities, while corridor meetings and informal protocols

create direct channels that facilitate early lawful exchange and faster operational

responses.

4.5.1 Illustrative Interview Excerpts

"The real work happens after the plenary, when you find the three people you will call in

the next six months. That's where cooperation is born." (P4)

"A brief preview on good-faith channels can buy time while the paperwork processes. If

you trust the person, you share enough to keep the investigation moving." (P11)

"When your cooperation is publicly acknowledged at a summit, it signals to everyone that

you're a reliable partner. Other agencies take notice and reach out." (P13)

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

"The formal agenda matters, but the side sessions are where we solve problems. That's

where we agree on who does what before the next case lands." (P1)

Participant testimonies find institutional reflection in INTERPOL General Assembly

practices, which emphasize lawful data processing, and in Europol's strategic priorities.

The Europol Programming Document explicitly identifies the agency's convening and

platform functions as strategic priorities: serving as the European Union's information

hub, delivering real-time operational support, providing platforms for European policing

solutions, convening partners, leading innovation, and modeling organizational

excellence. These priorities institutionalize the accelerators that interviewees attributed

to summits and informal engagements. The findings confirm transgovernmental network

theory by demonstrating how recurrent convening produces horizontal professional

networks, while enriching Nye's framework by indicating that convening authority itself

becomes attractive when it reliably delivers operational shortcuts (Legrand & Leuprecht,

2021; Nye, 2004).

4.6 Theme Four: Governance, Rights, and Data as Legitimacy Multipliers

Data governance frameworks and rights safeguards function as legitimacy multipliers

because they reduce partner agencies' risk exposure and increase their willingness to share

sensitive information and participate in complex joint operations. Participants described

the value of clear admissibility rules, transparent audit trails, privacy protections, and

independent oversight mechanisms. They emphasized that compliance with these

frameworks is not a bureaucratic burden but a persuasive signal that the partnership

respects both legal obligations and individual rights.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Table 4-5: Governance and Rights Elements that Shape Cooperation.

Element Cooperation Impact According to Participants

Source

Clear data rules Confidence to share earlier and with fewer

caveats

Transcript 6;

Transcript 7

Auditability Trust that data handling will withstand scrutiny Transcript 6;

Transcript 12

Rights oversight Increased legitimacy with both officials and the

public

Transcript 8;

Transcript 12

Harmonization aids Eurojust templates and practice notes ease the

mismatch

Transcript 6

Respondents consistently assigned a facilitative role to strong data governance rather

than viewing it as an obstacle. Clarity, documented procedures, and standardized

templates reduce legal uncertainty and reputational risk, making initial collaboration safer

for cautious agencies and their legal counsel.

4.6.1 Illustrative Interview Excerpts

"Once the rules are clear, people stop hesitating and start sharing what matters. Ambiguity

is the enemy of cooperation." (P6)

"We move faster when I can point to a published policy that spells out audit trails and

oversight. My counsel signs off more quickly, and my counterparts are less defensive."

(P12)

"Rights-respecting process is a signal of professional maturity. It persuades in a way that

a purely technical promise cannot." (P7)

"We have fewer stops and restarts when partners trust our handling protocols. No one

worries that evidence will be excluded later." (P6)

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Resolution Number Eight, adopted by the INTERPOL Ninety-First General Assembly,

approved amendments to the INTERPOL Rules on the Processing of Data, with

implementation staggered through late 2024. The resolution tasks the General Secretariat

with maintaining technical developments aligned with these rules and provides member

countries with updated policies and procedures. These actions correspond directly to

interview accounts describing governance not as a constraint on cooperation but as a

precondition that reduces hesitation. The findings extend smart power concepts to the

policing domain, suggesting that credible legal frameworks and oversight mechanisms

enable agencies to combine necessary enforcement powers with persuasive legitimacy,

thereby protecting reputational assets while maintaining operational effectiveness

(Wilson, 2008).

4.7 Theme Five: Barriers and Enablers in Cross-Border Policing Cooperation

The data reveal recurring barriers that slow or obstruct cooperation, while also identifying

practical enablers that help overcome these frictions. Participants cited sovereignty

concerns, legal heterogeneity, personnel rotation, capacity gaps, language differences,

and equipment interoperability as persistent obstacles. They reported that long-term

deployments, alumni ecosystems, shared platforms, and visible quick wins help mitigate

these challenges.

Table 4-6: Reported Barriers and Enablers of Cooperation.

Category Item Reported effect Source

Barrier Sovereignty

reflex

Reluctance to act on foreign

requests

Transcript 6;

Transcript 15

Barrier Legal

heterogeneity

Delays in evidence

movement

Transcript 6;

Transcript 10

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Barrier Staff rotation Loss of personal ties and

history

Transcript 2;

Transcript 11

Barrier Capacity gaps Uneven pace and quality of

response

Transcript 3;

Transcript 5

Enabler Long

deployments

Relationships survive

turnover

Transcript 14

Enabler Alum networks Rapid informal escalation Transcript 2;

Transcript 11

Enabler Shared platforms Predictable workflows and

security

Transcript 7;

Transcript 9

Enabler Quick wins A reputation that draws

future help

Transcript 4;

Transcript 13

These patterns emphasize that soft power gains are easily eroded if sovereignty concerns,

legal fragmentation, rapid rotation, or capacity gaps remain unaddressed. However,

specific enablers such as extended deployments, alumni networks, shared secure

platforms, and demonstrable joint successes sustain collaboration.

4.7.1 Illustrative Interview Excerpts

"Even friendly partners hesitate when a request appears to sidestep domestic authority.

You must present the ask in a way that honors their process." (P6)

"Two good teams can lose weeks if they map evidence to different procedural calendars.

Legal heterogeneity is a silent killer of momentum." (P10)

"Every rotation resets the clock unless you have an alumni backbone that carries the

memory forward." (P11)

"Some partners cannot absorb a complex template quickly, so we pare down the first ask

and build up from there. Capacity-sensitive design matters." (P3)

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

"A quick win—a successful joint operation, a recovered asset—becomes part of your

reputation. People want to work with agencies that deliver." (P4)

The Europol Programming Document clarifies updates to the EMPACT cycle (European

Multidisciplinary Platform Against Criminal Threats), including the shift to biennial

Operational Action Plans and enhanced flexibility to adjust actions during emergencies.

These governance changes address some of the legal and planning friction that

interviewees reported, creating space for faster alignment during dynamic threat

situations. This theme underscores that soft power in policing is conditional: attraction

and trust produce cooperation most reliably where minimum legal compatibility,

organizational memory, and technical interoperability exist. This finding echoes insights

from liberal institutionalism and transgovernmental network theory regarding the

importance of rules and repeated interaction in sustaining cooperation (Ramli & Idris,

2022; Legrand & Leuprecht, 2021).

Figure 4-1: Thematic Map of Soft Power Mechanisms in Policing Cooperation.

4.8 Dubai and Gulf-Focused Results The Dubai and Gulf region material reveals that event diplomacy, innovation leadership,

and generous knowledge sharing function as particularly effective soft power levers,

enabling local agencies to attract partners and accelerate cross-border cooperation.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Participants from Dubai Police and regional institutions highlighted the World Police

Summit as an anchor event that generates durable networks. They also observed that

Dubai's reputation for advanced public services and technological innovation attracts

study delegations, which in turn translate into operational calls particularly in financial

crime and fugitive cases. Respondents further noted that public communication of joint

successes strengthens Dubai's brand as a predictable and effective partner.

Table 4-7: Dubai and Gulf-Specific Mechanisms and Outcomes.

