OM010 Health care Administration Masters Level

FEEDBACKOM010.docx

Home >Human Resource Management homework help >OM010 Health care Administration Masters Level

You're very close in on the right path, however you need to expand a few areas. See my comments on the markup and the rubric. Especially the timeline, you need to be more specific. Your cost estimate also was inaccurate and incomplete. I highly recommend you review the rubric thoroughly. In order to pass this paper, you would need a 3 on every section as explained in the rubric. Do more research into the cost estimates of electronic health record system implementation and include citation.

Learning Objective 1.1: Explain core functions of a healthcare information system.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response explains four core functions of the healthcare information system. Response accurately explains the impact of the core functions have on the organization.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 1.2: Explain legal and regulatory requirements for implementing the healthcare information system.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response identifies three legal and regulatory requirements to be considered when implementing the healthcare information system. Response explains the relevance of these requirements.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 1.3: Summarize the value of the healthcare information system to an organization.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response describes one value of the healthcare information system related to quality, outcomes, and safety. Response describes one value of the healthcare information system related to improved efficiency and cost reduction. Response describes one value of the healthcare information system related to improved service and satisfaction.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 1.4: Summarize functionality of the healthcare information system.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response describes three functions of the healthcare information system that are particularly relevant to the organization. Response provides rationale for highlighting these three functions to the organization.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 1.5: Evaluate the proposed healthcare information system against systems currently in place in an organization.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response accurately evaluates how the healthcare information system alignments with other organizations within a healthcare system.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 2.1: Analyze areas of concern in implementing the health information system.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response analyzes three areas of concern in implementing the health information system in the organization. Response provides rationale for highlighting each of these areas of concern.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 2.2: Analyze key points to consider in evaluation of the health information system.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response identifies three major points to consider in evaluating health information system once it is implemented. Response provides rationale for each point.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 3.1: Explain how the health information system is compatible to the organization’s mission, goals, and values.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response provides at least three clear ways the health information system is compatible to the organization’s mission, goals, and values.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 4.1: Evaluate core functions of the healthcare information system.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Fewer than six key core functions are identified. Explanation of the value and impact of the core functions to the organization is insufficient and/or inaccurate.
I'm not seeing a strong comparison here, you needed to compare your chosen system to a nether existing system and compare at least six core functions of each system. Do this in the paper and title it comparison of two different systems and explain the differences between the core functions of the two different systems. Make sure you list and describe at least six core functions

Learning Objective 4.2: Evaluate usability factors of the healthcare information system.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response identifies at least four usability factors that were addressed with the vendor. Response explains why these usability factors were selected for vendor discussion. Response explains the feedback received from the vendor on the usability factor queries.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 4.3: Recommend strategies for evaluating the healthcare information system usability.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response provides five strategies used for evaluating the healthcare information system usability in the organization. Response provides research-based rationale for each strategy. Response is supported by relevant academic/professional resources.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 4.4: Explain how the healthcare information system will integrate with other products.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response describes products within the organization that will integrate with the recommended healthcare information system.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 4.5: Explain how the healthcare information system ensures absolute privacy and security.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Response describes fewer than three safeguards.
Additional Comments: See my comments on the mark up for this one

Learning Objective 4.6: Describe the healthcare information system vendor support to an organization.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Response describes fewer than four areas of support provided by the vendor. Rationale is insufficient.
Additional Comments: See comments on mark up - you need to expand on this more it was too vague and general

Learning Objective 4.7: Evaluate vendor stability.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response provides data that indicates the vendor is stable and reliable. Response provides data addressing customer satisfaction. Response provides the names of three comparable organizations that implemented the healthcare information system from this vendor.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 4.8: Provide cost estimate of the healthcare information system.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Cost estimate is not in alignment with healthcare information system features and functions described.
Additional Comments: Additional Comments: See comments on mark up - you need to expand on this more it was too vague and general

Learning Objective 5.1 Develop a timeline for the selection and acquisition of a health information technology.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Timeline for the selection and acquisition of a health information system describes less than four steps in the system and how the steps would be accomplished.
Additional Comments: Additional Comments: See comments on mark up - you need to expand on this more it was too vague and general

Written Communication PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English. Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability.
Additional Comments:

Written Communication PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Writing is generally well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions provide continuity and a logical progression of ideas.
Additional Comments:

Written Communication PS 1.3: Apply APA style to written work.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are generally applied correctly in most instances. Sources are generally cited appropriately and accurately.
Additional Comments:

Written Communication PS 1.4: Use appropriate vocabulary and tone for the audience and purpose.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Vocabulary and tone are generally appropriate for the audience and support communication of key concepts.
Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking PS 5.1: Analyze assumptions and fallacies.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response generally assesses the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument. Response identifies and discusses the implications of fallacies and/or logical weaknesses in a given argument.
Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response presents and discusses key assumptions in an original argument.
Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking PS 5.3: Assess multiple perspectives and alternatives.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response identifies and considers multiple perspectives and alternatives.
Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking PS 5.4: Use problem-solving skills.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response presents solutions that are practical and work in addressing the specific problem.
Additional Comments:

Information Literacy PS 6.1: Identify credible sources.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Most sources are credible, appropriate, and relevant to the topic.
Additional Comments:

Information Literacy PS 6.2: Analyze findings from relevant sources.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Analysis clearly reflects relevance of findings to the identified problem, issue, or purpose.
Additional Comments: