Statistics Final report
Final Report Rubrics
200 points
Please submit a PDF file.
Two pages not including references, tables, and figures.
Rubrics:
|
Section 1: Introduction |
20 points |
|
Section 2: Hypothesis |
32 points - Description of a dependent variable and your independent variable(s): 16 points - Description of expected sign(s) and rationales behind your expectation: 16 points |
|
Section 2: Model |
68 points - Description of other variables you didn’t describe in Section 2: 28 points The minimum required number of variables is seven (i.e., 1 dependent variable + 3 independent variable + 3 control variables, 1 dependent variable + 6 independent variables + 0 control variables, etc. All are fine) - Description of expected signs and rationales behind your expectation: 40 points |
|
Section 3: Conclusion |
20 points - Discussion of practical values of your research |
|
Table (Summary of Variables) |
48 points |
|
Format |
12 points Submit in PDF The final report shouldn't exceed 2 pages 12-point font size, Times New Roman or equivalent, Double-spaced, 8.5x11 Letter size, 1-inch margin Insert Section headings (Introduction, Hypothesis, Model, Conclusion) |
MSGB General Grading Rubrics: Written Reports
|
|
90-100% |
80-89% |
70-79% |
69% and under |
|
Context of and Purpose for Writing Includes considerations of audience, purpose, and the circumstances surrounding the writing task(s). (1.000, 20%) |
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of context, audience, and purpose that is responsive to the assigned task(s) and focuses all elements of the work. |
Demonstrates adequate consideration of context, audience, and purpose and a clear focus on the assigned task(s) (e.g., the task aligns with audience, purpose, and context). |
Demonstrates awareness of context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., begins to show awareness of audience's perceptions and assumptions). |
Demonstrates minimal attention to context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., expectation of instructor or self as audience). |
|
Content Development (1.000, 20%) |
Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the writer's understanding, and shaping the whole work. |
Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to explore ideas within the context of the discipline and shape the whole work. |
Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop and explore ideas through most of the work. |
Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop simple ideas in some parts of the work. |
|
Genre and Disciplinary Conventions Formal and informal rules inherent in the expectations for writing in particular forms and/or academic fields (please see glossary). (1.000, 20%) |
Demonstrates detailed attention to and successful execution of a wide range of conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task (s) including organization, content, presentation, formatting, and stylistic choices |
Demonstrates consistent use of important conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s), including organization, content, presentation, and stylistic choices |
Follows expectations appropriate to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s) for basic organization, content, and presentation |
Attempts to use a consistent system for basic organization and presentation. |
|
Sources and Evidence (1.000, 20%) |
Demonstrates skillful use of high quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing |
Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing. |
Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing. |
Demonstrates an attempt to use sources to support ideas in the writing. |
|
Control of Syntax and Mechanics Uses graceful language that skillfully (1.000, 20%) |
Uses graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error free. |
Uses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to readers. The language in the portfolio has few errors. |
Uses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing may include some errors. |
Uses language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage. |