SSCI316
|
|
EXCEPTIONAL (4) |
COMMENDABLE (3) |
ACCEPTABLE (2) |
UNACCEPTABLE (1) |
|
ORGANIZATION Introduction |
HIGHLY ENGAGING introduction provides THOUGHTFUL background |
ENGAGING introduction provides RELEVANT background information |
Introduction provides SOME relevant background information. . |
Introduction provides LIMITED and/or IRRELEVANT background information. TOO BRIEF. |
|
Body |
ALL body paragraphs develop a single topic, have topic sentences and CLEAR transitions allowing the paper to FLOW LOGICALLY. FOCUSED and CONTROLLED. |
MOST body paragraphs develop a single topic, have topic sentences and transitions allowing the paper to FLOW LOGICALLY, FOCUSED AND COTROLLED. |
MOST body paragraphs develop a single topic, have topic sentences, but information appears as UNCONNECTED CHUNKS. Paragraphs still have a sense of logical order. |
MANY body paragraphs LACK topic sentences or topic sentences and body content do not always match. MANY body paragraphs develop more than one topic. Paragraphs DO NOT follow a LOGICAL order. Poorly organized. |
|
Conclusion |
INSIGHTFUL conclusion revisits thesis and main points. CONVINCINGLY PERSUASIVE. |
Conclusion revisits thesis and main points. PERSUASIVE. |
Conclusion revisits thesis and main points. It does what it has to—but PERSUASIVE. |
POOR conclusion does not revisit thesis, and main points and/or conclusion are omitted. |
|
CONTENT Thesis |
INTRIGUING AND FOCUSED Thesis CLEARLY shapes purpose of paper and matches the content. Conveys an ATTITUDE in support or against. |
FOCUSED thesis shapes purpose of paper and matches content. Conveys an ATTITUDE in support or against. |
Thesis ADEQUATELY shapes purpose of paper and matches content but is only a list. BEGINS to convey an ATTITUDE. |
Thesis FAILS to shape purpose of paper and/or does not match the content of the paper. Thesis is CONFUSED or FACTUAL or is NOT PROVEN. |
|
Research |
Multiple sources SKILLFULLY interwoven in body paragraphs demonstrating RELEVANT, THOROUGH, and SOPHISTICATED support of thesis. Writer manages information well and avoids redundancy and reliance on direct quotes. |
Multiple sources CONSISTENTLY interwoven in body paragraphs demonstrating RELEVANT and THOROUGH support of thesis. Writer manages the information and avoids redundancy and reliance on direct quotes. |
MOST information supports the thesis by using a SINGLE source per body paragraph. Info. is STACKED, LISTED, REDUNDANT, or CONTINUALLY PARAPHRASED. Some reliance on direct quotes. |
SOME information supports the thesis, but information is LIMITED, IRRELEVANT, REDUNDANT, WEAK or INACCURATE. Paper exhibits information dumping. Heavy reliance on direct quotes. |
|
Voice |
Paragraphs show SKILLFUL integration of student’s own words with researched info. ELOQUENT word choice and transitions. ALL body paragraphs end with student’s observation or conclusion. Shows a CLEAR understanding of the topic |
Paragraphs show BALANCE between student voice and researched info. Body paragraphs end with student’s observations or conclusion. Analysis of info shows and understanding of the topic. |
There is SOME student voice integrated with researched info. Analysis of info shows SOME understanding of the topic. |
Paragraph conclusions are quotes or are missing. No student interpretation is evident. Analysis of info. shows a LACK of understanding of the topic. Much of the paper is written in “I,” “YOU,” or “WE.” |
|
Mechanics |
Grammar, word usage, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure errors RARELY occur, but DO NOT OBSCURE MEANING. |
Grammar, word usage, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure errors SELDOM occur, but DO NOT OBSCURE MEANING. |
Grammar, word usage, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure errors OCCASIONALLY occur, but DON’T OBSCURE MEANING |
Grammar, word usage, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure errors FREQUENTLY occur and OBSCURE MEANING. |
|
Work Cited |
Works cited page properly formatted. |
Works cited page has very few errors |
Works cited page has many errors. |
Works cited page is missing or improperly formatted. |
|
Paper Length |
Over and above requirement. |
At or slightly above requirement. |
Below requirement. |
Extremely below requirement. |
Instructions: This paper must follow a format of your choice (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc) You will select a subject of your choice that relates to the class and take a position in support or against, and argue it with documentation of no less than 4 peer reviewed (scholarly) articles and 4 resources from class (textbook is fine or anything in learning modules). There is a 2500 word minimum and NO maximum words on this assignment. You must have a title page and a works cited page, with the requisite number of pages on the body of the essay. (always double spaced)
Suggestions for subject matter:
· Is racism ever justified?