History
Hassssan
FinalProjectGradingRubrics1.docxPart 1| Final Project Grading Rubric #2A: Submission Phase (Workshop)
(Total Points for Submission + Assessment=50)
Criterion |
Exceptional |
Good |
Fair/Adequate |
Limited |
Poor/Unacceptable |
|
Attention to instructions and assignment |
9-10 points: Follows and exceeds expectations noted in instructions |
8 points: Follows instructions |
7 points: Follows some but not all instructions |
6 points: Gestures towards instructions but demonstrates little comprehension or competency |
0-5 points: Disregards instructions |
|
Creative Thought/ Problem-Solving
|
9-10 points: Demonstrates a high degree of originality, insight, and/or problem-solving skill |
8 points: Shows some originality, insight, and/or problem-solving skill |
7 points: Shows minimally acceptable originality, insight, and/or problem-solving skill |
6 points: Demonstrates very little creative thought or insight; consists mostly of second-hand ideas |
0-5 points: Shows no original thought; all second-hand ideas |
|
Thesis Statement |
9-10 points: Thesis statement is specific, significant, arguable, and easy to find |
8 points Thesis statement arguable and easy to find |
7 points: Thesis statement minimally acceptable but somewhat general or obvious |
6 points: Thesis statement simplistic or incomprehensible |
0-5 points: No thesis statement. |
|
Development and Support |
5 points: Thoroughly and insightfully explores, explains, and supports each idea |
4 points Develops and supports key points |
3 points: Inconsistently develops and supports ideas |
2 points: Inadequately or ineffectively explains and defends ideas |
0-1 points: Does not make a meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas |
|
Clarity |
5 points: Difficult material is made clear and presented in academic language |
4 points Most ideas are presented clearly, but sometimes too simplistically |
3 points: Wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully |
2 points: Unclear and difficult to understand |
0-1 points: Largely incomprehensible |
|
Structure/ Organization
|
5 points: Well organized from introduction to conclusion; paragraphs and ideas flow coherently |
4 points: Easy to follow, but would benefit from some restructuring and/or stronger transitions between ideas |
3 points: Readable, but order of ideas and/or transitions between ideas need work |
2 points: Paper is difficult to follow |
0-1 points: Ideas are presented randomly with no clear logic governing their order or transitions between them |
|
Formal/ professional language
|
5 points: Highly articulate academic tone |
4 points: Clear and appropriate language |
3 points: Acceptable language use overall, but some informal language |
2 points: Some acceptable language use, but overall tone is informal |
0-1 points: Lack of respect shown to subject through use of slang and/or overly casual or colloquial language |
|
Max Total Points |
40 |
No data |
No data |
No data |
|
Part 1| Final Project Grading Rubric #2B: Assessment Phase (Workshop)
Criterion |
Exceptional |
Good |
Fair/Adequate |
Limited |
Poor/Unacceptable |
|
Creative Thought/ Problem-Solving
|
9-10 points: Demonstrates a high degree of originality, insight, and/or problem-solving skill |
8 points: Shows some originality, insight, and/or problem-solving skill |
7 points: Shows minimally acceptable originality, insight, and/or problem-solving skill |
6 points: Demonstrates very little creative thought or insight; consists mostly of second-hand ideas |
0-5 points: Shows no original thought; all second-hand ideas |
|
Max Total Points |
10 |
Part II | Final Project Grading Rubric #3A: Course Content
(Total Points for Content + Writing Skills=355)
Criterion |
Exceptional |
Good |
Fair/Adequate |
Limited |
Poor/Unacceptable |
|
Attention to instructions and assignment [45 points] |
40.5-45 points Follows and exceeds expectations noted in instructions |
36-40.05 points Follows instructions |
31.5-35.55 points Follows some but not all instructions |
27-31.05 points Gestures towards instructions but demonstrates little comprehension or competency |
0-26.55 points Disregards instructions |
|
Creative Thought/ Problem-Solving [45 points]
|
40.5-45 points Demonstrates a high degree of originality, insight, and/or problem-solving skill |
36-40.05 points Shows some originality, insight, and/or problem-solving skill |
31.5-35.55 points Shows minimally acceptable originality, insight, and/or problem-solving skill |
27-31.05 points Demonstrates very little creative thought or insight; consists mostly of second-hand ideas |
0-26.55 points Shows no original thought; all second-hand ideas |
|
Thesis Statement [65 points]
|
58.5-65 points Thesis statement is specific, significant, arguable, and easy to find |
52-57.85 points Thesis statement arguable and easy to find |
45.5-51.35 points Thesis statement minimally acceptable but somewhat general or obvious |
39-44.85 points Thesis statement simplistic or incomprehensible |
0-38.45 points No thesis statement. |
|
Development and Support [70 points]
|
63-70 points Thoroughly and insightfully explores, explains, and supports each idea |
56-62.30 points Develops and supports key points |
49-55.30 points Inconsistently develops and supports ideas |
42-48.30 points Inadequately or ineffectively explains and defends ideas |
0-41.30 points Does not make a meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas |
|
Clarity [25 points]
|
22.5-25 points Difficult material is made clear and presented in academic language |
20-22.25 points Most ideas are presented clearly, but sometimes too simplistically |
17.5-19.75 points Wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully |
15-17.25 points Unclear and difficult to understand |
0-14.75 points Largely incomprehensible |
|
Max Total Points |
250 |
No data |
No data |
No data |
|
WEEK 7) Part II| Final Project Grading Rubric #3b: Writing Skills
Criterion |
Exceptional |
Good |
Fair/Adequate |
Limited |
Poor/Unacceptable |
|
Structure/ Organization [45 points]
|
40.5-45 points Well organized from introduction to conclusion; paragraphs and ideas flow coherently |
36-40.05 points Easy to follow, but would benefit from some restructuring and/or stronger transitions between ideas |
31.5-35.55 points Readable, but order of ideas and/or transitions between ideas need work |
27-31.05 points Paper is difficult to follow |
0-26.55 points Ideas are presented randomly with no clear logic governing their order or transitions between them |
|
Formal/ professional Language [20 points]
|
18-20 points Highly articulate academic tone |
16-17.8 points Clear and appropriate language |
14-15.8 points Acceptable language use overall, but some informal language |
12-13.8 points Some acceptable language use, but overall tone is informal |
0-11.8 points Lack of respect shown to subject through use of slang and/or overly casual or colloquial language |
|
Grammar (sentence structure, subject/verb agreement, pronoun/antecedent agreement, etc.) [25 points]
|
22.5-25 points No grammatical errors |
20-22.25 points Occasional errors in grammar (one or two per page) |
17.5-19.75 points Several minor errors per page |
15-17.25 points Grammatical errors make it necessary to reread sentences and/or sections to discern meaning |
0-14.75 points Coherence of overall meaning unclear due to grammar |
|
Punctuation, capitalization, & spelling/word choice [15 points]
|
13.5-15 points Punctuation, capitalization, and spelling are all correct. |
12-13.35 points No more than one error of this type per page |
10.5-11.85 points Approx. two or three errors of this type per page |
9-10.35 points Approx. four or five errors of this type per page |
0-8.85 points Paper requires extensive editing/proofreading in this area |
|
Max Total Points |
105 |
No data |
No data |
No data |
|
