FIELD EXPERIENCE C
|
1 No Submission 0.00% |
2 Insufficient 69.00% |
3 Approaching 74.00% |
4 Acceptable 87.00% |
5 Target 100.00% |
||
|
100.0 %Criteria |
|
|||||
|
15.0 % Management Style |
Not addressed. |
Reflection does not discuss the teacher's management style. |
Reflection inadequately discusses the teacher's management style. |
Reflection clearly discusses the teacher's management style. |
Reflection skillfully and concisely describes the teacher's management style. |
|
|
15.0 % Expectations, Routines, and Procedures Introduced and Reinforced |
Not addressed. |
Reflection poorly explains how expectations, routines, and procedures are introduced and reinforced. |
Reflection minimally explains how expectations, routines, and procedures are introduced and reinforced. |
Reflection clearly explains how expectations, routines, and procedures are introduced and reinforced. |
Reflection thoroughly explains how expectations, routines, and procedures are introduced and reinforced. |
|
|
15.0 % Engagement Strategies |
Not addressed. |
Description of strategies used to engage the students is flawed. |
Reflection partially describes the strategies used to engage the students. |
Reflection reasonably describes the strategies used to engage the students. |
Reflection insightfully describes the strategies used to engage the students. |
|
|
15.0 % Behavioral Issues |
Not addressed. |
Implausibly describes how the teacher deals with and handles behavioral issues in the classroom. |
Vaguely describes how the teacher deals with and handles behavioral issues in the classroom. |
Soundly describes how the teacher deals with and handles behavioral issues in the classroom. |
Proficiently describes how the teacher deals with and handles behavioral issues in the classroom. |
|
|
10.0 % Classroom Physical Arrangement |
Not addressed. |
Reflection does not discuss how the classroom is physically set-up, and incidents of mutual respect. |
Reflection inadequately discusses how the classroom is physically set-up, and provides vague incidents of mutual respect. |
Reflection clearly discusses how the classroom is physically set-up, and provides detailed accounts of incidents of mutual respect. |
Reflection skillfully and concisely discusses how the classroom is physically set-up, and provides insightful incidents of mutual respect. |
|
|
10.0 % Organization |
Not addressed. |
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. |
The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. |
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. |
The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. |
|
|
20.0 % Mechanics (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Not addressed. |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. |
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and |
|