Final Paper-Philosophy
|
|
Grade A |
Grade B |
Grade C |
Grade D |
|
Thesis |
There is a clear statement of the main conclusion of the paper. |
The thesis is obvious, but there is no single clear statement of it. |
The thesis is present, but must be uncovered or reconstructed from the text of the paper. |
There is no thesis. |
|
Support |
Reasons for believing the thesis are explained in a clear and organized way. |
The reasons for believing the thesis are clear, but they are disorganized and/or not well explained. |
The supporting claims are unclear and must be reconstructed from the text of the paper. |
There is no support. The paper merely restates the thesis. Or, if there is support, it is much more likely to be false than true. |
|
Philosophy |
The paper provides a clear and accurate summary of a philosopher’s ideas and explains how they apply to your view of human freewill. |
The summary of a philosopher’s ideas is mostly accurate and the connection of these ideas to the film is generally explained well. |
The summary of the philosopher’s ideas is vague or only partially correct. The relationship of the philosopher’s ideas to your view of freewill is never clearly stated. |
The summary of the philosopher’s ideas is missing or largely inaccurate. The explanation of how these ideas relate to the student’s position is either absent or unconvincing. |
|
Examples |
Detailed examples from your life that clearly support the thesis. |
The student generally explains the thesis without specific examples. |
There are examples that somewhat support the thesis, but the student is not aware of the kind of support they provide. |
There are no examples or the examples do not support the thesis. |
PAGE