Global Inequality Essay

profileRoyal123
FinalEssayGlobalInequalityRubric.docx

Final Essay Global Inequality Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Thoroughness, Thoughtfulness, Accuracy: Concepts and Arguments

25 pts

Perfect

23.75 pts

Excellent

Correctly uses concepts and arguments from relevant course materials to address the topic. Explanation is clear and thoughtful.

21.25 pts

Good

Correctly uses concepts and arguments from course materials to address the topic, but may not be complete, fully supported, or entirely clear.

18.75 pts

Satisfactory

Correctly uses some course concepts and arguments to address the topic. Explanation may be vague, incomplete, or lacking supporting evidence from texts

16.25 pts

Poor

Offers generally incorrect and/or incoherent explanation of concepts and arguments to address the topic.

0 pts

Missing

Does not address the topic and/or uses non-course materials.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Thoroughness, Thoughfulness, Accuracy: Using all of assigned materials.

25 pts

Perfect

23.75 pts

Excellent

Uses all of the required materials. Characterization of materials is accurate and thorough. Relevant points are made.

21.25 pts

Good

Uses the required materials, but characterization is not thorough.

18.75 pts

Satisfactory

Does not use all of the required materials. While some key points are addressed, others are ignored. Problems with accuracy.

16.25 pts

Poor

Makes little use of the required materials, misses key ideas and points, and/or inaccurately characterizes arguments.

0 pts

Missing

Does not make any meaningful reference to the required materials.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Thoroughness, Thoughfulness, Accuracy: Evidence

25 pts

Perfect

23.75 pts

Excellent

Uses course materials to present clear, complete, and accurate supporting evidence.

21.25 pts

Good

Uses evidence to present a clear and accurate explanation. Some key points are missing and/or unclear.

18.75 pts

Satisfactory

Uses some evidence, but may be vague, incomplete, or partially inaccurate.

16.25 pts

Poor

Largely inaccurate or incoherent presentation of evidence.

0 pts

Missing

Does not present evidence and/or uses non-course materials.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization: Introduction and Thesis

5 pts

Perfect

4.75 pts

Excellent

Clearly introduces assigned topic; identifies relevant questions/issues; presents specific thesis on assigned topic.

4.25 pts

Good

Clearly introduces assigned topic; clearly states thesis on assigned topic.

3.75 pts

Satisfactory

Vague introduction of assigned topic; vague thesis on assigned topic or thesis implied rather than stated.

3.25 pts

Poor

Introduces something other than assigned topic, thesis is not on topic, and/or introduction and thesis seriously misinterpret topic.

0 pts

Missing

Does not introduce topic or thesis.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization: Conclusion

5 pts

Perfect

4.75 pts

Excellent

Presents logical, clearly reasoned conclusions based on evidence.

4.25 pts

Good

Presents conclusions consistent with evidence, but reasoning may not be clearly explained.

3.75 pts

Satisfactory

Presents conclusions consistent with evidence but does not present reasoning.

3.25 pts

Poor

Presents conclusions at odds with evidence or reasoning.

0 pts

Missing

Does not present conclusions.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization: Overall

5 pts

Perfect

4.75 pts

Excellent

Essay is generally well-organized, with clear sections arranged in a manner that elaborates logically on the thesis statement.

4.25 pts

Good

Some problems with organization. Ideas, data, and evidence may be grouped illogically.

3.75 pts

Satisfactory

Significant organizational problems. Illogical development of argument and/or missing sections.

3.25 pts

Poor

Extensive organizational problems. Illogical development of argument and/or missing sections.

0 pts

Missing

No discernible organization.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Clarity and Character of Writing and Citation of sources.

5 pts

Perfect

4.75 pts

Excellent

Writing is always clear and comprehensible. Essay is written in the student's own words, demonstrating that he/she has assimilated the material. Appropriate citations provided for quoted material and sources of data and key ideas.

4.25 pts

Good

Writing is mostly clear, but not always. Some awkward turns of phrase. Appropriate citations provided for quoted material and sources of data and key ideas.

3.75 pts

Satisfactory

Writing is often difficult to comprehend. Many awkward formulations. May rely too much on quotes. Essay not written in student's own words.

3.25 pts

Poor

Writing is extremely unclear and/or citations not provided for quoted material.

0 pts

Missing

Writing is generally impossible to comprehend and/or contains plagiarized material.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Spelling, Grammar, Typos

5 pts

Perfect

4.75 pts

Excellent

Few or no spelling and grammar errors. No typos. Serious effort made to submit high-quality work.

4.25 pts

Good

Some spelling and grammar problems and/or typos.

3.75 pts

Satisfactory

Significant grammar and spelling problems and/or typos

3.25 pts

Poor

Substantial grammar and spelling mistakes and/or typos. Work appears sloppy, slapdash.

0 pts

Missing

Grammar, spelling, and issues with typos are so extensive that no credit can be granted.

5 pts