Project Control, Sustainability Policy and PowerPoint Presentation

3/4/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921359&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881958&groupId=0… 1/6

Criteria Excellent Good Developing Needs Improvem

Identification

and discussion

of any ethical

considerations

in purchasing

activities

5 points

Identification of possible

ethical considerations

were made.

The importance of

societal concerns in

business purchasing was

discussed in an

insightful and thorough

manner. Any possible

ethical conflict were

identified and if none

were found a strong

argument was made to

explain why that was

the case. All conclusions

drawn were reasoned

logically and

application of the class

material and case study

facts resulting in a

demonstration of an

excellent understanding

of the ethical

considerations for

purchasing materials.

( 4.5-5.0)

4.25 points

Identification of possible ethical

considerations was made.

The importance of societal concerns

in business purchasing was

discussed in an competent

manner. Most possible ethical

conflicts were identified and if none

were found an argument was made

to explain why that was the

case. Most conclusions drawn were

reasoned well with exception of one

of the products under discussion.

(4.0-4.49)

3.75 points

Identification of

possible ethical

considerations was

made. However the

discussion was too

general.

The importance of

societal concerns in

business purchasing

was satisfactory. Most

but one or

two possible ethical

conflicts were missed

or vaguely discussed.

A general discussion

as to why none were

found rather than a

strong argument was

made to explain why

that was the

case. Most

conclusions drawn

were reasoned well

with exception of one

of the products under

discussion. Use of

class material and

case study facts was

sufficient but added

to the feeling that

3.25 points

Identification and

discussion was

attempted but

reasoning with us

of class material a

case study facts w

sparse.

Conclusions were

underdeveloped

lack sound

reasoning suppor

by the class mate

and case study

facts.

(3.0-3.49)

3/4/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921359&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881958&groupId=0… 2/6

Identification

of Sustainable

Issues both

eco and

financial for

the items to

be purchased

Content of

only a general

understanding of the

ethical issues resulted.

(3.5-3.99)

5 points

Identification of

Sustainable Issues both

eco and financial for the

items to be purchased

were

complete. Conclusions

drawn in

discussion show

insightful understanding

of the possible issues

surrounding supply

purchasing both in terms

of money and planet. All

products were

addressed. Explanation

of the possible issues

surrounding the

products reflect a strong

level of analysis,

synthesis,

evaluation with

reasoning for

conclusions

supported by the case

material and case study

facts.

(4.5-5.0)

4.25 points

Identification of Sustainable Issues

both eco and financial for the items

to be purchased were

complete. Conclusions drawn in

discussion show a

good understanding of the possible

issues surrounding supply

purchasing both in terms of money

and planet. All products were

addressed but the explanation of

the possible issues surrounding the

products while strong, showed

areas of weak application of the

case material and case study facts.

(4.0-4.49)

3.75 points

Identification of

Sustainable Issues

both eco and financial

for the items to be

purchased were

complete. Conclusions

drawn in

discussion show

a general

understanding of

the possible issues

surrounding supply

purchasing both in

terms of money and

planet. All products

were addressed but

the explanation of the

possible issues

surrounding the

products was

overbroad thus

showing weakness in

the application of the

case material and case

study facts. More

detail needed.

(3.5-3.99)

3.25 points

An attempt was

made to discuss

sustainability issu

but the conclusio

drawn reflected

a weak level

of reasoning and

support from the

case material and

case study facts.

(3.0-3.49)

6 points 5.1 points 4.5 points 3.9 points

3/4/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921359&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881958&groupId=0… 3/6

slide

presentation

and summary

of

assignments

Slide

Presentation

and Flow

Demonstrates

exceptional

understanding of how

the assignments

form the purchasing

link of a supply chain.

Presentation addressed

completely every aspect

of the assignments both

minor and major.

Conclusions and link

description

discussion demonstrated

excellent application of

critical thinking skills as

well as strong support

from the class material

and cases study facts.

Research was evident

when appropriate.

(5.4-6.0)

Demonstrates a good understanding

of how the assignments form the

purchasing link of a supply chain.

Presentation addressed

completely the major points of the

assignments but one or two minor

points were missed. Conclusions

and link description

discussion demonstrated

competent application of critical

thinking skills as well as strong

support from the class material and

cases study facts. Research was

evident when appropriate.

