Project part 4 help due in 2 days

Writes an introduction that provides context to the paper and presents main topics covered in the paper but this information is not presented in a thesis statement but throughout the first paragraph.

(2.8 - 3.1)

Criterion Feedback

Good overall, but lacks a single, strong, clear thesis statement.

Attempts to explain what control means in a business setting and why it is needed using little to no course materials or uses external source material;  or incorrect explains; needs major development.

(4.8 - 5.5) 

Criterion Feedback

Good content, but you used external sources.

Attempts to explain why Lacks Tracks Cycles needs to be concerned with the production metrics for the electric motorcycle using little to no course materials to support the reasoning; may use external source material;  incorrect response; needs major development. 

(9 - 10.4)

Criterion Feedback

You explain the reason for concern, but do not include course material as support. Where does the source (Mufutau, 2013) come from? It is not listed in your reference list.

Compares to a limited extent the metrics to actual performance for some of the plants or may not explain the results adequately from each branch; Discussion may be incorrect; needs significant major development. 

(9 - 10.4) 

Criterion Feedback

Your discussion is way too general--where are the specifics? Ex: "For Maryland Plant, total cost of manufacturer per unit, manufacturing cycle time, scrap rate, average production downtime, damages during shipping, safety incident per employee are higher..." How much higher? This part is incredibly important.

Correctly identifies four (4) common deviations from the standards among the plants but explanation as to why this data is important to management needs significant development or identifies at least three (3) of the  common deviations but   explains why this is significant in a manner that needs  development. 

(10.5 - 11.9)

Criterion Feedback

Complete lack of course support does not establish any credibility in this part.

Attempts to identify and explain controls that could be used by Lacks Tracks management to attempt to correct the deviations from production standards at the plants but fails to develop two (2) controls fully or does not use course materials or explanations need very significant development.

(3 - 3.4)

Criterion Feedback

No course support included, as required by the rubric.

Attempts to explain why the implementation of a Total Quality Management program could improve operational efficiency at Lacks Tracks.  Uses minimal or no course material; needs significant major development. 

(6 - 6.9) 

Criterion Feedback

No course support included, as required by the rubric.

Presents a conclusion but may be irrelevant to the main topics of the paper OR does not discuss the main findings of the paper. 

(1.8 - 2)

Criterion Feedback

You summarized the instructions for the assignment--not the findings of your paper.

One major assignment tasks or two minor elements of the assignment missed. . 

(7 - 7.9)

 

 

Criterion Feedback

Page/Paragraph numbers still missing from in-text citations

Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English using paragraphs and sentence rather than bullets, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No jargon used. Few writing errors noted.

(9 - 10)

Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; but 5 - 6 times style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 5-6 times.  Seldom uses APA.

(3 - 3.4)

 

 

Criterion Feedback

Without page/paragraph numbers, your in-text citations are irrelevant.