9 PUBLIC HEALTH
FINAL PROJECT CHARTER
FINAL PROJECT CHARTER
FINAL PROJECT CHARTER
Final Project Charter
Learner’s Name
school
course
date
|
Final Project Charter |
|
SWOT Analysis |
|
Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis is a framework that helps an organization analyze an organization’s competitive standing. It evaluates an organization based on its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Strengths and weaknesses are current internal aspects, while opportunities and threats are future external factors (“SWOT analysis,” 2018). In this assessment, a SWOT analysis is conducted to identify the SWOT of the Coronary Artery Disease Reduction and Early Detection (CADRED) project, which focuses on reducing the mortality rate due to ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) through early diagnosis and treatment at SG Hospital. The conventional treatment procedures for STEMI are fibrinolytic therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). |
|
Strengths |
|
· The project team is made up of individuals with demonstrated skills and remarkable experiences that are relevant to the project. · The project will focus on the quality measures of the organization through an improvement in key statistics such as mortality rate. · Using electronic health records (EHRs) will improve quality of care provided to patients. · The high-priority status of the project will ensure immediate intrahospital transfer for patients who require special care, which will improve patient retention and the care given to patients. · Additionally, there are adequate referral protocols in place to prevent all forms of referral leakage. |
|
Weaknesses |
|
· Patients who have incomplete medical records may have more risks than estimated because of insufficient data about contraindications. · There is no guarantee that patients will follow postprocedural guidelines such as stopping smoking or changing their diet, which are necessary for them to maintain their health after PCI or fibrinolytic therapy. · Studies by Cheng et al. (2019) suggest that there is a high chance of incidence of restenosis after PCI. This may not be diagnosed in patients after PCI if they do not return for subsequent checkups. This increased risk of restenosis is seen in women, individuals with unstable angina, and individuals with myocardial infarction. Postoperative symptoms such as anxiety and depression may be overlooked. |
|
Opportunities |
|
· The use of EHRs and the latest ECG technology will provide sufficient significant data that will allow the automation of the diagnosis process, leading to accurate results. · Psychological therapy may be recommended for patients who display postoperative symptoms such as anxiety and depression, decreasing referral leakage. · Fibrinolytic therapy is effective at reducing the likelihood of medical conditions such as myocardial infarction that have an elevated risk of occurrence in patients who smoke and have bad dietary habits. · The project also creates the opportunity to raise awareness about lifestyle choices that will help prevent coronary artery diseases or help in successful recovery. |
|
Threats |
|
· The risk of hemorrhagic complications following fibrinolytic therapy cannot be monitored effectively. This will reduce the success rate of the therapy. · The treatment provided can be affected in certain rare cases in which patients may not show any clinical symptoms of restenosis. · There may be a slight risk of allergic reactions to the contrast dye and an even smaller risk of infection after PCI. |
|
Known Major Risks |
[Type here]
FINAL PROJECT CHARTER
FINAL PROJECT CHARTER
1
1
1
The threats and weaknesses that are related to the project execution have been ranked below based on their risk level.
Risk Level
(Low, Medium, Risk
High)
High Risk of losing data and data manipulation when using EHRs
Risk of violating Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) guidelines
High on data privacy and confidentiality
Risk of high employee turnover and the need to train new project team members on the
Medium
protocols and guidelines designed for the project
Risk of cultural disparity and ineffective communication between team members and
Medium Low Risk of budget overruns and delays in schedule
interdisciplinary teams
Risk of nonacceptance of new EHR systems by project team members and nonadherence to
Low the guidelines designed for their implementation.
Commented [BI1]: SME comment: Yes these are risks to the PATIENT, but this section refers more to categorizing the risk as it pertains to project execution, not the actual therapy. For example, things that may impede execution of the new protocol might be: high staff turnover, multiple EMR systems in play, patient population served (poor, indigent, cultural disparity).
Other types of risks to consider would be administrative personnel changes (i.e. new ED director), or say the hospital was in the process of implementing a new EMR system, this might present as a high risk item that could tie up resources. So you see, this specific section pertains to risks to project execution.
Commented [BI2R1]: The risks pertaining to the project execution have been included in the table as explained in the comment above.
