RC01
GEMENI80
Feedbck.docxRubric Name: RC001 Rubric v.2
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria
0 - Not Present
2000 points
1 - Needs Improvement
2000 points
2 - Meets Expectations
50 points
3 - Exceeds Expectations
1 point
Learning Objective 1.1: Define key principles and concepts.
Some or all definitions are not present.
Definitions are weak or illogical.
Definitions are succinct and accurate.
Demonstrates the same level as “2” plus the following:
Definitions provide context in the field of early childhood studies.
50 / 2000
Criterion Feedback
Just be more clear about generalizability - which is about being able to generalize your findings to a broader population.
Learning Objective 1.2: Explain the importance of the principles of high quality research.
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response lists fewer than three principles of high quality research.
Response provides weak or partial explanations of their importance.
Response clearly describes three principles of high quality research.
Response provides a thorough explanation of the importance of the identified principles.
Demonstrates the same level as “2” plus the following:
Response includes a thoughtful analysis of the importance of each principle in terms of early childhood research.
2000 / 2000
Criterion Feedback
You have ethical considerations here - it needs to be specific to what constitutes "high quality research" - it's in one of the readings provided (Mac Naughton, G., Rolfe, S. A., & Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2010). Doing early childhood research: International perspectives on theory and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill)
Learning Objective 1.3: Define informed consent and its application to research with children.
Response includes a thoughtful analysis of the importance of each principle in terms of early childhood research.
Response partially defines informed consent and/or its application to children.
Response accurately defines informed consent and its application to research with children.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response addresses the legal and ethical implications of informed consent.
50 / 2000
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe examples of ethical and unethical behaviors in research with children.
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response is incomplete or provides weak examples.
Response provides one relevant example of ethical and unethical behavior in research with children.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response provides more than one example of both ethical and unethical behavior in research with children.
50 / 2000
Learning Objective 2.1 Describe the characteristics of different types of sources of early childhood research studies.
Response is not present.
Response is incomplete.
Response correctly defines the type of source and provides the correct example.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response elaborates on the characteristics by describing the value of each type of source.
50 / 2000
Learning Objective 2.2 Describe high-quality sources of early childhood research studies.
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response is incomplete.
Response describes the type of research covered in two high-quality publications.
Response includes an explanation of the reasons the publications are consider high quality.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response describes more than two high-quality publications.
2000 / 2000
Criterion Feedback
See my announcement about this in RC001. These should be whole publications (rather than individual articles). In other words, evaluate the source from which these articles came, where they were published.
Learning Objective 3.1 Describe the main parts of a research article and the purpose of each part.
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response describes some of the parts of a research article.
Description includes a partial explanation of the purpose of each part of a research article.
Response accurately describes the five parts of a research article.
Description includes a clear explanation of the purpose of each part of a research article.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Description includes each of the four parts of the methods section.
50 / 2000
Learning Objective 4.1: Define reliability and validity within the context of early childhood research.
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response includes a partially-accurate definition of reliability and validity in the context of early childhood research.
Response includes an accurate definition of reliability and validity in the context of early childhood research.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response includes an example of reliable or valid test results cited in a peer-reviewed journal article.
50 / 2000
Learning Objective 4.2: Define types of validity and reliability.
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response is incomplete .
Response includes an accurate definition of each type of validity and reliability.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response includes an example of each type of validity from research articles.
50 / 2000
Learning Objective 5.1: Describe strategies for gathering data in research studies.
Response is not present or is inaccurate.
Response mentions data-gathering techniques but does not match them to the questions.
Response clearly describes one strategy for gathering data related to each research question presented.
Response includes a logical rationale.
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Response clearly describes more than one strategy for gathering data related to each research question presented.
2000 / 2000
Criterion Feedback
The second one is good, but you would not want to do focus groups with preschool children on this particular topic. What is another way you could go about collecting meaningful data for the first one?
Rubric Total ScoreTotal
6350 / 20000
Overall Score
Overall Score
0 - Not Present
1 - Needs Improvement
2 - Meets Expectations
3 - Exceeds Expectations
|
|
|
|
Score |
|
|
Not Yet Achieved |
|
|
Feedback Date |
|
|
May 19, 2020 10:59 PM |
|
Assignment |
|
|||||||
|
RC001 Assessment Submission (Attempt 1)
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