Mechanism Description from interviews

Cooperation effect Source

Event

diplomacy

Hosting world-class policing

summits with targeted side

sessions

Dense networks and

aligned agendas

Transcript 13;

Transcript 4

Innovation

leadership

Sharing practice on

innovative policing

platforms and labs

Attraction and

requests for

partnership

Transcript 13

Knowledge

generosity

Training visits and technical

demonstrations

Goodwill that

converts to rapid

help

Transcript 13;

Transcript 2

Public

narrative

Co-branded announcements

of joint results

A reputation that

secures future

priority

Transcript 13;

Transcript 12

These descriptions position Dubai and the broader Gulf programs as exemplars of

performance-based soft power. Event diplomacy, visible innovation, and conspicuous

generosity in knowledge sharing place local agencies on partners' shortlists for

collaboration. However, participants also noted that the sustainability of this approach

depends on combining high-profile events and technological showcases with inclusive

training, interoperable systems, and genuine respect for partners' operational constraints.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

4.8.1 Illustrative Interview Excerpts

"When we host and share, people see how we work and call us first the next time. The

World Police Summit isn't just a conference—it's where relationships become

operations." (P13)

"Dubai Police has built a reputation for innovation that makes people want to partner.

They come to see the technology, but they stay because they trust the people." (P4)

"The public announcements of joint successes matter. When your minister praises a

partner by name, that partner's leadership notices. They become more willing to prioritize

your future requests." (P12)

"Training visits are soft power in action. Officers who spend a week in Dubai go home as

informal ambassadors. They know who to call when a case crosses borders." (P2)

The Dubai and Gulf findings offer an applied example of how soft power strategies can

be embedded in policing practice. They reinforce Nye's emphasis on attraction and

Melissen's focus on long-term relationships, while providing empirical substance to

debates on Gulf soft power and regional security leadership (Nye, 2004; Melissen, 2005;

Chaziza & Lutmar, 2025). The case demonstrates that sustained investment in convening

capacity, technological demonstration, and knowledge transfer can generate measurable

cooperation benefits but also that these gains require ongoing reinforcement through

inclusive practice and reciprocal engagement.

4.9 Cross-Theme Synthesis and Pattern Matrix The five themes interlock in ways that explain cooperation performance. Capability and

fairness generate initial attraction; training and exchanges transform that attraction into

durable networks; summits and informal pathways activate those networks rapidly when

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

needed; governance and rights frameworks stabilize information sharing by reducing risk;

and targeted enablers counter known frictions that would otherwise erode cooperation.

Table 4-8: Theme Alignment with Study Objectives and Research Questions.

Objective or RQ

Theme One

Theme Two Theme Three

Theme Four

Theme Five

Obj 1 and

RQ1: Role

of soft

power

High

contributi

through

attraction

and

reliability

Supports role

operationalizin

g attraction

Provides

public and

private

venues to

convert into

an attraction

Legitimacy

multiplies

attraction

Enablers

keep gains

under strain

Obj 2 and

RQ2:

Training

and

exchanges

Indirectly

through

esteem

Directly as trust

engines

Summits

announce

and scale

programs

Rights-

aware

curricula

increase

buy-in

Alum

ecosystems

mitigate

rotation

Obj 3 and

RQ2 and

RQ4:

Summits

and

informal

pathways

Builds the

narrative

that

summits

amplify

Alums feed

corridor

outcomes

High-

impact

accelerators

cooperation

Clear rules

make early

sharing safe

Quick wins

sustain

momentum

Obj 4 and

RQ3:

Challenges

Attraction

erodes if

fairness is

doubted

Training gaps

and rotation

weaken

networks

Over-

promising

at summits

without

follow-

through

Legal

mismatch

and privacy

concerns

block the

flow

Enablers

that matter

are long

deployment

s and shared

platforms

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Obj 5 and

RQ5: Policy

measures

Invest in

visible

capability

and

fairness

Build multi-

year exchange

ecosystems

Curate

summits for

corridor

outcomes

Standardize

lawful

processes

and audits

Fund alums,

hubs, and

language

support

The matrix clarifies that soft power mechanisms operate as a sequential system. Credible

capability and fairness attract; exchanges and training consolidate networks; summits and

informal pathways accelerate the use of those networks; governance frameworks stabilize

cooperation under pressure; and targeted enablers mitigate structural barriers. This

layered pattern aligns with the theoretical proposition that soft power becomes most

effective when institutionalized through repeated interaction, codified safeguards, and

visible reciprocity rather than treated as a purely symbolic asset (Nye, 2004; Wilson,

2008; Legrand & Leuprecht, 2021).

4.10 Summary of Results The findings demonstrate that soft power operates effectively in cross-border policing

through five interconnected mechanisms:

First, attraction is generated through demonstrated capability, political neutrality, and

adherence to lawful procedure. Agencies known for technical competence and fair

dealing receive faster responses and higher-quality information from partners.

Second, this attraction is transformed into durable human networks and shared

professional practice through sustained investment in officer exchanges, joint training,

and alumni ecosystems. These trust engines create relationships that survive personnel

rotation and policy shifts.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Third, international summits and informal pathways mobilize these networks rapidly

when operational needs arise. Public agenda setting aligns priorities, while corridor

conversations and informal protocols enable early lawful sharing before formal

mechanisms conclude.

Fourth, governance frameworks and rights safeguards function as legitimacy multipliers.

Clear data rules, audit trails, and oversight mechanisms reduce partner risk and increase

willingness to share sensitive information transforming legal compliance from obstacle

into enabler.

Fifth, persistent barriers such as sovereignty concerns, legal heterogeneity, personnel

rotation, and capacity gaps can erode soft power gains, but targeted enablers mitigate

these effects. Long deployments, alumni networks, shared platforms, and visible quick

wins sustain cooperation by institutionalizing trust beyond individual relationships.

The Dubai and Gulf findings provide an applied illustration of these mechanisms. Event

diplomacy, innovation leadership, and generous knowledge sharing position local

agencies as attractive partners, generating measurable cooperation benefits. However,

sustainability requires that high-profile initiatives be complemented by inclusive training,

interoperable systems, and genuine reciprocity.

The empirical patterns confirm that soft power in policing is not merely rhetorical. It

comprises a set of operational choices that embed attraction and trust into institutions,

networks, and procedures. These findings provide a concrete foundation for the

theoretical and policy analysis developed in Chapter Five, which will discuss implications

for scholarship and practice, address study limitations, and propose directions for future

research.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Table 4-9: Summary of Soft Power Mechanisms and Cooperation Outcomes. Mechanism

category Specific

mechanisms Primary

cooperation outcomes

Linked themes and theory

Capability

and fairness

Technical support,

analytical quality,

neutrality, and

lawful procedures

Faster responses,

higher quality

information,

prioritization of

requests

Theme One: supports

Nye’s attraction through

credible policies

Trust

ecosystems

Officer exchanges,

secondments, joint

academies, and

alumni networks

Durable

interpersonal ties,

reduced negotiation

time, resilience

across rotations

Theme Two aligns with

Melissen’s relationship-

based diplomacy

Convening

and pathways

Summits, side

sessions, liaison

corridors, informal

protocols

Early lawful

sharing, rapid

contact activation,

shared agendas

Theme Three: reflects

transgovernmental

networks and

institutional soft power

Governance

and rights

Data protection

rules, audit trails,

oversight, and

harmonized

templates

Increased

confidence, reduced

legal risk, sustained

use of channels

Theme Four: refines

smart power for policing

Targeted

enablers

Long deployments,

shared platforms,

quick wins,

capacity support

Mitigation of

sovereignty and

capacity gaps,

stabilization of

cooperation

Theme Five: shows the

conditionality of soft

power effectiveness]

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Chapter 5 Discussion

5.1 Introduction This chapter moves from description to interpretation, arguing that soft power in policing

is not a symbolic supplement to hard power, but an operational necessity that determines

the speed, depth, and resilience of cross-border cooperation. By weaving together

interview evidence, institutional documents, and theoretical lenses, the discussion reveals

how attraction, trust, and legitimacy are systematically engineered through concrete

mechanisms, and why getting them right is as important as formal treaties.

The chapter interprets the findings on how soft power influences cross-border policing

cooperation through attraction, trust, and joint practice. It relates the findings to the

theoretical model on soft power, public diplomacy, and smart power, demonstrating how

these conceptions apply to policing organizations that must work together without

coercion (Nye, 2004). It also addresses lessons applied to policy and leadership in

practice, with a sustained focus on Dubai and the Gulf. Lastly, it reflects on

methodological decisions, integrates the documentary corpus with interview evidence,

and identifies future research directions. To guide the reader, the discussion explicitly

maps each section to the research questions: RQ1 addresses how soft power strategies

contribute to cooperation, RQ2 examines the roles of officer exchanges, training, and

summits, RQ3 explores obstacles, RQ4 explains how INTERPOL and Europol leverage

soft power, and RQ5 converts the evidence into policy measures.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

5.2 Interpreting Key Findings in Relation to The Research Questions

This section analyzes each set of findings concerning the research questions guiding the

study. It relies upon interview evidence and primary documents to describe what the

patterns entail and why they are important.