(4.8-5.399)

Demonstrates

satisfactory

understanding of

discussion but it

was general in its

discussion of most of

the major assignment

aspects and

missed more than two

minor aspects of

assignment. Use of

the class material and

case study facts was

sufficient but not as

evident in the

explanation of the

connection purchasing

to supply chain.

(4.2-4.799)

Fails to show a fir

understanding of

requirements;

missed two key

elements or seve

minor aspects of

assignments in th

discussion. Use o

class material,

research if

appropriate and

case study facts w

minimal and not

evident in the lin

connection

discussion.

(3.60-4.199)

3 points

Presentation flows well

and logically; transitions

are smooth, interesting,

persuasive and enhance

presentation. The slides

are bulleted, contain

intext citation were

appropriate and notes

explain the slides while

supporting the

conclusions drawn.

Reference list was

2.55 points

Presentation flows well; smooth

transitions; use of persuasiveness

was underdeveloped in some areas;

slides were bulleted and contained

APA intext citations where

appropriate, notes mostly explained

the slides. Reference list was

included in a separate slide at the

end of the presentation.

(2.4-2.69)

2.25 points

Presentation mostly

flowed smooth

transitions used were

missing in one or two

slides; no use of

persuasive language;

slides were bulleted

but the intext

citations were missing

one or two times;

notes were generally

instructive of the

1.95 points

Presentation is

unorganized; ve

few transitions

and/or they distr

from presentatio

persuasiveness w

generally

undeveloped. Sli

contained all

discussion rathe

than the notes

Support for th

3/4/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921359&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881958&groupId=0… 4/6

Attention to

Instructions

Writing

Mechanics

included in a separate

slide at the end.

(2.7-3.0)

material presented.

Reference list

included in a separate

slide at the end.

(2.1 - 2.39)

information

presented was

minimal.

(1.8 - 2.09)

3 points

Demonstrates

exceptional

understanding of

requirements

responding completely

to each aspect of

assignment including

minor aspects of the

assignment such as

using third person

writing, required use of

course readings, and

assignment format.

(2.7-3.0)

2.5 points

Demonstrates excellent

understanding of requirements;

missed one minor aspect of

assignment.

(2.4-2.69)

2.3 points

Demonstrates

satisfactory

understanding of

requirements; missed

a key element or two

minor aspects of

assignment.

(2.1-2.39)

1.95 points

Fails to show a fir

understanding of

requirements;

missed two key

elements or seve

minor aspects of

assignment.

(1.8-2.09)

2 points

Strictly adheres to

standard usage rules of

written English,

including but not limited

to capitalization,

punctuation, run-on

sentences, missing or

extra words, stylistic

errors, spelling and

grammatical errors. No

errors found. No

1.7 points

Excellently adheres to standard

usage of mechanics: conventions of

written English, including

capitalization, punctuation, and

spelling. One to three errors found.

(1.6- 1.79)

1.5 points

Satisfactorily adheres

to standard usage

rules of mechanics:

conventions of

English, including

capitalization,

punctuation, and

spelling. Four to 10

errors found.

(1.4- 1.59)

1.3 points

Minimally adhere

to standard usage

rules of mechanic

conventions of

written English,

including

capitalization,

punctuation, and

spelling.

(1.2-1.39)

3/4/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921359&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881958&groupId=0… 5/6

Total / 26

Overall Score

APA Format

contractions or jargon

used.

(1.8- 2.0)

2 points

No APA style or usage

errors; Proper citation of

source material is used

throughout paper;

Reference titles follow

APA with only the first

word, the first word

after a colon and proper

nouns capitalized.

(1.8-2.0)

1.7 points

Attempts in-text citations and

reference list but one or two APA

style errors noted or fails to use

APA citations when appropriate 1-2

times.

(1.6-1.79)

1.5 points

Attempts in-text

citations and

reference lists; APA

style errors are noted

throughout document;

Fails to use APA

citations when

appropriate 3 times in

document.

(1.4 -1.59)

1.3 points

Attempts in-text

citations and

reference lists; Fa

to use APA citatio

when appropriate

5 times; or prese

only 1-2 in-text

citations and

reference list in a

paper that requir

APA citations

throughout the

document.

(1.2-1.39)

Excellent 23.4 points

minimum

Good 20.8 points

minimum

Developing 18.2 points

minimum

Needs

Improvement 15.6 points minimum

Failure 0 points minimum

3/4/2020 Rubric Assessment - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=487048&evalObjectId=921359&evalObjectType=1&userId=173587&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=881958&groupId=0… 6/6

Close