Social Science - Philosophy homework

Write answers to  both of the questions given below. Write as many double-spaced pages as it takes you to answer the questions sufficiently. The minimum requirement is 1,500 words for each question.

Play Video

 https://youtu.be/7C-VTPJxWlw

Essay Question 2: Discuss what can we learn from Fairphone and from Douglas Rushkoff, in  Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus  (especially in  Chapter 5, pages 228-232), about how to implement the “post-growth climate mitigation scenarios” that Jason Hickel and others talk about in this article ( PDF #1): 

< https://static1.squarespace.com/static/59bc0e610abd04bd1e067ccc/t/610aad405ae4b220c99de20a/1628089673888/Hickel+et+al+-+Urgent+need+for+post-growth+climate+mitigation+scenarios.pdf>

Essay Question 3: Write an essay on how moral theory determines whether euthanasia is ethical or not, drawing upon your study this semester of life issues. Do you think a doctor could omit to give antibiotics to a disabled child and plead that s/he foresaw the death but did not intend it? Give two examples — one in which euthanasia is the motive, and one in which it is not — and use the Principle of Double Effect (“PDE”) to evaluate the morality of the doctor’s actions in each example: see the PDF #2 (on Moodle) of David Oderberg,  Applied Ethics, page 80 (note: Oderberg’s discussion of this question begins on page 74, and “PDE” is mentioned on page 76).  PDF #2 (on Moodle):

Oderberg-on-Euthanasia.pdf