Inferential Statistics in Decision-making

profileramswork
FinalpracticetestANSWERS1.docx

Final practice test

Select the correct test, apply the test, and communicate the answer according to the handbook.

1. What effect does noise pollution have on helpfulness? A person with a cast on one arm gets out a car and drops an armload of books in front of pedestrians. Will the pedestrians help? Maybe. Sometimes there was a loud gasoline lawn mower operating nearby when the books were dropped and sometimes the mower was not operating. Of the 25 pedestrians who could have helped when the mower was operating, four did so. Of the 25 who could have helped when the mower was quiet, 20 did so. Of the 25 who could have helped when the mower was operating, four did so.

The chi square test is the best choice. The results were significant, (, (X2 [1, N=50] = 20.51, p < .001). Reject the null hypothesis. Pedestrians are significantly less likely to help in the presence of a loud noise.

 

Observed

Expected

(O-E)2

(O-E)2 /E

noise helped

4

12

64

5.333333

no noise helped

20

12

64

5.333333

noise did not help

21

13

64

4.923077

no noise did not help

5

13

64

4.923077

X2

20.51282

2. A leader wanted to know if there was a difference in employee attendance rates based on the shift that employees work.

Here is the data:

First shift

Second shift

Third shift

0

2

3

1

1

2

1

2

4

1

1

1

1

1

3

0

1

2

1

2

4

2

1

1

3

Perform the test, report the results, and complete any additional tests.

Answer: The ANOVA is the best choice. There was a significant difference between the employee attendance based on shift, (f [2,22] = 9.60, p < .01). Post hoc independent sample t-tests were conducted. There was a significant difference between attendance between first (M = .89) and second shift (M=1.42), (t [14] = 1.87, p < .05). There was a significant difference between first (M = .89) and third shift (M= 2.56), (t [16] = 3.91, p < .01). There was a significant difference between second shift (M=1.42) and third shift (M= 2.56), (t [14] = 2.42, p < .05).

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

First shift

9

8

0.888889

0.361111

Second shift

7

10

1.428571

0.285714

Third shift

9

23

2.555556

1.277778

ANOVA

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

12.9346

2

6.467302

9.597088

0.001008

3.443357

Within Groups

14.8254

22

0.673882

Total

27.76

24

 

 

 

 

 

First shift

Second shift

Mean

0.888888889

1.428571429

Variance

0.361111111

0.285714286

Observations

9

7

Pooled Variance

0.328798186

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

df

14

t Stat

-1.867600341

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.041446865

t Critical one-tail

1.761310136

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.082893729

t Critical two-tail

2.144786688

 

 

First shift

Third shift

Mean

0.888888889

2.555556

Variance

0.361111111

1.277778

Observations

9

9

Pooled Variance

0.819444444

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

df

16

t Stat

-3.905667329

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.000629328

t Critical one-tail

1.745883676

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.001258656

t Critical two-tail

2.119905299

 

 

Second shift

Third shift

Mean

1.428571429

2.555555556

Variance

0.285714286

1.277777778

Observations

7

9

Pooled Variance

0.85260771

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

df

14

t Stat

-2.421884652

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.014800274

t Critical one-tail

1.761310136

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.029600549

t Critical two-tail

2.144786688

 

3. A researcher wanted to know if two educator created assessments assessed the same skills. Students were given both assessments. The data are below:

Assessment A

Assessment B

Student 1

10

11

Student 2

10

12

Student 3

10

13

Student 4

10

14

Student 5

20

19

Student 6

15

18

Student 7

25

18

Student 8

25

18

Student 9

25

18

Student 10

14

18

Student 11

14

18

Student 12

14

18

Answer: The best choice for this scenario is the regression, because the data is paired and you are looking for similarities. There was a significant relationship between the assessments, (r [10] = .70, p < .05). According to Cohen, this would be a large effect size.

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics

Multiple R

0.701889326

R Square

0.492648626

Adjusted R Square

0.441913488

Standard Error

4.594106787

Observations

12

ANOVA

 

df

SS

MS

F

Significance F

Regression

1

204.9418

204.9418

9.710205796

0.010946026

Residual

10

211.0582

21.10582

Total

11

416

 

 

 

4. With the same data from question #9, what if the researcher wanted to know if the students performed differently on two assessments?

Answer: The paired samples t-test would determine if the scores for each student were different. There was no difference in the student’s performance on assessment A (M = 16) and assessment B ( M = 16.25), (t [11] =.19, p > .05). (Practical note- it was a huge hint here that the previous answer was highly correlated, which means that there couldn’t be a significant difference here).

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

 

Assessment A

Assessment B

Mean

16

16.25

Variance

37.81818182

8.204545455

Observations

12

12

Pearson Correlation

0.701889326

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

df

11

t Stat

-0.187666682

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.427277438

t Critical one-tail

1.795884819

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.854554876

t Critical two-tail

2.20098516