5.2.1 How Soft Power Strategies Contribute to Cooperation (RQ1)

According to Nye's relational view of power, cooperation via attraction depends on

credibility and predictability. This explains why partners share information faster when

they trust each other's reliable processes and neutral stance (Nye, 2004). The findings

show that attraction built on capability, neutrality, and due process increases the speed

and reliability of cross-border cooperation. The findings demonstrate that soft power

plays a role in cooperation because partners value professionalism, neutrality, and legal

process; hence, they share information sooner and act more quickly. Participants

consistently state that attraction is determined by reliable technical support and procedural

predictability. This attraction correlates with foreign counterparts' willingness to

prioritize requests and assume joint working positions (Transcript 7; Transcript 9;

Transcript 6).

This trend aligns with the theoretical argument that attraction and credibility reduce the

cost of collective action and amplify voluntary congruence (Nye, 2004). Further, this

effect is enhanced by institutional adherence to rights and open governance since they

mitigate perceptions of risk and maintain reputational capital among officials and the

public (Transcript 8; Transcript 12). This finding is consistent with recent institutional

documents stating that lawful data processing and rights oversight facilitate information

exchange rather than impede it (INTERPOL, 2023; Europol, 2024a).

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

However, a minority of participants argued that attraction alone is insufficient in high-

threat contexts without parallel coercive tools; they reported instances where partners

admired capability but still withheld data until formal legal assurances arrived (Transcript

6; Transcript 15). This caution refines RQ1 by suggesting that attraction performs best

when paired with clear, pre-agreed safeguards. This elaboration proves that while Nye

attributes attraction to credibility and perceived legitimacy, in the policing field attraction

is formulated less through cultural symbolism and more through functional confidence,

foreseeable protection, and provable procedural fairness. By so doing, the results build

on Nye's argument by demonstrating that trusted technical platforms and early legal

sharing protocols can be treated as tangible soft power assets in cross-border policing

cooperation, as opposed to intangible diplomatic cues.

5.2.2 The Role of Officer Exchanges, Training, and Summits (RQ2)

Public diplomacy theory suggests that sustained interpersonal contact and mutual learning

build trust as a form of influence (Yew-woei, 2023). This explains why officer exchanges

and joint trainings serve as trust engines, converting personal rapport into durable

cooperative networks. The findings suggest that exchanges and training operate as trust

engines, while summits convert trust into actionable networks through public alignment

and private corridor building.

The results show that officer exchanges and training programs are trust engines since they

establish common language, interpersonal relationships, and repeatable workflows that

are not destroyed by staff rotations. Respondents credit secondments, academy cohorts,

and embedded task forces with turning contacts into colleagues and converting abstract

commitments into daily co-development of cases (Transcript 2, Transcript 3, Transcript

11). This interpretation fits the new public diplomacy emphasis on relationship building

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

and mutual learning as sources of influence and cooperation (Melissen, 2005). It also

aligns with the Europol cybercrime competency framework that defines common skills

and roles, reducing joint work friction (Europol, 2024b).

The results further show that summits and conferences accelerate cooperation because

they set public agendas and seed private corridors that generate working groups and quick

bilateral pathways (Transcript 4; Transcript 13). In practice, plenary narratives legitimize

shared priorities, while corridor exchanges deliver the phone numbers and tacit protocols

that enable early lawful sharing before formal instruments conclude. Two interviewees

cautioned that short, ceremonial exchanges deliver limited value if not embedded in

multi-month deployments; they observed that "graduation photos without shared tooling"

did not change everyday behavior (Transcript 10; Transcript 11). This view underscores

that duration and operational embedding condition the effect of RQ2 mechanisms.

5.2.3 Challenges That Hinder Soft Power Approaches (RQ3)

Fernandes (2024) cautions that soft power is fragile when partners perceive bias or opaque

practices. This explains why legal mismatches, sovereignty reflexes, and capacity gaps

undermine trust and slow cross-border cooperation. The findings indicate that legal

heterogeneity, sovereignty reflex, rotation, and capacity gaps systematically slow

cooperation, though standardized processes and alumni ecosystems mitigate these effects.

Common barriers were identified in the data. Legal heterogeneity and sovereignty reflex

result in slow movement of evidence and reduced confidence in preliminary sharing.

Rotation compromises institutional memory and dilutes alumni connections unless

leaders engage in longer deployments and alumni ecosystems. Language and

interoperability tensions cause daily friction that slows operations (Transcript 6;

Transcript 10; Transcript 2). These results align with cautions in the literature that soft

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

power is weak when partners feel discriminated against, when processes are considered

opaque, or when over-reliance on showcasing creates reputational costs that render

cooperation unsustainable (Mutz & Simmons, 2022). Transparent rights practices and

standardized platforms minimize these barriers since cooperation becomes safer and more

predictable.

A small subset reported that emergency contexts reduced legal friction because crisis

salience created temporary political will to share early (Transcript 4). However, they

added that such acceleration is fragile and unsustainable without codified templates,

reinforcing the need to institutionalize early lawful sharing.

5.2.4 How Organizations Like INTERPOL and Europol Leverage Soft Power (RQ4)

As Nye (2004) notes, international institutions wield soft power by attracting cooperation

through shared norms and credibility rather than coercion. This explains how INTERPOL

and Europol use neutral platforms and convening power to encourage voluntary

information-sharing among member states. The findings show that INTERPOL and

Europol leverage convening power, platform reliability, and rights-anchored governance

to attract cooperation they cannot compel.

The data indicate that these organizations rely on platform superiority, convening

strength, and rights-grounded governance to achieve cooperation that cannot be enforced.

Participants indicate that the methods of attraction that make partners willing to

communicate and share include training standards, common tools and hubs (INTERPOL's

I-24/7 and notice system), and European programming priorities (Transcript 7; Transcript

6; Transcript 2). This comprehension aligns with strategic reports positioning these

agencies as information centers, enabling allies and conveners rather than coercive

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

powers (INTERPOL, 2023; Europol, 2024a). Consequently, perceived neutrality and

platform reliability are soft power resources in themselves.

One respondent argued that perceived regional bias can briefly erode neutrality,

especially during politically sensitive cases, which then requires explicit rights messaging

and third-party oversight to restore confidence (Transcript 12). This suggests that RQ4

mechanisms depend on continuous reputation management.

5.2.5 Policy Measures That Enhance Soft Power in Policing (RQ5)

According to Wilson's (2008) concept of smart power, effective strategies combine

persuasive narrative with tangible capabilities. This suggests that enhancing police soft

power requires pairing attractive communication with concrete technical support and

legal safeguards. The findings justify five measures, exchange ecosystems, summit

design for operations, standardized early sharing, reliable technical assistance, and joint

communication, each mapped to a specific barrier or enabler.

The results support several concrete actions. Leaders should invest in multi-year

exchange ecosystems including mentoring and alumni networks because these maintain

relationships across rotations. Agencies should plan summits for corridor outcomes by

arranging specific side sessions and developing prominent post-event follow-up. Beyond

audit trails, organizations must codify early legal sharing in templates that conform to

data protection rules. Finally, agencies should leverage public communication by

celebrating mutual success that develops reputational capital without jeopardizing

operational security (Transcript 2; Transcript 11; Transcript 12; Transcript 13). These

recommendations are guided by smart power reasoning, combining persuasive narrative

with credible capability and utilizing procedurally just practices (Wilson, 2008).

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Two participants warned that public communication can backfire if it appears self-

promotional; they recommended co-branded messages focused on safeguards and parity

of credit to avoid reputational risks (Transcript 12; Transcript 13). This nuance refines

RQ5 by tying communication style to legitimacy effects.

