Annotated biblography and outline

TgHtv88

FinalPaperRubric2020.docx

Home >Business & Finance homework help >Management homework help >Annotated biblography and outline

Format for Final Paper – LEAD 605

· Title Page

· Research Environment (specific to you, narrative format) (1 – 2 pages)

· Description of research environment – mission, goals

· Your role in organization – title, responsibilities, length of time in position/environment

· Critical Reflection/Critical Incident (Problem) – description of stakeholders, analysis of problem

· State your primary research question

· Research Topics (general information about your topic) (1 – 2 pages)

· Context of the problem/Literature review

· This section should be a written description of the overarching problem(s) supported by references to other sources of research (minimum 5 references, APA format). You should look at your topic(s) from local and global perspectives and challenge any assumptions, effects on stakeholders, etc.

· References Page – APA format required

(SEE RUBRIC – Next page) Rubric – LEAD 605 Final Paper

Rubric
	Excellent (4 pts)	Acceptable (3 pts)	Needs Improvement (2 pts)	Poor (1 pt)
Description/Critical Analysis of Research Environment (1, 20%)	•Research environment is clearly described and critically analyzed in great depth. Primary research question stated.	•Research environment is described and critically analyzed. Primary research question stated.	•Research environment is somewhat described with minimal critical analysis. Primary research question stated, but needs revision.	• Research environment is not clearly described with little or no critical analysis. No primary research question stated.
Paper Format/Sections Included (1, 20%)	•2-3 pages with APA-Style used correctly • Concise and clear paper that includes assigned format: List facts, describes/critically analyzes research environment, identifies various areas of possible research, uses references	•1-2 pages with writing clear and readable.• Includes assigned format: List facts, describes/critically analyzes research environment, identifies various areas of possible research, uses references	•1 page with some APA-Style formatting errors. • Includes majority of assigned format, uses minimal references.	•1 page with writing style ambiguous or verbose. APA-Style not followed/assigned format not followed.
Quality of Local and Global Perspectives (1, 20%)	• Description of research environment /possible research areas from participatory worldview. • Clearly stated problem(s) with analysis of local and global issues. • Inclusion of impact on internal and external stakeholders.	• Description of research environment/possible research areas includes organizational viewpoint. • Immediate systemic contextual factors included. • Clearly stated problem with analysis of organizational issues. • Inclusion of impact on stakeholders internal to organization only.	• Description of research environment/possible research areas includes peers’ viewpoints. • Some contextual factors included. Inclusion of immediate participants only. • Statement of issues includes peers’ perspectives.	• Description of research environment/possible research areas from egocentric viewpoint. • Issues identified from personal perspective only. • Narrow view of participants.
Literature Review (1, 20%)	• Comprehensive literature review included. 5 references using APA guidelines – utilizes current, scholarly references	• Literature review included with 5 references using APA guidelines. Majority of references are current and from current, scholarly references	• Incomplete or weak literature review. References are not all current or from acceptable references	• No or little literature review included; less than 5 references, APA guidelines not followed, references not acceptable
Terminology of Discipline Applied/Writing Quality (1, 20%)	• Uses course and professional terminology in appropriate contexts. • Writing focused on the issue and represents a high level of scholarly writing.	• Uses course and professional terminology in appropriate contexts. • Writing focused on the issue and well written in standard English.	• Uses course and professional terminology in inappropriate contexts. • Writing not concise and difficult to follow.	• Uses course terminology rarely. Writing contains many grammatical errors and does not communicate the issue.