Exercise / Sport Analysis on a Volleyball Player

Final Project Analysis Course: Exercise Physiology Section 01 Spring Semester 2022 CO

Criteria Good to Excellent 10 points

Average to Good 7 points

Needs Improvement 4 points

Criterion Score

Skill description / 10

Metabolism / 10

Cardiovascular / 10

All required

information is

present and

accurate.

Information is well

developed with

significant depth

and detail.

Most required

information is

present, but may

have some

inaccuracies.

Information is

occasionally

supported with

depth and detail.

Missing some

required information

and contains

inaccurate

explanations.

Information is not

supported with

depth or detail

frequently

All required

information is

present and

accurate.

Information is well

developed with

significant depth

and detail.

Most required

information is

present, but may

have some

inaccuracies.

Information is

occasionally

supported with

depth and detail.

Missing some

required information

and contains

inaccurate

explanations.

Information is not

supported with

depth or detail

frequently

All required

information is

present and

accurate.

Information is well

developed with

significant depth

and detail.

Most required

information is

present, but may

have some

inaccuracies.

Information is

occasionally

supported with

depth and detail.

Missing some

required information

and contains

inaccurate

explanations.

Information is not

supported with

depth or detail

frequently

Criteria Good to Excellent 10 points

Average to Good 7 points

Needs Improvement 4 points

Criterion Score

Respiratory / 10

Neuromuscular / 10

Summary / 10

All required

information is

present and

accurate.

Information is well

developed with

significant depth

and detail.

Most required

information is

present, but may

have some

inaccuracies.

Information is

occasionally

supported with

depth and detail.

Missing some

required information

and contains

inaccurate

explanations.

Information is not

supported with

depth or detail

frequently

All required

information is

present and

accurate.

Information is well

developed with

significant depth

and detail.

Most required

information is

present, but may

have some

inaccuracies.

Information is

occasionally

supported with

depth and detail.

Missing some

required information

and contains

inaccurate

explanations.

Information is not

supported with

depth or detail

frequently

All required

information is

present and

accurate.

Information is well

developed with

significant depth

and detail.

Most required

information is

present, but may

have some

inaccuracies.

Information is

occasionally

supported with

depth and detail.

Missing some

required information

and contains

inaccurate

explanations.

Information is not

supported with

depth or detail

frequently

Criteria Good to Excellent 20 points

Average to Good 15 points

Needs Improvement 11 points

Criterion Score

Total / 80

Overall Score

Criteria Good to Excellent 20 points

Average to Good 15 points

Needs Improvement 11 points

Criterion Score

Writing Style and

Mechanics

/ 20Major ideas are clearly introduced

and flow smoothly

from one to another

in the order put

forth in the

instructions.

Transitions/section

headings make the

organization clear

and easy to follow.

No grammar or

spelling errors. Well

written in paragraph

form, in-text

citations are

present, clear, easy

to follow.

References are all

form academic

sources and

formatted

consistently.

Major ideas are

generally clear and

related to one

another, and flow in

the order put forth

in the instructions.

Transitions/section

headings are

evident, but not

perfected.

Occasional grammar

or spelling errors.

Adequately written

in a paragraph form,

contains some in-

text citations, clear,

reasonably easy to

follow. References

are mostly from

academic sources

and are formatted

appropriately.

Paper is

disorganized, does

not follow a logical

flow set forth in the

instructions. Major

ideas are

disconnected and

lacking

transitions/section

headings making the

paper difficult to

read.

Many grammar and

spelling errors

distract the reader.

Poorly written,

lacking in-text

citations and format,

unclear, hard to

follow. Paper

contains evidence of

plagiarism. Lacks

references following

a set format and/or

not from academic

sources.

Exceeds Expectations 68 points minimum

Meets Expectations 56 points minimum

Below Expectations 0 points minimum