BMIS 664 - Final Project

Criteria Ratings Points

Introduction and Conclusion

20 to >17.0 pts

Advanced

The introduction is succinct and embodies the project’s primary objectives and outcomes. The introduction constructs the purpose of the system. A compelling and justifiable conclusion is developed that supports the key outcomes. More than 5 scholarly sources and 500 words combined / 250 each.

17 to >16.0 pts

Proficient

The introduction and conclusion are succinct and embody most of the project’s primary objectives and outcomes, and/or the introduction constructs an unclear purpose of the system. Justified conclusion developed. Minimum of 5 scholarly sources and 500 words combined / 250 each.

16 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The introduction and/or conclusion are generalized and embody some of the project’s primary objectives and outcomes and/or have less than the minimum of 5 scholarly sources and 500 words combined and/or are not defensible.

0 pts

Not Present

Substantially unmet or not present

20 pts

Assessment of the security scenario including a review of related literature, forensic investigation, and strategy.

50 to >45.0 pts

Advanced

Review of literature shows mastery of cyber security research specific to electronic fund transfers. Each component of the forensics investigation is thoroughly addressed and supported by scholarly literature including the key stakeholders, hardware, and software involved in the fraudulent fund transfers. Over 2,500 relevant words exist and over 10 unique and relevant scholarly journal articles exist that justify the forensic investigative approaches and strategies.

45 to >41.0 pts

Proficient

Review of literature shows comprehension of cyber security research specific to electronic fund transfers and/or less than 90% of each requirement of the forensics investigation is thoroughly addressed and supported by scholarly literature including the key stakeholders, hardware, and software involved in the fraudulent fund transfers and/or 2,500 relevant words exist and/or 10 unique and relevant scholarly journal articles exist that justify the forensic investigative approaches and strategies.

41 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Review of literature shows some comprehension of cyber security research specific to electronic fund transfers and/or less than 70% of each requirement of the forensics investigation is thoroughly addressed and supported by scholarly literature including the key stakeholders, hardware, and software involved in the fraudulent fund transfers and/or less than 2,500 relevant words exist and/or less than 10 unique and relevant scholarly journal articles exist that justify the forensic investigative approaches and strategies.

0 pts

Not Present

Substantially unmet or not present

50 pts

Final Project Grading Rubric | BMIS664_D01_202140

Criteria Ratings Points

Mitigation Plan

56 to >51.0 pts

Advanced

Mitigation plan is more detailed and higher quality than the textbook examples in each of the core objectives including at a minimum the proposed personnel structure/team, mechanisms of defense, budget, schedule, risk management, procurement management, secure systems analysis, and design to prevent this incident from occurring in the future. Over two (2) new comprehensive network architecture diagrams exist with proper screenshots and over 20 pieces of hardware that mitigate future occurrences of both internal and external fraudulent electronic fund transfers. Plan is over 2,000 words with over 10 relevant supporting scholarly sources justifying the methods, standards, estimations, and costs.

51 to >46.0 pts

Proficient

Mitigation plan is a minimum of 70% complete, as detailed and of parallel quality as the textbook examples in each of the core objectives including at a minimum the proposed personnel structure/team, mechanisms of defense, budget, schedule, risk management, procurement management, secure systems analysis, and design to prevent this incident from occurring in the future. Minimum of two (2) new comprehensive network architecture diagrams exist with proper screenshots and 20 pieces of hardware that mostly mitigate future occurrences of both internal and external fraudulent electronic fund transfers. Plan is 2,000 words with a minimum of 10 relevant supporting scholarly sources justifying the methods, standards, estimations, and costs.

46 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Mitigation plan is less than 70% complete and/or not as detailed and of parallel quality as the textbook examples in each of the core objectives including at a minimum the proposed personnel structure/team, mechanisms of defense, budget, schedule, risk management, procurement management, secure systems analysis, and design to prevent this incident from occurring in the future and/or less than two (2) new comprehensive network architecture diagrams exist with proper screenshots and/or the diagrams have less than 20 pieces of hardware that mostly mitigate future occurrences of both internal and external fraudulent electronic fund transfers and/or plan is less than 2,000 words and/or has less than 10 relevant supporting scholarly sources justifying the methods, standards, estimations, and costs.

0 pts

Not Present

Screenshots of the network architecture diagrams are not present with proper operating system dates and times and/or substantially unmet or not present.

56 pts

Final Project Grading Rubric | BMIS664_D01_202140

Criteria Ratings Points

APA, Grammar, and Spelling

20 to >17.0 pts

Advanced

Properly formatted APA paper with table of contents and references pages. Correct spelling and grammar used. Contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format. Excellent organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist.

17 to >16.0 pts

Proficient

Paper contains fewer than 5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or some errors (3-7) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or inadequate organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist and/or notable absences in required APA formatting elements such as: Title page, running head, font type and size (Times New Roman 12 point), and line spacing.

16 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Paper contains fewer than 10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or numerous errors (7+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or inadequate organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist and/or notable absences in required APA formatting elements such as: Title page, running head, font type and size (Times New Roman 12 point), and line spacing.

0 pts

Not Present

Paper contains more than 10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or numerous errors (10+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or inadequate organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist.

20 pts

Final Project Grading Rubric | BMIS664_D01_202140

Criteria Ratings Points

Overall Requirements

34 to >30.0 pts

Advanced

Over 5,000 words exist of original student authorship that shows excellent mastery and knowledge of cyber and information security attacks and wire fraud. Over 20 unique scholarly peer reviewed journal articles from well-respected IT journals exist that directly relate to and sufficiently support cyber security and forensics. Proper screenshots with an OS date/time are present.

30 to >28.0 pts

Proficient

Minimum of 5,000 words exist of original student authorship that shows understanding and knowledge of cyber and information security attacks and wire fraud and/or at least 20 unique scholarly peer reviewed journal articles from well-respected IT journals exist that relate to and mostly support cyber security and forensics. Proper screenshots with an OS date/time are present.

28 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Less than 5,000 words exist of original student authorship that shows comprehension and knowledge of cyber and information security attacks and wire fraud and/or less than 20 unique scholarly peer reviewed journal articles from well-respected IT journals exist that relate to and mostly support cyber security and forensics. Proper screenshots with an OS date/time are present.

0 pts

Not Present

Proper screenshots with an OS date/time are not present and/or project requirements are substantially unmet or not present.

34 pts

Total Points: 180

Final Project Grading Rubric | BMIS664_D01_202140