Figure 5-1: Mechanism Flow from Exchanges, Summits, and Governance to Policy

Outputs and Cooperation Outcomes.

5.3 Theoretical Implications This work extends soft power theory into international policing by demonstrating that

attraction operates through professional competence, lawful behavior, and procedural

fairness rather than solely through cultural appeal. Whereas Nye identifies attraction

primarily with cultural appeal and general foreign policy discourses, the current research

offers a complementary view. It indicates that operational trust in policing constitutes a

distinct form of soft power when partners perceive technical competence, law-abiding

behavior, and due process as both plausible and reliable.

The study validates Melissen's emphasis on relationship-based public diplomacy,

showing that officer exchanges, joint academies, and alumni networks function as long-

term socialization mechanisms. These mechanisms transform recurring contact into

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

durable collaboration rather than sporadic symbolism (Melissen, 2005). The evidence

also complicates smart power logic by revealing that coercive capacities do not

necessarily undermine soft power when agencies embed them within transparent, rights-

based governance. On the contrary, such judicious integration reassures partners and

sustains attraction (Wilson, 2008).

Three specific theoretical refinements emerge from the findings. First, technical support

and platform stability constitute soft power resources when partners perceive them as

credible and unbiased. Second, public diplomacy concepts apply directly to police-to-

police relations, since exchanges, mentoring, and joint academies create socialization

effects that persist over time. Third, the study refines smart power logic for policing by

revealing how non-coercive trust-building and necessary coercive tools can coexist

without reputational loss when leaders foreground rights and due process (Wilson, 2008).

These insights also speak to esteem-based influence theories because they illustrate how

credibility and professionalism translate into deference and voluntary alignment within

transgovernmental networks (Gallarotti, 2022). However, the findings introduce

important conditional qualifications: attraction is most effective when embedded in

codified safeguards, and short, symbolic exchanges have limited impact without

operational embedding. These conditions sharpen the mechanisms by which soft power

translates into cooperation and help specify when it is likely to succeed or stall.

5.4 Practical and Policy Implications The implications of the findings for governments, international organizations, and police

leaders are direct as they seek to enhance real-world cooperation through soft power.

Exchange programs, embedded secondments, alumni ecosystems, curated summits,

standardized templates for early lawful sharing, and transparent joint communication

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

strategies are not side activities but core tools. These mechanisms transform capability

and legitimacy into faster responses and stronger trust. By treating them as deliberate

policy instruments rather than ad hoc projects, institutions can build more resilient

cooperation architectures that align with international standards, respect rights, and

increase voluntary information exchange.

5.4.1 Design Exchange Ecosystems, Not Single Events

The evidence indicates that leaders should transform single courses into multi-year

ecosystems incorporating mentoring, alumni management, and rotational planning.

Leaders should assign responsibilities for alumni engagement and organize regular

reunions linked to live casework. This approach preserves trust and institutional memory

despite staff changes (Transcript 3; Transcript 14). It also aligns with competency

frameworks emphasizing that practice is a continuous process requiring consolidation

(Europol, 2024b). Where resource constraints prevent long secondments, agencies should

prioritize hybrid models combining shorter visits with persistent virtual teams and shared

tooling to maintain continuity (Transcript 10).

5.4.2 Curate Summits for Operational Outcomes

Planners should design summits with dedicated corridor time and specialized side

sessions enabling small working groups to address specific threats. They should announce

clear next steps publicly and establish light governance processes that maintain

momentum while formal paperwork proceeds. Participants emphasized that summits

without documented follow-through lose credibility; therefore, hosts should publish a

short action docket with responsible owners and 90-day milestones (Transcript 4).

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

5.4.3 Standardize Lawful Early Sharing

Agencies should develop templates for preliminary sharing through trusted channels

while formal mutual assistance instruments are processed. These templates must

incorporate data protection, retention rules, and audit trails to reassure partners at early

stages (Transcript 6; INTERPOL, 2023). This practice accelerates cooperation without

assuming greater risk. Where legal counsel resists preliminary sharing, agencies should

begin with narrowly scoped pilot templates including strict retention and sunset clauses

to build comfort before scaling (Transcript 6).

5.4.4 Use Public Communication as a Trust Signal

Agencies should develop co-branded messages acknowledging shared success,

explaining safeguards, and allocating credit equitably among partners. Such messaging

must demonstrate sensitivity to rights and transparency to build legitimacy with both

publics and professional counterparts (Transcript 12). This practice enhances reputational

capital that subsequently converts into priority action. To avoid perceived self-promotion,

agencies should pair any joint announcement with a plain-language note on safeguards

and lessons learned, ensuring parity of credit across partners (Transcript 13).

5.4.5 Dubai and Gulf-Specific Recommendations

Police forces in the Gulf should continue leveraging event diplomacy and innovation

leadership, as Dubai Police demonstrates in attracting partners and aligning agendas.

Agencies should sponsor thematic side events at major gatherings to develop working

groups and establish visiting fellow programs that place foreign officers within host units

for several months. They should also share information about service innovations

generously, as interviews associate such openness with rapid operational calls and strong

reciprocity (Transcript 13). These actions cement Dubai's role as a partner of choice.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

However, a few respondents warned that rapid scaling of showcase technologies without

shared training can create dependence rather than genuine partnership. Dubai should

therefore pair demonstrations with co-authored playbooks and open training modules

(Transcript 11). Such moves not only entrench Dubai's profile as a preferred partner but

also distinguish the United Arab Emirates from some regional counterparts who invest

substantially in showcase events without anchoring them in consistent, stable operational

partnerships. Unlike more securitized or inward-oriented models associated with other

Gulf actors, respondents viewed the UAE as integrating technological innovation,

convening capacity, and alumni-based networks in ways consistent with the structured

cooperation models of Europol and other European platforms.

Simultaneously, the research warns against rapidly expanding highly visible capabilities

without collective tooling, co-authored protocols, and inclusive training offers. Such

expansion risks reproducing patterns of performativity observed elsewhere, potentially

creating dependency rather than mutual partnership. Dubai must therefore carefully

balance innovation showcases with open playbooks, interoperable standards, and

inclusive training propositions.

5.4.6 Global Relevance for Trust, Governance, and Ethical Policing

The Dubai, Gulf, and European evidence speaks to broader international discussions

concerning trust, governance, and ethical dimensions of transnational policing. It

demonstrates that cross-border security cooperation becomes more legitimate and

sustainable when anchored in transparent processes rather than shrouded negotiation or

coercive logic. The study thus supports the proposition that soft power in policing cannot

be separated from ethical obligations: responsiveness to due process, human rights, and

non-discriminatory practice contributes simultaneously to normative legitimacy and

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

instrumental efficacy. The findings showing how willingness to cooperate is influenced

by operational decisions regarding data protection, audit trails, and joint messaging

contribute to emerging debates on regulating shared security infrastructures to prevent

politicization, safeguard vulnerable groups, and maintain citizen trust across boundaries.

Table 5-1: Findings to Policy Pipeline.

Empirical finding Mechanism Policy action

Attraction arises from

capability and fairness.

Early sharing and

faster response

Fund platform reliability, quality

labs, and rights oversight

Exchanges create

durable trust.

Alumni answer and

escalate quickly

Build multi-year exchange

ecosystems with mentoring and

reunions

Summits seed corridor

networks

Small teams with

shared goals emerge

Curate side sessions and track

delivery after events

Legal mismatch slows

cases.

Hesitation to share

persists

Standardize preliminary lawful

sharing templates with audit trails

Public narrative shapes

reputation.

Prioritization follows

recognition

Co-brand communications that

show safeguards and joint credit

5.5 Methodological Reflections and Source Integration This study employs a qualitative case-oriented design, prioritizing depth and explanation

over statistical generalization. Combining interviews and institutional documents

strengthens credibility through triangulation, yet several limitations warrant

acknowledgment. First, access to sensitive operational data remains limited; therefore,

some claims depend on participant self-reports that may reflect positive bias. Second,

personnel rotation may constrain retrospective information regarding past cases. Third,

the study sample focuses on organizations with well-documented practices, potentially

underrepresenting less resource-intensive agencies. The methodological approach

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

addresses these limitations by triangulating interview claims with official records,

sampling diverse roles across multiple regions, and maintaining a transparent audit trail

of coding decisions. These practices align with qualitative standards of trustworthiness

and inform cautious interpretation.

