Paper
Research/Topical Paper Grading Rubric
|
Category |
Unacceptable (Below Standards) |
Acceptable (Meets Standards) |
Good (Occasionally Exceeds) |
Excellent (Exceeds Standards) |
SCORE |
|
Introduction |
Does not adequately convey topic. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. Lacks adequate thesis statement. |
Conveys topic, but not key question(s). Describes subtopics to be reviewed. General thesis statement |
Conveys topic and key question(s). Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. General thesis statement. |
Strong introduction of topic’s key question(s), terms. Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. Specific thesis statement. |
/10 |
|
Focus & Sequencing |
Little evidence material is logically organized into topic, subtopics, or related to topic. Many transitions are unclear or nonexistent. |
Most material clearly related to subtopic, main topic. Material may not be organized within subtopics. Attempts to provide variety of transitions |
All material clearly related to subtopic, main topic and logically organized within subtopics. Clear, varied transitions linking subtopics, and main topic. |
All material clearly related to subtopic, main topic. Strong organization and integration of material within subtopics. Strong transitions linking subtopics, and main topic. |
/10 |
|
Support |
Few sources supporting thesis. Sources insignificant or unsubstantiated. |
Sources generally acceptable but not peer-reviewed research (evidence) based. |
Sources well selected to support thesis with some research in support of thesis. |
Strong peer-reviewed research based support for thesis. |
/10 |
|
Conclusion |
Does not summarize evidence with respect to thesis statement. Does not discuss the impact of researched material on topic. |
Review of key conclusions. Some integration with thesis statement. Discusses impact of researched material on topic. |
Strong review of key conclusions. Strong integration with thesis statement. Discusses impact of researched material on topic. |
Strong review of key conclusions. Strong integration with thesis statement. Insightful discussion of impact of the researched material on topic. |
/10 |
|
Grammar & Mechanics |
Grammatical errors or spelling & punctuation substantially detract from the paper. |
A few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors which interfere with reading paper. |
Grammatical errors or spelling & punctuation are rare and do not detract from the paper. |
Paper is free of grammatical, spelling, & punctuation errors |
/10 |
|
APA Style & Communication |
Errors in APA style detract substantially from the paper. Word choice is informal in tone. Writing is choppy, with many awkward or unclear passages. |
Errors in APA style are noticeable. Word choice occasionally informal in tone. Writing has a few awkward or unclear passages. |
Rare APA errors which do not detract from paper. |
No errors in APA style. Scholarly style. Writing is flowing and easy to follow. |
/15 |
|
Citations & References |
Reference and citation errors/ omissions detract significantly from paper. |
A few references or citations missing or incorrectly written. |
Reference or citations rarely missing or incorrectly written. |
All references and citations are correctly written and present. |
/15 |
|
Grade = |
Total Points |
/80 |
APA Errors
APA MAJOR errors:
· APA reference errors: ABC order, 1:1 reference/citation)
· APA punctuation and capitalization errors
· APA citation errors: incorrect author order, incorrect et al. usage
· Title Page: header, spacing, contents, etc.
· APA numbers
· APA verb problems: verb tense, verb-subject-article agreement
· Pronoun errors: which, that, who, whom
· Format errors: incorrect line, letter, word spacing, pagination
· Use of abbreviations or numerals to start sentences
· Undefined abbreviations
· Non-professional writing/tone
· Lack of empirical evidence for points made
APA Minor errors :
· Wrong font/wrong size font/wrong color font
· Inappropriate use of a secondary source (lack of “cited in . . .)
· Inappropriate use of personal pronouns, excessive abbreviations
· Occasional problems with hanging indents
· Using ampersands in text
(The Psychology Department at San José State University is acknowledged for the basic structure of this form.) Otte 12/18