FINAL PROJECT CHARTER
FINAL PROJECT CHARTER
FINAL PROJECT CHARTER
1
1
1
Ethical Considerations The ethical considerations of this project are based on standards set by the institutional review board of SG Hospital and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which makes informed consent before any procedure an absolute necessity.
· All possible risks with a probability of occurrence that is greater than 1% should be discussed with patients before they are asked to sign the consent form.
· Patients who are 18 years of age and above solely retain the right to make personal decisions regarding their health care.
· Only the cardiologist who is part of the CADRED project has the authority to discuss the risks associated with procedures and obtain consent from patients.
· The confidentiality of all medical records must be maintained and protected as per HIPAA standards, and only the project team members must have access to them. Prior permission through legal release forms must be obtained from patients before using data. All activities in the hospital database must be tracked, and any transfer of data must be approved by the project manager who will ensure compliance with HIPAA (Bowen, 2018).
· Patients must have access to their protected health information (PHI) on request. The PHI should be shared only with the patients’ consent, even with close family. It is communicated to the team that any violation of the patients’ privacy considerations is grounds for immediate termination.
· Patients who are women and/or elderly should receive special considerations because of the higher risk they face from the treatment procedure for STEMI. This is also applicable for patients with irregular angina and patients who have previously suffered a myocardial infarction.
Constraints
The project is expected to have minimal constraints because of the experience and expertise of the project team. One of the major constraints of the project is diagnosing postoperative psychological problems such as anxiety and depression in patients unless clear symptoms are noticed. Further, the treatment for the postoperative psychological problems is left to patients’ discretion.
Another constraint is ensuring and monitoring patients’ adherence to suggested lifestyle changes. Such monitoring is not viable in every case although noncompliance to recommended lifestyle changes could unduly reduce the success rate of the project. This noncompliance to recommended lifestyle changes, however, does not impact the operational and economic feasibility of the project as the choice of adhering to the suggested lifestyle changes is left to the patients’ discretion after they are informed of the risks of nonadherence.
The feasibility and implementation fidelity of the project can be affected by factors such as culture and race. According to Durlak and DuPre (2008), the acceptability of treatment procedures and the level of implementation of the project can vary in different community settings. However, thorough evaluation of existing data, comprehensive training, and the provision of strong technical support can help the project team successfully execute the project.
External Dependencies
The success of the project is determined by the number of referrals to the team.
The project depends heavily on other departments for referrals. In case of complications, the required specialist will be informed through the internal communication network. The required specialist will be on standby in specific cases where complications are anticipated. Comprehensive EHRs of the patients must be maintained by all departments for ease of transfer and to prevent the loss of pertinent information. External referrals from outgoing patients are also equally important, and the PHI provided must be verified wherever necessary. Communication Strategy
Commented [CC3]: Also consider the fidelity and feasibility of the new process, is there resources to support?
Commented [BI4R3]: Information pertaining to the fidelity and feasibility of the project has been added along with a resource supporting the information as requested. However, the resource supporting the information does not fall in the 5year time period.
|
Communication is a necessary skill in clinical practices and for the success of the project. It helps foster trust and coordination within the team and improve patient satisfaction (Lewis et al., 2016). SG Hospital has a digital internal communication network, which has made internal operations efficient. The project team has excellent interpersonal communication skills that allow for effective communication between different team members, external departments, and patients. The team follows the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation technique, which is a communication model employed during transitions. This technique helps communicate information in a structured manner within the team and avoid miscommunication (Lewis et al., 2016). Regular progress updates will be shared with the hospital team by the project manager through weekly team meetings. The project manager will also give a detailed report of the progress of the project to the CEO, CCO, and the board of directors on a monthly basis. This report will be a PowerPoint presentation and will cover all metrics that will evaluate the performance of the project. Gantt charts will be used to record and display the timelines of all the cases and to understand if there are better ways of scheduling for efficiency. Gantt charts will also be used to document the milestones of the project. There will also be a comprehensive report after every 3 months, which will cover a detailed analysis of the project and projections for the future. |
|||
|
Proposed Outcomes |
|||
|
Metric |
Outcome Measure |
Process Measure |
Countermeasure (optional) |
|
In-hospital risk-adjusted mortality |
Perioperative mortality in hospital among patients 18 years of age and older adjusted for the level of risk to the total number of patients 18 years of age and older on whom PCI was performed. |
The drugs administered on the arrival of a patient are recorded. Door-to-balloon (D2B) during emergency cardiac care is recorded separately for transferred patients (patients on whom PCI was performed after a referral from a hospital without the PCI facility) and nontransferred patients (patients on whom PCI was performed in the hospital of admission). Procedural complications, if any, that death is attributed to are not recorded or tested for. |
Patients’ medical history is to be considered carefully, and all preoperative tests and perioperative monitoring must be done as per protocol. |
|
PCI risk-adjusted bleeding |
Patients 18 years of age and older with a post-PCI bleeding event as a ratio to the total patients above 18 on whom PCI was performed after admission.