The thematic convergence between interview data and documentary sources is striking

across three critical issues. First, INTERPOL's data processing rules and Europol's

programming priorities provide official reference points that corroborate participant

perceptions of rights-congruent governance as a cooperation facilitator, confirming that

such governance increases sharing willingness (INTERPOL, 2023; Europol, 2024a).

Second, the Europol competency framework offers concrete validation of the training-to-

operations pipeline, reflecting participant emphasis on common roles and methods that

minimize friction (Europol, 2024b). Third, the soft power literature frames the primary

data by explaining how esteem, credibility, and voluntary alignment result from attractive

performance and demonstrated fairness rather than coercion (Nye, 2004). This

convergence substantially reinforces the study's assertions.

However, documentary emphasis on neutrality occasionally diverged from participant

perceptions in politically sensitive cases (Transcript 12), reminding us that institutional

texts and lived practice can temporarily part ways until reputational repair is undertaken.

Such disjunctures themselves constitute important data about the fragility of soft power

and the continuous work required to maintain it.

5.6 Directions for Future Research Future work can advance this agenda in four primary ways. First, researchers could

develop mixed methods designs combining qualitative network mapping with

quantitative measures of response times and information exchange volumes before and

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

after exchanges or summits. Such designs would enable more precise attribution of

cooperative outcomes to specific soft power interventions.

Second, comparative studies across regional architectures could test whether the

identified mechanisms hold in varied legal cultures and institutional environments.

Examining how civil law versus common law systems, or centralized versus decentralized

police structures, moderate soft power effects would significantly enrich theoretical

understanding.

Third, researchers should systematically investigate social media and public

communication strategies as intentional cooperation tools that shape professional

perceptions, not merely public opinion. The intersection of digital diplomacy and police

cooperation remains substantially undertheorized.

Fourth, Dubai-focused research should evaluate the long-term effects of event diplomacy

and visiting fellow programs on measurable cooperation outcomes in specific domains

such as financial crime investigation and fugitive pursuit. Longitudinal tracking of cases

involving alumni networks would provide valuable evidence of mechanism effectiveness.

Future studies should also test threshold conditions, including minimum exchange

duration and essential legal assurance packages, under which soft power reliably converts

to cooperation. Such research would address the minority views recorded here regarding

the conditional nature of attraction-based influence. Additionally, the influence of

emerging technologies on soft power relations within policing deserves systematic

exploration. Artificial intelligence-driven analytics, cross-border cyber policing units,

and digitally mediated liaison platforms create new arenas where technical reliability,

algorithmic transparency, and responsible data sharing will determine which agencies are

considered preferred partners. Digital diplomacy through professional social media,

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

secure virtual communities of practice, and remote training spaces may enhance or

diminish institutional reputations more rapidly than traditional media. Systematic study

of these developments will be essential for understanding how soft power is renegotiated

in an era where cooperation increasingly depends on interoperable digital infrastructures

and shared ethical foundations.

5.7 Conclusion This chapter has explained how soft power produces cooperation in international policing

by transforming capability, fairness, and convening power into attraction, trust, and

operational speed. It has shown that exchanges and training generate durable networks,

summits and informal pathways activate those networks, and rights-aligned governance

stabilizes sharing while reducing risk. The chapter has also provided concrete policy

measures for agencies seeking to enhance cooperation, with actionable guidance

specifically for Dubai and the Gulf region.

By explicitly tying each research question to convergent and divergent evidence, the

discussion has clarified where soft power mechanisms are most robust, where they require

embedding in safeguards, and how policy can target points where practice and principle

risk diverging. These interpretations now set the stage for the thesis conclusion, which

will synthesize the study's core contributions, present a final set of evidence-based

recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, and propose a future research

agenda building on the questions this study has opened.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

Chapter 6 Conclusion

6.1 Introduction This study set out to demonstrate that soft power in policing is not an abstract diplomatic

concept but a set of operational choices with tangible consequences for cross-border

cooperation. This concluding chapter synthesizes the evidence supporting that claim,

drawing together the main findings on how attraction, trust, and fairness shape

international police partnerships. It connects the empirical evidence with the soft-power

and public diplomacy literature, as well as the institutional practices of INTERPOL and

Europol. It draws coherent conclusions about the role of attraction, trust, and fairness in

policing cooperation, then outlines concrete policy recommendations. It also discusses

limitations of the research and proposes future work, showing how each limitation points

to a concrete next step.

6.2 Conclusions This paper demonstrates that soft power enhances cross-border policing since attraction,

credibility, and legal process render cooperation voluntary, timely, and recurrent. The

interviews and documents affirm five interrelated conclusions that respond directly to the

research questions and goals.

First, soft power functions through capability, impartiality, and procedural fairness.

Partners are quicker to respond to agencies that demonstrate reliable technical assistance,

unbiased behaviour, and observable safeguards; hence, there is greater voluntary

cooperation. This conclusion is consistent with the central hypothesis that attraction and

credibility reduce alignment costs in international relations (Nye, 2004; Gallarotti, 2022).

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

100

It also correlates with institutional commitments to lawful data processing that

participants reported as enabling measures rather than limiting ones (INTERPOL, 2023).

Second, officer exchanges and training ecosystems operate as trust engines. Multi-month

secondments, cohort-based academies, and embedded task forces create shared language,

stable social ties, and predictable workflows that persist across staff rotations. These

relationship-building practices reflect the logic of new public diplomacy, since regular

engagement and mutual learning cultivate long-term cooperation (Melissen, 2005). The

Europol competency framework further shows how common roles and skills reduce

friction in joint work (Europol, 2024b).

Third, summits and informal pathways accelerate cooperation. Plenary sessions publicly

align priorities, while corridor meetings provide the personal connections and early lawful

exchange that move cases forward before formal instruments are completed. Participants

repeatedly emphasized that small, focused working groups born in these settings generate

pragmatic momentum that formal channels alone cannot achieve.

Fourth, governance and rights function as legitimacy multipliers. Clear data policies,

audit mechanisms, and independent oversight increase partners' willingness to share

sensitive information and join complex operations. This finding aligns with the smart

power perspective, in which credibility and capability are jointly exercised without

reputational damage when leaders prioritise rights and due process (Wilson, 2008).

Fifth, obstacles persist but practical enablers exist. Sovereignty reflex, legal

heterogeneity, staff rotation, language barriers, and capacity gaps systematically slow

cooperation. However, prolonged deployments, shared technical platforms, and visible

joint successes compensate for such frictions and sustain momentum across challenging

contexts.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

101

This study extends soft power theory from the level of cultural attraction to the

organizational domain of policing by specifying how procedural reliability, rights-

anchored governance, and capability signalling operate as practical sources of attraction

that elicit voluntary cooperation. The findings integrate public diplomacy's emphasis on

relationship building with transgovernmental network theory, showing that officer

exchanges, liaison presence, and standardized platforms create predictability that lowers

partners' perceived risk and cost of action (Melissen, 2005; Legrand & Leuprecht, 2021).

The analysis refines smart power for policing by showing that persuasive legitimacy and

credible capacity can be combined without reputational loss when leaders foreground due

process and transparency (Wilson, 2008). Conceptually, the study links Nye's attraction-

based account to micro-level mechanisms in professional communities of practice where

esteem, credibility, and repeatable workflows convert into faster information sharing and

durable reciprocity (Nye, 2004; Gallarotti, 2022).

The above findings confirm that all research objectives have been met. The discussion

indicates that soft power strategies based on capability, fairness, and predictable

safeguards shape trust, legitimacy, and cooperation patterns in cross-border policing. It

describes how officer exchanges, long-term training ecosystems, and professional

summits serve as viable vehicles of attraction that maintain networks across individual

postings. It identifies the structural and normative challenges limiting soft power

strategies, such as sovereignty sensitivities, legal fragmentation, and capacity imbalances,

and reveals how these tensions are addressed in part through standardized processes. It

also makes clear how organizations like INTERPOL and Europol use convening power,

neutral platforms, and rights-based rules to secure voluntary cooperation. Lastly, it

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

102

produces evidence-based recommendations to convert these mechanisms into actionable

policies for agencies in the United Arab Emirates, the broader Gulf, and partner

jurisdictions.

