Finance Ethics case
Source: Going Green: Can Automakers invest in Environmental Solutions? Case financial data from annual reports, SEC 10-K, Yahoo Finance, NASDAQ, Bloomberg Terminal, or other sources.
Assignment: As an analyst at a Policy Think Tank (choose one between – Brookings Institute, Center for
American Progress, Rand Corporation, or Heritage Foundation), you must write a research article on
whether US automobile makers should tackle climate change issues. For the article you must conduct
analysis about the impact to Global Warning and Greenhouse gases that the Big Three US automobile
manufacturers contribute and whether they should seek to mitigate. Your analysis must consider the pros
and cons of Electrical Vehicle (EV) manufacturing and make recommendations about whether your
assigned company should reduce, continue or expand production of EVs in place of fossil-fuel powered
vehicles. The impetus for this article is to summarize how EV production by US automobile
manufacturers impact climate change and to publish an article on whether the EV production by US
manufacturers should be continued at same levels, expanded, or reduced. The period of study is from
2010 to present.
ARTICLE MUST INCLUDE (narrative of your analysis with supporting tables, charts and graphs, as appropriate). The article must be no more than 3 pages. The Excel spreadsheet of your computations, stock price analysis, and other work must be submitted as a separate file. There should be only two files submitted (article and Excel worksheet).
(1) The Problem: Provide a brief overview about global warming, climate change, and the Paris Climate
Agreement. Discuss how the US compares to other countries in addressing this issue. Outline why
your selected Think Tank’s knowledge/experience relates to addressing social problems like Climate
Change policy.
(2) Impact to Stakeholders. Before and After the Paris Agreement (2010 – present) for the Big Three
Detroit Auto Manufacturers (Ford, GM, and Stallantis), conduct analysis of how the following
stakeholders may benefit or be harmed from the production of EV vehicles (Answer Q1 from the
source case).
a. Employees,
b. Communities (environment),
c. Consumers, and
d. Stockholders.
(3) Future Focus of US Automakers. After the Paris Agreement (2015), discuss whether US production of
EVs has changed and what impact the US makes to the global climate change issue, especially
focusing on US light truck production (Answer Q2 from the source case).
(4) Evaluation. Based on your analysis that considers the pros and cons of Electrical Vehicle (EV)
manufacturing and its advantages and disadvantages to stakeholders, make recommendations
about whether your assigned company should reduce, continue or expand production of EVs in
place of fossil-fuel powered vehicles.
Article Format. Submit one Microsoft Word file or Adobe (*.pdf) file with all tables, graphs, figures
embedded:
Title page with your name, selected Think Tank, and article title.
All the sections must be properly labelled using the sections listed above.
All required sections must be included.
The article must be written for the target audience and be free of typographical and grammatical
errors.
Include page numbers.
Consistent font size and type. At least 12 font for text and 11 font for graphs and charts.
Title page and references are not included in the page count.
Include references, as appropriate.
Submit article and Excel file via Canvas before 11:50pm on the due date.
1 | P a g e
FIN 620 Going Green Social Case