|
The drugs administered on the arrival of a patient and those prescribed at discharge are recorded. Patients who die within 24 hours of the procedure are excluded. Also, cases that indicate undetected contraindications due to oversight of information or unverified external data are not tested for.
|
N/A |
|
30-day readmission rate
|
Number of patients 18 years of age and older admitted for care within 30 days of discharge to the total number of patients 18 years of age and older discharged from the hospital. As per the 2010–2014 National Readmission database, the 30day readmission rate in the U.S. is 12.3%, and this results in a cumulative cost increase of 47.9% (Kim et al., 2018).
|
Drugs administered on the arrival of a patient and those prescribed at discharge are recorded along with the patient’s testimony on their adherence to recommended lifestyle changes. The cause of readmission is recorded. |
N/A |
|
Data Collection Plan |
|||
|
Data collection and maintenance are essential for the right diagnosis and treatment of any given case. A patient’s database includes the patient’s medical history and results from lab tests and diagnostic tests. Secondary data on the patient’s history will be transferred on a case-by-case basis when the referral is internal. When the referral is external, contraindications must be verified through tests and recorded. The data from the required tests before, during, and after treatment are recorded in EHRs. Primary data regarding health status are recorded by the cardiologist or the nurse to whom the duty is delegated. The confidentiality of information will have the foremost consideration. It should be ensured that a legal release is obtained from the patient before the data is used for evaluating the project, as mandated by HIPAA (Bowen, 2018). The transfer of all data is recorded in the database in a systematic manner. This will help avoid oversights such as using data without patients’ consent. Data collection is vital in verifying the success of the project in terms of measured outcomes. This data will be used to validate the importance of the project to the stakeholders. The data used for this purpose will be collected through Excel for analysis and subsequent presentation. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Data Collection Tool |
FINAL PROJECT CHARTER
FINAL PROJECT CHARTER
FINAL PROJECT CHARTER
1
1
1
|
Using Excel, develop a data collection tool, using appropriate headers for columns and rows. · Sheet 1: The data collection tool should include at least one filtering application and one analytical function (sum, mean, calculation). · Sheet 2: Add dummy data to demonstrate the operation above. · Sheet 3: Based on the dummy data, create a graphic representation (such as histogram, line graph, bar graph, or pie chart) to show how the data can be displayed and communicated.
|
|
|
References
Bowen, R. (2018). Patient data takes spotlight for privacy protection at HIMSS18. Briefings on HIPAA, 18(4), 1–4. Retrieved from http://library.capella.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fsearch.proquest.com%2Fdocview%2F2023696895%3Faccountid%3D27965
Cheng, G., Chang, F., Wang, Y., You, P., Chen, H., Han, W., . . . Min, Z. (2019). Factors influencing stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease: a clinical trial based on 1-year follow-up. Medical Science Monitor:
International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 25, 240–247. http://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.908692
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3-4), 327–350.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
Lewis, S. L., Bucher, L., Heitkemper, M. M., Harding, M. M., Kwong, J., & Roberts, D. (2016). Medical-surgical nursing: Assessment and management of clinical problems. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.in/books?id=f-
MCDQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
Kim, L. K., Yeo, I., Cheung, J. W., Swaminathan, R. V., Wong, S. C., Charitakis, K., . . . Feldman, D. N. (2018). Thirty-day readmission rates, timing, causes, and costs after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States: A national readmission database analysis 2010–2014. Journal of the American Heart Association, 7(18). http://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009863
SWOT analysis. (2018). In Helicon (Ed.), The Hutchinson unabridged encyclopedia with atlas and weather guide. Abington, UK:
Helicon.
1
1
1