Sexual harassment in the Workplace paper.

Final Paper Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts

Introduction

The introduction (thesis) is inviting, states the initiative, and previews the needs and students that the initiative serves. 10.0 pts

The introduction (thesis) states the initiative and previews the needs and students that the initiative serves, but is not particularly inviting to the reader. 8.0 pts

The introduction (thesis) states the initiative, but does not adequately preview the need and students it serves nor is it particularly inviting to the reader. 7.0 pts

There is no clear introduction (thesis) of the initiative. 5.0 pts

10.0 pts

Content

Relevant, telling, quality details give the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable. Work is clear, precise, well-reasoned, and insightful. Demonstrates excellent understanding of the issue and evidence of its effectiveness. Paper addresses all assigned points. 40.0 pts

Supporting details and information are relevant, but one key issue or portion or evidence of the initiative's effectiveness is unsupported. Work is clear, precise, and well-reasoned. Demonstrates good understanding of evidence-based evaluation. Paper address assigned points. 35.0 pts

Supporting details and information are relevant, but several key issues or evidence of the initiative's effectiveness are unsupported. Demonstrates adequate preparation. Paper addresses most assigned points. 30.0 pts

Supporting details and information are typically unclear or not related to the topic. Demonstrates inadequate evidence of effectiveness. Paper inadequately addresses assigned points. 18.0 pts

40.0 pts

Critical Thinking

Offers analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of evidence in a manner that enhances student’s learning. Provides insight. Provides pertinent and legitimate information that supports the main points and shows thoughtful, in-depth analysis including what is still not known. 40.0 pts

Offers interpretation and analysis of evidence. Information provides reasonable support for main points and demonstrates some analysis. May provide some insight. 33.0 pts

Offers some analysis of the effectiveness of the initiative, however, it is mostly on an anecdotal level. Provides few insights. 30.0 pts

Demonstrates poor thinking and performance, representing thinking that is unclear, imprecise, and poorly reasoned. No evidence of effectiveness is provided. 18.0 pts

40.0 pts

Grammar, Spelling, and Word Choice.

Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distracts the reader from the content. Word choice is consistently accurate and appropriate. 25.0 pts

Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Word choice is generally appropriate. 20.0 pts

Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Work choice is adequate and some words may be used inappropriately. 17.0 pts

Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distracts the reader from the content. Many words are used inappropriately. 10.0 pts

25.0 pts

Sources and APA

All sources used for quotes and facts are credible and cited correctly. APA format is used accurately and consistently throughout the paper and on the reference page. Scholarly sources are appropriate. 25.0 pts

All sources used for quotes and facts are credible and most are cited correctly. APA format is used with minor errors. Scholarly sources are appropriate. 20.0 pts

Most sources used for quotes and facts are credible and cited correctly. There are frequency errors in APA format. 17.0 pts

Many sources used for quotes and facts are less than credible (suspect) is and/or are not cited correctly. Format of the paper is not APA. 10.0 pts

25.0 pts

Conclusion

The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand the initiative including its importance as well as how and why it is effective. 10.0 pts

The conclusion is recognizable and ties up most aspects of the initiative that contribute to its importance and effectiveness. 8.0 pts

The conclusion is recognizable and does not tie up aspects of the initiative that contribute to its importance and effectiveness. 7.0 pts

There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends. 5.0 pts

10.0 pts

Total Points: 150.0