6.3 Recommendations This section translates findings into actionable policy and practice guidelines for agencies

and partners, including Dubai and the Gulf region. The recommendations are organized

into seven core measures that reflect the study's findings and should be understood as

mutually supporting elements of a coherent soft power approach to cross-border policing.

6.3.1 Build exchange ecosystems rather than isolated courses

Agencies must develop long-term programs with rotational assignments, mentoring

structures, and active alumni networks rather than relying on single training courses. This

ensures that interpersonal relationships and institutional knowledge outlast individual

postings. Police leaders should track graduates of international programmes, offer

refresher placements, and structure rotations so that a core of experienced contacts

remains accessible. Such ecosystem design directly implements the trust engines

identified in this study and aligns with Europol's recognition of liaison officers and

experts as essential cooperation resources (Europol, 2024b).

6.3.2 Curate summits for operational launch

Organizers of international meetings must deliberately create side sessions and informal

working group slots with operational purposes. Host agencies can transform summit

convening power into ongoing cooperation by forming small task teams with specific

objectives during the event, documenting agreements reached, and tracking follow-

through. This means moving beyond purely ceremonial agendas toward tangible action

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

103

items. Effective side meetings and corridor discussions can accelerate casework,

transforming summit diplomacy into operational reality.

6.3.3 Standardize lawful early sharing

Agencies should develop clear, rights-based mechanisms for preliminary data exchange

before cases proceed through formal channels. This might include short information-

sharing templates or provisional cooperation requests that enable partners to share

sensitive leads promptly. This recommendation builds on recent INTERPOL legal

developments; the 2023 revisions to the Rules on Processing of Data emphasize both

timely information exchange and robust data protection (INTERPOL, 2023). By

providing standardized, pre-agreed exchange formats, agencies enable partners to make

time-limited commitments without incurring unnecessary legal risk.

6.3.4 Supply reliable technical support

Technical services function as a currency of cooperation, and their consistent quality and

availability build reputational capital. When an agency regularly delivers useful analytical

results, a habit of reciprocity develops among partner agencies. Leaders should therefore

ensure that cooperation platforms provide strong technical support, publicize available

services, and co-brand successful outcomes. Over time, these technical achievements

generate goodwill: an agency known for providing actionable intelligence creates a

reputation that motivates others to contribute in return.

6.3.5 Use public communication to reinforce trust and legitimacy

Soft power can be enhanced through strategic communication of cooperative successes.

When joint police operations or training achievements are publicized, partner agencies

benefit from recognition and enhanced reputation. This positive messaging serves a dual

purpose: it reassures domestic publics of law enforcement legitimacy while signalling to

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

104

potential partners that joint efforts will result in acknowledged outcomes. Transparent

communication of shared successes enhances the attractiveness and credibility of

collaborative ventures without undermining the behind-the-scenes trust that enables them.

6.3.6 Develop comprehensive Dubai and Gulf partnership architecture

Agencies in the Gulf, particularly Dubai Police, should integrate multiple soft power tools

into a coherent strategy that transforms international interest into tangible joint

operations. Drawing on the UAE's strengths in event diplomacy and innovation

leadership, the following specific measures are recommended:

• Institutionalize multi-month secondments and alumni activation with annual reunions

tied to live casework, ensuring that relationships formed during training translate into

operational collaboration.

• Publish plain-language early lawful sharing templates with explicit retention and audit

clauses that partners can readily adopt, reducing legal uncertainty in preliminary

exchanges.

• Pair every major summit with pre-scheduled side sessions, named action owners, and

a 90-day action docket to ensure that corridor conversations produce tangible follow-

through.

• Offer open training modules and co-authored playbooks alongside technology

demonstrations, avoiding the creation of dependence while building genuine

partnership capacity.

• Maintain a standing liaison program that rotates through priority partner agencies and

reports quarterly on corridor outcomes and emerging cooperation opportunities.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

105

• Co-brand public communication with partner agencies, including explicit notes on

safeguards employed, to reinforce legitimacy and ensure credit is shared equitably.

These measures respond directly to participant evidence that Dubai's convening power

and innovation leadership attract partners, but that sustainable cooperation requires

embedding these assets in consistent, operationally anchored relationships rather than

standalone showcase events.

6.3.7 Embed ethical governance in all cooperation mechanisms

Across all the measures above, agencies must ensure that rights-respecting governance

forms the foundation of cooperation. This means integrating data protection, auditability,

and oversight into exchange programmes, summit planning, early sharing templates,

technical platforms, and public communication. The evidence demonstrates that such

safeguards are not obstacles to cooperation but essential enablers that increase partners'

willingness to share and collaborate. Leaders should therefore treat ethical governance as

a strategic asset that enhances both legitimacy and operational effectiveness.

6.4 Limitations of the Study These conclusions should be understood within the context of several limitations. The

research employs a relatively small sample of expert participants, focuses empirically on

selected institutions in Europe, Dubai, and the Gulf, and relies partly on publicly available

documents and participant reports due to limited access to operational case files. The

following subsections elaborate these empirical and theoretical limitations and indicate

how future studies can address them.

6.4.1 Empirical Limitations

a. Access to primary data

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

106

Many operational communications and case files remain classified or restricted. This

analysis therefore relies on interview testimony and publicly available documents,

meaning some claims cannot be independently verified. This limitation directly points to

the need for methodological innovation in future research. New investigations should

develop creative data collection approaches, such as structured access agreements with

police agencies or systematic analysis of open-source incident data. Where primary

secrecy cannot be avoided, researchers can enhance triangulation by engaging a wider

pool of interviewees to cross-validate official accounts.

b. Dynamic nature of policing strategies

International security and policing mechanisms evolve continuously. Specific findings

may therefore become less applicable as policies change. Longitudinal studies are needed

to address this limitation. Replicating this study after several years would allow tracking

of how new laws, technologies, or platforms affect cooperation patterns. For example,

revisiting these questions after major policy developments—such as new mutual legal

assistance treaties or significant technology deployments—could reveal how soft power

networks evolve in response to institutional change.

c. Comparative analysis challenges

The agencies studied operate within diverse legal systems and institutional cultures. This

variety complicates direct comparison, though the study addressed this by focusing on

generalized mechanisms rather than one-size-fits-all conclusions. Future comparative

analysis could extend this approach by systematically examining police cooperation in

other regions, testing which aspects of soft power are universal and which are context-

specific. Such regional comparisons could hold legal traditions or institutional maturity

constant while examining variation in cooperation outcomes.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

107

d. Qualitative scope

The case-based interview method excels at explaining mechanisms and tracing processes

but cannot generate statistical generalizations. This study describes how cooperation

works but does not measure how much cooperation occurs. Future research should

therefore incorporate quantitative measures. Mixed-method studies could map inter-

agency networks and track indicators such as response times, number of joint operations,

or volume of shared data. Social network analysis offers one promising quantitative tool

for plotting these relationships and identifying influential nodes. By combining

qualitative insights with such metrics, researchers could subject the proposed soft power

model to more rigorous testing.

6.4.2 Theoretical Limitations

e. Emerging role of digital diplomacy

This study concentrated on traditional cooperation channels, yet social media and online

communication are increasingly prominent in law enforcement engagement. Future

research must examine digital public diplomacy in policing—for example, how police

use of Twitter, LinkedIn, or other platforms shapes peer perceptions and willingness to

cooperate. Such investigation could reveal whether strategic online branding or

transparency campaigns function as extensions of soft power, and under what conditions.

f. Scope conditions for attraction

The mechanisms evidenced here operate most clearly where partners already share

baseline legal compatibility and reputational expectations. In settings with very low

institutional trust or severe legal mismatch, attraction may not translate into early sharing

without prior legalization or third-party guarantees (Legrand & Leuprecht, 2021). Future

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

108

research should systematically investigate these threshold conditions, identifying

minimum requirements for exchange duration, legal compatibility, and institutional trust

below which soft power strategies may require supplementary guarantees.

g. Construct precision and measurement

While this study specifies procedural reliability, rights-anchored governance, and

capability signalling as sources of attraction, the field still lacks shared indicators to

compare these across regions. Future work should formalize construct boundaries and

develop common measures to test external validity at scale (Gallarotti, 2022; Europol,

2024a). This would enable more systematic comparison of soft power effectiveness

across different institutional and cultural contexts.

