informatics

profilesewentic
FinalProject.docx

Topic Presentation :

You can choose to do the assignments individually or with a group. There are no more than 5 members in a group. Each student will select a topic from the following list and do a literature survey from Journals or the Internet.  Prepare a summary (>1500 words) and present PowerPoint slides (>15 slides) using CaptureSpace on the Canvas. Each one makes the presentation individually.

The tutorial of using CaptureSpace is posted at:

https://www.uis.edu/informationtechnologyservices/teaching-and-learning/lecturecapture/Links to an external site.

Everyone is encouraged to make comments and share knowledge with each other. You need to respond to at least  two postings of your classmates.

Recommended Topics: 

1. Overview of Health Informatics

2. Healthcare Data, Information, and Knowledge

3. Computer and Network Architectures

4. Electronic Health Records

5. Standards and Interoperability

6. Health Information Exchange

7. Healthcare Data Analytics

8. Clinical Decision Support

9. Safety, Quality, and Value

10. Health Information Privacy and Security

11. Health Informatics Ethics

12. Consumer Health Informatics

13. Mobile Technology and mHealth

14. Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Practice Guidelines

15. Telemedicine

16. Public Health Informatics

 

Suggested Outline (Your paper should include the following sections.)

Paper Purpose and Scope Start with a simple statement of the topic for your term paper.  Describe the scope and environment of your topic.

Literature Review/Investigation You should have, at a minimum, at least  5 references from Information System related sources including Internet sites. 

Please check the following online resources from the UIS library:

http://libguides.uis.edu/content.php?pid=52861&sid=2259732Links to an external site.

If you wish to read papers more effectively, please check the following article to get some tips.

Jennifer Raff, (2017).  How to Read and Understand a Scientific Paper: A Step-by-Step Guide for Non-Scientists. Retrieved from  https://www.huffpost.com/entry/how-to-read-and-understand-a-scientific-paper_b_5501628Links to an external site.

Analysis and Discussion The section integrates the results of your investigative activities.  Justify the importance of your topic.  Focus on the key issues and observations you want to describe.  Use examples from your research in your analysis.

Synthesis In this section, you should build on the information from the previous sections to present conclusions and/or make recommendations.  This may take the form of applications to current work situations, predictions of future events, recommendations for further investigation, and/or summarization of the more interesting results.   

Grading (The total of the topic presentation counts 100 points + 10 points teamwork bonus)

1. Summary: 60 points

2. PowerPoint Slides: 10 points

3. CaptureSpace Recording: 10 points

4. Two Responses: 20 points

5. Teamwork Bonus: 10 points

Notes:

· References (Cited properly, using APA citation style: library.cornell.edu/newhelp/res_strategy/citing/apa.html#apa)

· Late submission will be subjected to a point reduction each day after the deadline until it runs down to zero.

Rubric

Topic Presentation Rubric (1)

Topic Presentation Rubric (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Information

20 pts

Full Marks

paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed -collect accurate information from a wide variety of quality sources

15 pts

Partial Marks

-paper is well researched in detail with accurate information from a variety of sources

10 pts

Partial Marks

-some aspects of paper is researched with some accurate information from limited sources

5 pts

Partial Marks

-limited information on topic with lack of research

0 pts

No Marks

No posting, or response but with minimum effort.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis / Critical Thinking

20 pts

Full Marks

-exceptionally critical, relevant and consistent connections made between evidence, subtopics, counter-arguments & the main topic showing excellent analysis

15 pts

Partial Marks

-consistent connections made between evidence, subtopics, counterarguments & the main topic showing good analysis

10 pts

Partial Marks

-some connections made between evidence, subtopics, counterarguments & the main topic showing analysis

5 pts

Partial Marks

-limited connections made between evidence, subtopics, counterarguments & the main topic -lack of analysis

0 pts

No Marks

No posting, or response but with minimum effort.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

10 pts

Full Marks

exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of subtopics that support the main topic with excellent transition between paragraphs

5 pts

Partial Marks

-clear and logical subtopic order that supports the main topic with good transitions between paragraphs

3 pts

Partial Marks

-somewhat clear and logical development of subtopics with adequate transitions between paragraphs

2 pts

Partial Marks

-paper lacks clear and logical development of ideas with weak transition between ideas and paragraphs

0 pts

No Marks

No posting, or response but with minimum effort.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics

10 pts

Full Marks

-paper is very concise, clear, with consistently proper grammar, spelling and paragraphing

5 pts

Partial Marks

-paper is clear, with mostly proper grammar, spelling and paragraphing

3 pts

Partial Marks

-paper has some errors in grammar, spelling and paragraphing

2 pts

Partial Marks

- inconsistent grammar, spelling and paragraphing throughout paper

0 pts

No Marks

No posting, or response but with minimum effort.

10 pts

Total Points: 60

Textbook: Robert E Hoyt, William R. Hersh. (2018), Health Informatics: Practical Guide, (7th Edition) Log in: file:///Users/oluwaseunojeyemi/Downloads/04b217bb-7cb2-49de-b280-dbb095b54b97.pdf