Research Plan
EDUC 815
Final Exam Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Introduction |
10 points
Persuades the reader that the topic is important by using 3-4 of relevant and quality literature published within the last 5 years. Provides a detailed overview of the topic at hand and prepares the reader for the background section of the manuscript.
|
9 points
Persuades the reader that the topic is important by using 3-4 pieces of relevant and quality literature published within the last 5 years. Provides an overview of the topic at hand and prepares the reader for the background section of the manuscript.
|
1 to 8 points
Provides support for the topic by using less than 2 pieces of literature. Provides a minimal overview of the topic at hand.
|
0 points Not present |
|
Participants |
14 to 15 points
Clearly and accurately describes the target population, sample size, type of sample, and the sampling procedures. Provides demographic information and support for adequate sample size. |
13 points
Describes the target population, sample size, type of sample, and the sampling procedures. Provides demographic information and some support for adequate sample size. |
1 to 12 points
Somewhat describes target population, sample size, type of sample, and the sampling procedures. Does not provides demographic information and/or support for adequate sample size. |
0 points Not present |
|
Setting |
14 to 15 points
Important features of the site and treatment setting are clearly identified. The setting, especially the treatment setting is described in sufficient details so that the study could be replicated. |
13 points
Important features of the site and treatment setting are mentioned. The setting, especially the treatment setting needs to be described in detail but lacking some key features. |
1 to 12 points
Important features of the site and treatment setting are identified but not clearly. The setting is lacking some key features. |
0 points Not present |
|
Research Design |
14 to 15 points
Research design and all variables are clearly identified. Provides a logical and accurate rationale that is supported by research texts and other literature. |
13 points
Research design and most variables are identified. Provides a rationale that is supported by research texts and other literature. |
1 to 12 points
Research design and variables are inaccurately identified. Fails to provide a rationale that is supported by research texts and other literature. |
0 points Not present |
|
Instrumentation |
24 to 25 points
Clearly describes instrument including the name, purpose, and contents. Scales of measurement and the scoring procedures are clearly explained. Validity of the instrument is discussed using previous studies to establish validity. Reliability of the instrument is discussed including reliability coefficients. |
22 to 23 points
Describes instrument including the name, purpose, and contents. Scales of measurement and the scoring procedures are mentioned. Validity of the instrument is discussed. Reliability of the instrument is discussed. |
1 to 21 points
Describes instrument but leaves out some detail. Scales of measurement and the scoring procedures are not addressed. Validity and reliability are not accurately described. |
0 points Not present |
|
Procedures |
24 to 25 points
Identifies all steps in a manner that is easy to follow. Identifies ethical issues and IRB approval. Procedures are explained in sufficient detail so that the study can be replicated. Procedures align with the identified research design. Demonstrates clear understanding of the necessary steps required for accurate data collection. |
22 to 23 points
Identifies all steps required. Identifies ethical issues and IRB approval. Procedures are explained but missing key detail. Procedures align with the identified research design. Demonstrates partial understanding of the necessary steps required for accurate data collection. |
1 to 21 points
Fails to identify all steps required. Fails to identify ethical issues and IRB approval. Procedures are not adequately explained. Procedures do not align with the identified research design. Demonstrates partial understanding of the necessary steps required for accurate data collection. |
0 points Not present |
|
Analysis |
26 to 28 points
Analysis procedures clearly identified and explained. Provides a concise rationale for the type(s) of analysis chosen supported by a research textbook. Statistical procedures are consistent with the research questions, hypotheses, and type of data collected. Provides information about the chosen alpha level for each analysis, the assumption tests for each analysis, and the statistic that is planned to interpret the effect size. |
24 to 25 points
Analysis procedures identified and explained. Provides partial rationale for the type(s) of analysis chosen. Statistical procedures are consistent with the research questions, hypotheses, and type of data collected. Provides most information about the chosen alpha level for each analysis, the assumption tests for each analysis, and the statistic that is planned to interpret the effect size. |
1 to 23 points
Analysis procedures are not identified and explained. Fails to provide a rationale for the type(s) of analysis chosen. Statistical procedures are not consistent with the research questions, hypotheses, and type of data collected. Provides inadequate information about the chosen alpha level for each analysis, the assumption tests for each analysis, and the statistic that is planned to interpret the effect size. |
0 points Not present |
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Grammar, Usage, & Mechanics |
19 to 20 points
Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the assignment. There are 0-1 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. |
17 to 18 points
There are occasional errors in grammar or spelling. There are 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. |
1 to 16 points
There are 3-4 errors per section in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. |
0 points Not present |
|
APA Format |
35 to 37 points
APA format is used in each section. There are 0-1 errors in APA style and tone and 0-1 errors in the reference list. |
32 to 34 points
APA format is used in most sections. There are 1-2 errors in APA style and tone and 1-2 errors in the reference list. |
APA format is lacking in most sections. There are 3-4 errors in APA style and tone and 3-4 errors in the reference list. |
0 points Not present |
Page 3 of 3