NEED IN 5 HOURS or LESS

Thank you for sharing your thoughts in our final discussion. I like how you explained both sides of the scenario. What would you do in this situation? How would you make your ethical decision? Is there more than one ethical option?

Read the Classmate’s Discussion (BELOW) and ANSWER THE ABOVE QUESTIONS

CLASSMATE’S DISCUSSION

As a social worker running a community violence-prevention program and working with gang members, the principle of "do no harm" must guide your decision-making. The kids trust you and may disclose some of their less-than-savory activities. At the same time, the police often ask you for information about the kids. This situation poses a dilemma, and it is crucial to consider the potential consequences of both disclosing and withholding information.

The general rule on social worker disclosure of client information without client consent is that such disclosure is only necessary when it is to prevent significant, foreseeable, and imminent danger to the client or other identifiable individuals ((Miller & Mirza, 2009). Therefore, the social worker should only disclose the activities of gang members when such disclosure would prevent harm to the gang members or any other identifiable person. However, it is crucial to ensure that the disclosure of information does not compromise the trust and confidentiality that the young people in the program have with the social worker. Confidentiality and trust are crucial in establishing a relationship with these young people and breaking that trust could damage the effectiveness of the violence-prevention program (Miller & Mirza, 2009).

As social workers strive to do "good," they are obligated to act in the best interests of their patients, while also considering the wider community. This can create a conflict of duties, where a social worker may be torn between their obligations to their clients and their obligations to the wider society. In such situations, social workers are expected to prioritize the well-being and rights of their clients, but they must also consider the potential impact of their actions on the broader community. If there are issues affecting the community that are unrelated to the social worker's current engagement, they may still have an ethical obligation to become involved if they believe they can make a positive impact. However, they must also consider their primary responsibility to their current clients and ensure that their involvement does not compromise the quality of care they are providing (McCarty & Clancy, 2002). When social workers do not fully understand a situation and their involvement may do as much harm as good, they should exercise caution and seek guidance from experienced colleagues or supervisors. They have an ethical obligation to ensure that their actions do not harm their clients or the wider community, and they should only act when they are confident that their involvement will have a positive impact.

References Miller, S. E., & Mirza, F.Y. (2009). Ethical decision-making in social work: Exploring personal and professional values. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 6(1).

McCarty, D., & Clancy, C. (2002). Telehealth: Implications for social work practice. Social Work, 47. 153-161