Final Paper
Final Project Draft 5.24.2020.docx
by Rolandra Calloway
Submission date: 24-May-2020 07:11PM (UTC-0400) Submission ID: 1331162652 File name: Final_Project_Draft_5.24.2020.docx (30.35K) Word count: 2703 Character count: 16289
Awk.
1
2
3Awk.
4
5
6
7
Cap. Error
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
26% SIMILARITY INDEX
11% INTERNET SOURCES
5% PUBLICATIONS
23% STUDENT PAPERS
1 13%
2 2% 3 1%
4 1% 5 1% 6 1%
7 1%
Final Project Draft 5.24.2020.docx ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Southern New Hampshire University - Continuing Education Student Paper
Submitted to Trident University International Student Paper
Bruno S.M.C. Borba, Marcio Z. Fortes, Leonardo A. Bitencourt, Vitor H. Ferreira et al. "A review on optimization methods for workforce planning in electrical distribution utilities", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019 Publication
kkgpublications.com Internet Source
online.regiscollege.edu Internet Source
Submitted to Colorado State University, Global Campus Student Paper
benefitsforward.com Internet Source
8 1% 9 1%
10 1%
11 1% 12 1% 13 <1%
14 <1% 15 <1%
16 <1%
Submitted to Westcliff University Student Paper
Submitted to Walden University Student Paper
S. Ahid, E.L. Baji K. "PDG70 KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND PRACTICES OF MOROCCAN COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS TOWARDS THE THIRD-PARTY PAYER SYSTEM", Value in Health, 2019 Publication
Submitted to Campbellsville University Student Paper
www.policymed.com Internet Source
Submitted to SUNY College of Technology at Delhi Student Paper
Submitted to Siena Heights University Student Paper
Dennis Emmett. "Supply Chains in Healthcare Organizations: Lessons Learned from Recent Shortages", Hospital Topics, 2019 Publication
uekj.nuph.edu.ua Internet Source
17 <1% 18 <1% 19 <1% 20 <1% 21 <1% 22 <1% 23 <1%
Exclude quotes On
Exclude bibliography Off
Exclude matches Off
Submitted to Wolford College Student Paper
www.3mhisinsideangle.com Internet Source
www.sheffield.ac.uk Internet Source
www.nro.nl Internet Source
medpac.gov Internet Source
Submitted to Florida International University Student Paper
Submitted to Keller Graduate School of Management Student Paper
QM
QM
FINAL GRADE
/80
Final Project Draft 5.24.2020.docx GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
Awk. Awkward: The expression or construction is cumbersome or difficult to read. Consider rewriting.
Comment 1
This last statement is what I want to see in this section of the paper. Why does the healthcare organization want this? What happens if the healthcare organization does not meet BCBS' requirements? As a large payer, what influence does BCBS have on the healthcare organization?
Comment 2
has
PAGE 9
Comment 3
Remember, the focus is on the healthcare organization and the opportunity and challenges to the healthcare organization, not the payer.
Awk.
QM
Awkward: The expression or construction is cumbersome or difficult to read. Consider rewriting.
Comment 4
How is this an opportunity for the healthcare organization?
Comment 5
What does this mean for the healthcare organization?
Comment 6
This is a start! Why is this a challenge for the healthcare organization?
Comment 7
Everything stems from the healthcare organization, not the payer. So the healthcare organization (the hospital, for example) would be focused on revenue reimbursement.
Cap. Error Capitalization Additional Comment
This word is not a proper noun and should not be capitalized.
Comment 8
Blue Cross doesn't care about this, but the healthcare organization does.
Comment 9
Think about a hospital. How would a hospital use revenue reimbursement and benchmarking to ensure compliance with BCBS?
Comment 10
The third party is the insurer. The second party is the healthcare organization, which should be your focus in this paper.
PAGE 10
Comment 11
Think of a hospital. What policies/procedures could a hospital put into play to maximize reimbursement from BCBS?
Comment 12
P4P incentives are based partially off of patient satisfaction scores. Good ideas here.