6.5 Future Work The following research directions respond directly to the empirical and theoretical

limitations identified above and operationalize the study's contribution for cumulative

testing.

a) Measurement of cooperation performance

Mixed methods designs can pair qualitative network maps with quantitative indicators

such as response times, volume of early lawful exchanges, and rates of joint operations

before and after major exchanges or summits. Such designs would enable more precise

attribution of cooperative outcomes to specific soft power interventions.

b) Comparative regional analysis

Studies can examine whether the same soft power mechanisms hold across regions with

different legal cultures and levels of institutionalization, including closer examination of

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

109

Gulf and African partnerships. This would test the generalizability of findings beyond the

European and Gulf contexts.

c) Digital diplomacy of policing

Research can analyze institutional social media and public communication as intentional

tools that shape professional perceptions and willingness to cooperate, rather than as

public relations alone. This includes examining how online transparency, professional

networking, and virtual communities of practice influence reputational capital across

jurisdictions.

d) Program design evaluation

Longitudinal evaluations can test which exchange ecosystem features most strongly

predict durable trust—for example, mentoring density, alumni activation frequency, or

optimal length of secondments. Such evidence would enable evidence-based design of

cooperation programmes.

e) New technological and online soft power dynamics

Future research needs to examine how artificial intelligence-facilitated analytics,

automated risk scoring, and shared cyber policing platforms affect perceptions of

reliability, bias, and fairness among partner agencies. Researchers should investigate how

algorithmic transparency, explainability, and jointly governed data standards influence

trust in intelligence sharing systems, and how different data collaboration models may

strengthen or undermine soft power effectiveness. Simultaneously, the study of digital

soft power in policing should evaluate how institutional adoption of professional social

media, secure virtual liaison networks, and open training libraries shapes reputational

capital and cooperation behaviour across jurisdictions.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

110

f) Threshold conditions for soft power effectiveness

Future research should systematically investigate the minimum conditions under which

attraction-based mechanisms reliably translate into cooperation. This includes identifying

thresholds for exchange duration, legal compatibility, and institutional trust below which

soft power strategies may require supplementary guarantees or third-party mediation.

6.6 Alignment with the Initial Research Plan The study follows the planned phases and delivers the expected outcomes.

a. Phase one: The literature review and theoretical framework established soft power,

public diplomacy, and smart power as the analytic lens (Nye, 2004; Melissen, 2005;

Wilson, 2008).

b. Phase two: Primary and secondary data collection included semi-structured

interviews with 15 experts and institutional documents from INTERPOL and

Europol.

c. Phase three: Thematic analysis coded the corpus and generated a results chapter

structured directly around the research questions.

d. Phase four: The writing phase combined findings with theory and developed

actionable implications for policy and practice.

e. Phase five: Revision brought unity, coherence, and consistency to the final document.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

111

References Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A

framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5

Al Hanaee, M., & Davies, A. (2022). Influencing police and community relations in

Abu Dhabi with a soft power approach during COVID-19. Policing: A Journal

of Policy and Practice, 16(2), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paac023

Atkinson, C. (2010). Does soft power matter? A comparative analysis of student

exchange programs 1980–2006. Foreign Policy Analysis, 6(1), 1–22.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00099.x

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and

implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544–559.

https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Bettine, M., & Ozdemir, M. (2022). The Rio Olympic Games in the New York Times

pages: an analysis of Brazilian soft power. Sociology International Journal, 6,

234–238. https://doi.org/10.15406/sij.2022.06.00292

Brannagan, P. M., & Giulianotti, R. (2023). Unlocking the whole of soft power: A

quantum international relations analysis. Journal of Political Power, 16(3), 301–

321. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2023.2270412

Bullock, K., Hadfield, A., Keningale, P., Mallett, E., Tong, S., & Wellings, F. (2025).

United Kingdom-European Union policing and law enforcement cooperation in

the post-Brexit era. Policing and Society, 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2024.2442714

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5

https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paac023

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00099.x

https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

https://doi.org/10.15406/sij.2022.06.00292

https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2023.2270412

https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2024.2442714

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

112

Chaziza, M., & Lutmar, C. (2025). Saudi Arabia’s Niche Diplomacy: A Middle Power’s

Strategy for Global Influence. World, 6(2), 65.

https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020065

Europol. (2024a). Europol Programming Document 2024 – 2026.

https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/Europol_Progr

amming_Document_2024-2026.pdf

Europol. (2024b). Cybercrime Training Competency Framework.

https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/Europol%20C

ybercrime%20Training%20Competency%20Framework%202024.pdf

Fernandes, R. N. A. (2024). The New Thinking of Police Diplomacy in the Context of

International Coopetition. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/57802

Frasca, E. (2023). Informal agreements and quasi-legal mechanisms in EU-Africa

cooperation on migration: how the EU takes advantage of the GCM

commitments. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 5, 1207628.8.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2023.1207628

Gallarotti, G. M. (2022). Esteem and influence: soft power in international

politics. Journal of Political Power, 15(3), 383–396.

https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2022.2135303

Greener, B. K. (2011). The diplomacy of international policing: A case study of the

New Zealand experience. Political Science, 63(2), 219–239.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0032318711424685

Greitens, S. C., Kardon, I. B., & Waltz, C. (2025). A New World Cop on the Beat?

China’s Internal Security Outreach Under the Global Security Initiative.

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020065

https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/Europol_Programming_Document_2024-2026.pdf

http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/57802

https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2023.1207628

https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2022.2135303

https://doi.org/10.1177/0032318711424685

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

113

https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/08/a-new-world-cop-on-the-beat-

chinas-internal-security-outreach-under-the-global-security-initiative

Guzansky, Y., & Zalayat, I (2024). The Race for Soft Power in the Gulf. In Research

Forum (p. 3).

Hays, D. G., & McKibben, W. B. (2021). Promoting rigorous research: Generalizability

and qualitative research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 99(2), 178–188.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12365

Howlader, M., & Sarkar, P. (2025). Ethnomathematical Insights: A Thematic Analysis

of Geometrical Concepts in the Daily Lives of Fishermen Community. Asian J.

Interdicip. Res, 8(3), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.54392/ajir2539

Hunter, A. (2009). Soft power: China on the global stage. Chinese Journal of

International Politics, 2(3), 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop001

INTERPOL. (2023). Annual report 2023: General Assembly Resolution on Rules on the

Processing of Data.

INTERPOL. (n.d.). Values and ethics. https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are/General-

Secretariat/Values-and-ethics

Lai, H., & Lu, Y. (Eds.). (2012). China's soft power and international relations (Vol.

23). London: Routledge.

Legrand, T., & Leuprecht, C. (2021). Securing cross-border collaboration:

transgovernmental enforcement networks, organized crime and illicit

international political economy. Policy and Society, 40(4), 565–586.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1975216

Link, J. (2022). The Expanding International Reach of China's Police. Center for

American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-expanding-

international-reach-of-chinas-police/

https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/08/a-new-world-cop-on-the-beat-chinas-internal-security-outreach-under-the-global-security-initiative

https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12365

https://doi.org/10.54392/ajir2539

https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop001

https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are/General-Secretariat/Values-and-ethics

https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1975216

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-expanding-international-reach-of-chinas-police/

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

114

Mazarr, M. J., Beauchamp-Mustafaga, N., Blank, J., Charap, S., Chase, M. S., Grill, B.,

... & Walker, D. (2022). Security Cooperation in a Strategic Competition.

American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 110-124.

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA600/RRA65

0-1/RAND_RRA650-1.pdf

Melissen, J. (2005). The new public diplomacy. Palgrave.

