Grading Rubric file
avvhatgihasad
FinalProjectGradingRubric1.pdf
PUP 301: Final Project Grading Rubric—Realism and Fantasy in SimCity
S C
R E
E N
S H
O T
S
10 Points Provides the required screenshot for City 1 that clearly includes student’s name in the city name.
0 Points Does not provide the required screenshot, or does not include the student’s name in the city name.
S C
R E
E N
S H
O T
S
20 Points Provides the three required screenshots for City 2 that clearly includes student’s name in the city name.
14 Points Provides only two of the three required screenshots.
7 Points Provides only one of the three required screenshots.
0 Points Does not provide the required screenshots, or does not include the student’s name in the city name.
S C
R E
E N
S H
O T
S
20 Points Provides the five required screenshots for City 3 that clearly includes student’s name in the city name.
16 Points Provides only four of the five required screenshots.
12 Points Provides only three of the five required screenshots.
8 Points Provides only one or two of the five required screenshots.
0 Points Does not provide the required screenshots, or does not include the student’s name in the city name.
F IN
A L R
E P
O R
T (P
A R
T 1
)
40 Points Provides a well-written discussion of 1) the original plans for each city, 2) ways the plans were (were not) achieved, and 3) difficulties encountered and how these were overcome.
32 Points Provides a discussion of the plans, successes, and difficulties, but with some room for elaboration and/or fails to discuss one of the three.
24 Points Somewhat provides a discussion of the plans, successes, and difficulties, but with definite room for elaboration, and/or fails to discuss two of the three.
16 Points Barely provides a brief discussion of the plans, successes, and difficulties, with extensive room for elaboration.
0 Points Does not adequately provide a discussion of the plans, successes, and difficulties.
F IN
A L R
E P
O R
T (P
A R
T 2
)
90 Points Provides a well-written critical analysis of how well the game replicates the challenges of planning a city in real life, including 1) how urban issues happen in reality, 2) how well the game simulates these issues, 3) the responses available (lacking) for decision-makers, and 4) the simulated implications of these responses.
72 Points Provides an analysis of how well the game replicates real life planning challenges, but with some room for elaboration and/or fails to discuss one of the four questions posed.
54 Points Somewhat provides an analysis of how well the game replicates real life, but with definite room for elaboration, and/or fails to discuss two of the four questions posed.
36 Points Barely provides a brief analysis of how well the game replicates real life, and/or only discusses one of the four questions posed. Extensive room for elaboration.
0 Points Does not adequately provide an analysis of how well the game replicates real life.
E D
IT IN
G
20 Points No editing errors whatsoever.
16 Points Minimal proofing & editing and/or content revision needed.
12 Points Some proofing & editing and/or content revision needed.
8 Points Substantial proofing & editing and/or content revision needed.
0 Points Proofing and editing errors distracting and in need of significant correction.