Comment 13
I need to see more here. How does this tie to maximizing reimbursement in healthcare? For these, I'd like to see benchmarks that are more specific to healthcare. If you can tie these two recommendations to healthcare, that's awesome. If not, please choose two others.
PAGE 11
Comment 14
Yes!
Comment 15
Please indent the first line of all new paragraphs.
PAGE 12
Comment 16
Great recommendations! The more modes of communication that you have, the more likely you are to reach more people.
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
RUBRIC: ARTICLE REVIEW GRADING RUBRIC
CRITERION 1 (16%)
SCALE 1 (25)
SCALE 2 (50)
SCALE 3 (75)
SCALE 4 (100)
CRITERION 2 (16%)
SCALE 1 (25)
SCALE 2 (50)
SCALE 3 (75)
SCALE 4 (100)
CRITERION 3 (16%)
SCALE 1 (25)
SCALE 2 (50)
SCALE 3 (75)
SCALE 4 (100)
CRITERION 4 (16%)
0 / 100.002
0 / 100
Summarizes the context and content of the selected article
Understands with limited effectiveness • Identifies the main points of the articles with a limited degree of effectiveness
• Understands with some effectiveness • Identifies the main points of the articles with some degree of effectiveness
Understands with adequate effectiveness • Identifies the main points of the articles with a considerable effectiveness
Understands with a high degree of effectiveness • Identifies the main points of the articles with a high degree of effectiveness
0 / 100
Information on sources
Contains incorrect info regarding article title, author name, and article source and date.
Contains mostly somewhat correct info regarding article title, author name, and article source and date
Contains all correct info regarding article title, author name, and article source and date.
Contains all correct information regarding article title, author name, and article source and date.
0 / 100
• Analyzes the article in terms of the themes, info and ideas in the text and other sources employed • Uses ideas from the article and applies them to corresponding issues in entrepreneurship
• Analyses the information with limited effectiveness • Uses ideas from the article highlight to the reader about pertinent issues in entrepreneurship with little effectiveness
• Analyses the information somewhat effectively • Uses ideas from the article to highlight to the reader about pertinent issues in entrepreneurship somewhat effectively
• Analyses the information considerably • Uses ideas from the article to highlight to the reader about pertinent issues in entrepreneurship effectively
Analyses information clearly and effectively • Uses ideas from the article to highlight to the reader about pertinent issues in entrepreneurship to a very high of effectiveness
0 / 100
SCALE 1 (25)
SCALE 2 (50)
SCALE 3 (75)
SCALE 4 (100)
CRITERION 5 (16%)
SCALE 1 (25)
SCALE 2 (50)
SCALE 3 (75)
SCALE 4 (100)
CRITERION 6 (16%)
SCALE 1 (25)
SCALE 2 (50)
SCALE 3 (75)
SCALE 4 (100)
Communication of the analysis and synthesis is clear and concise and identifies and explains the correlation or diversity of ideas pertaining to highlights of article reviewed
Communicates information and ideas with limited effectiveness
Communicates information and ideas with some effectiveness
Communicates information and ideas with considerable effectiveness
Communicates information and ideas highly effectively
0 / 100
Grammar and mechanics
Contains numerous errors in grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation; substantially interferes with report’s readability.
Contains frequent errors in grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation; errors begin to interfere with report’s readability.
Contains accurate and proper grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation most of the time; errors do not interfere with report’s readability.
Consistently contains accurate and proper grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation.
0 / 100
APA style for references and citations
Consistently fails to use APA for references/citation
Inconsistently uses APA formatting for citations/references
Consistently uses APA for citations/ references
Clearly and consistently uses proper APA formatting for citations/references
- Final Project Draft 5.24.2020.docx
- by Rolandra Calloway
- Final Project Draft 5.24.2020.docx
- ORIGINALITY REPORT
- PRIMARY SOURCES
- Final Project Draft 5.24.2020.docx
- GRADEMARK REPORT
- FINAL GRADE
- GENERAL COMMENTS
- Instructor
- RUBRIC: ARTICLE REVIEW GRADING RUBRIC 0 / 100.002