Mutz, D. C., & Simmons, B. A. (2022). The psychology of separation: Border walls,

soft power, and international neighborliness. Proceedings of the National

Academy of Sciences, 119(4), e2117797119.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117797119

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs.

Nye, J. S. (2021). Soft power: the evolution of a concept. In Essays on Evolutions In

The Study Of Political Power (pp. 196–208). Routledge.

Ramli, M. F., & Idris, H. (2022). Liberal Institutionalism Theory Approach in ASEAN's

Security Cooperation through Regionalism. Akademika, 92(1), 73-86.

https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2022-9201-06

Skinns, L., Rice, L., Sprawson, A., & Wooff, A. (2017). Police legitimacy in context:

exploring “soft” power in police custody in England. Policing: An International

Journal, 40(3), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2016-0077

Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2020). Expanding approaches for research: Understanding

and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of developmental

education, 44(1), 26–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45381095

Teichert, J. (2022). The Hard Power of Security Cooperation. War on the Rocks.

https://warontherocks.com/2022/03/the-hard-power-of-security-cooperation/

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA600/RRA650-1/RAND_RRA650-1.pdf

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117797119

https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2022-9201-06

https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2016-0077

https://www.jstor.org/stable/45381095

https://warontherocks.com/2022/03/the-hard-power-of-security-cooperation/

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

115

Tsourapas, G. (2018). Authoritarian emigration states: Soft power and cross-border

mobility in the Middle East. International Political Science Review, 39(3), 400–

416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118759902

Villela, P. (2021). Transnational policing field: the relations between the drug

enforcement administration and the brazilian federal police. Lua Nova: Revista

de Cultura e Política, (114), 105-136. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-105136/114

Villela, P. (2021). Transnational policing field: the relations between the Drug

Enforcement Administration and the brazilian federal police. Lua Nova: Revista

de Cultura e Política, (114), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-105136/114

Villela, P. (2021). Transnational policing field: the relations between the Drug

Enforcement Administration and the Brazilian federal police. Lua Nova: Revista

de Cultura e Política, (114), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-105136/114

Wilson III, E. J. (2008). Hard power, soft power, smart power. The Annals of the

Yew-woei, C. (2023). Jointly combating new forms of transnational crime through real-

time cooperation. iPolitics. https://www.ipolitics.ca/2023/11/05/jointly-

combating-new-forms-of-transnational-crime-through-real-time-cooperation/

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA:

Sage.

Zaiotti, R. (2023). Border crossings as soft power: international relations, digital

diplomacy and the'border control museum complex'. International Journal of

Migration and Border Studies, 7(3), 239-253.

https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2023.130764

https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118759902

https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-105136/114

https://www.ipolitics.ca/2023/11/05/jointly-combating-new-forms-of-transnational-crime-through-real-time-cooperation/

https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2023.130764

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

116

APPENDICES

6.7 Appendix A: Interview Questions 1. How do you define "soft power" in the context of international policing, and how do

you think it contributes to cooperation between police agencies?

2. Can you describe any officer exchange programs or training initiatives you have been

involved in? How do you think these programs influence trust and collaboration

between agencies?

3. What role do multilateral policing summits such as INTERPOL or Europol

conferences play in fostering long-term cooperation among law enforcement

agencies? Can you share any personal experiences from these events?

4. What are the most effective tools or strategies within soft power for improving

international policing cooperation?

5. Can you provide an example where informal agreements, such as memorandums of

understanding or informal partnerships, played a significant role in solving an

international crime or improving cooperation between countries?

6. What are the significant challenges or barriers you have encountered in implementing

soft power strategies in international policing efforts?

7. How do you perceive social media's or public-facing communication's role in shaping

international relationships between police organizations? Can you give an example?

8. How does your agency or organization engage in soft power initiatives? Are there

specific programs or collaborations that have been particularly successful or

impactful?

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

117

9. What role does trust play in successful international policing cooperation? How do

soft power strategies help build or reinforce this trust?

10. What recommendations would you give to improve global policing cooperation using

soft power initiatives in the future? Are there specific areas that need more focus or

development?

6.8 Appendix B: Conceptual Model

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

118

6.9 Appendix C: Participant Information Sheet and Consent Form

Title of the Study: Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through

Cooperation and Exchange

Principal Researcher: [Name]

Institution: [Department, University]

Contact Email: [Email address]

Supervisor: [Name], [Title], [Department, University]

1. Invitation

You are invited to take part in an academic study about how soft power practices influence

cooperation in cross-border policing. Before making a decision, please read the following

information carefully. You may ask any questions before you choose whether to

participate.

Participation is entirely voluntary.

2. Purpose of the Study

This study examines how police organizations and related agencies use tools such as

training programs, officer exchanges, liaison networks, international summits, and

communication practices to:

1. Build trust and legitimacy between partners

2. Enable earlier and safer information sharing

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

119

3. Strengthen long-term cooperation across borders

3. What Participation Involves

If you agree to participate:

1. You will take part in a semi-structured interview of approximately [45 to 75] minutes.

2. The interview may take place in person, online, or by phone, depending on your

preference.

3. You will be asked about your professional experience with international cooperation,

training, liaison work, information sharing, or related mechanisms.

4. With your permission, the interview will be audio-recorded to ensure accurate

analysis. If you prefer not to be recorded, detailed notes will be taken in your place.

5. You may decline to answer any question that you do not wish to address.

4. Voluntary Participation and Right to Withdraw

1. Your participation is voluntary.

2. You may refuse to participate without any negative consequence.

3. You may withdraw from the study at any time before data analysis by contacting the

researcher.

4. If you withdraw, your interview data will be removed and not used in the study, unless

it has already been irreversibly anonymized and integrated into aggregated analysis.

5. Potential Risks

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

120

1. There is a minimal risk that describing cooperation practices could be perceived

as sensitive.

2. To reduce this risk, the researcher will:

• Avoid asking for classified or operationally compromising information

• Anonymize all identifying details

• Present findings in aggregate form or with fully anonymized quotations

6. Potential Benefits

1. You may contribute to a clearer understanding of how professional trust, governance,

and innovation improve international policing cooperation.

2. The findings may inform future policy and institutional design in ways that support

more effective, lawful, and trusted collaboration.

3. There is no financial compensation unless your organization has agreed otherwise.

7. Confidentiality and Data Protection

1. Your name, direct identifiers, and specific post will not appear in any publication or

presentation without your explicit written permission.

2. In the thesis and related outputs, you will be referred to using a generic code such as

P1, P2, or similar role-based descriptors.

3. Audio files, transcripts, and notes will be stored securely on password-protected and

encrypted storage accessible only to the research team.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

121

4. Anonymized data may be retained for academic purposes in line with institutional

policy.

5. No information will be shared with your employer or any external agency in a way

that could identify you personally.

8. Ethical Approval

[If applicable, edit to match your situation.]

This study has received ethical clearance from the [Name of University] Research Ethics

Committee. All procedures follow the ethical guidelines of [University or relevant body].

If you have any ethical concerns, you may contact:

[Chair or Secretary, Research Ethics Committee, contact details]

9. Consent Statement

Please read each statement and indicate your agreement.

1. I have read and understood the information provided about this study.

2. I have had the opportunity to ask questions and have received satisfactory answers.

3. I understand that my participation is voluntary and that I may withdraw at any time

before analysis without penalty and without giving a reason.

4. I understand that the interview will focus on my professional experience and that I

should not disclose classified or operationally sensitive information.

5. I consent to the use of anonymized quotations from my interview in the thesis and

related academic publications or presentations.

“Soft Power in Cross-Border Policing: Building Security through Cooperation and Exchange” M.Sc. Thesis by Alyazia Alnaqbi - University of Sharjah

122

6. I understand that my identity will be protected through anonymization and secure data

handling.

7. I understand that the data collected will be used only for academic and research

purposes.

8. I agree to participate in this study.

9. I agree that the interview may be audio recorded for transcription and analysis.

I prefer that no audio recording be made, and I agree to note-taking only.

10. Participant and Researcher Signatures

Participant

Name: .............................................................

Position / Organization: .............................................................

Signature: .............................................................

Date: .............................................................

Researcher

Name: .............................................................

Signature: .............................................................

Date: .............................................................