|
Hi Elvis,
All corrections were not made from the First Rough Draft; therefore, again read over my feedback for the First Rough Draft as well as your Second Rough Draft; then, make All corrections, before submitting your Final Capstone paper by the due date. It is necessary to receive the passing grade desired. "I realize how important it is to you to pass the course this time around, as emphasized in your earlier post":
Feedback on SECOND ROUGH
DRAFTED ONLY 29 pages, required 30-40 pages, shorten running head/abreviateed them, reduce sources/References from 28 to the 24 sources/references approved for AB (students need to increase pages by one and use only the 24 approved sources), center All Major Heading on paper: Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Results, Discussion, List of References, the title need to be corrected to format of APPENDIX 1 of EOP as pointed out on First Rough Draft, add copyright page Appendix 2 as pointed out on First Rough Draft, Add Abstract Title page Appendix 5, as pointed out on First Rough Draft and correct reference to "integrating qualitative research, paper integrates quantitative research", add Subsections under Methodology and Results to TABLE OF CONTENT (see APPENDIX 6 of EOP) and develop these Subsections under their Section in the LTR of Document as pointed out in First Rough Draft, use Appendixes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of EOP regarding the pages to add and how to make corrections as pointed out in First Rough Draft, Final Paper will be read over (Final Capstone Document for further errors and corrections). Make adjustments and corrections, by or before submission of Final Capstone Paper/due date! Read over all feedback on First Rough Draft and Second Rough Draft; then, make all corrections by or before Submission of Final Capstone paper/due date.
Take care,
Dr. Gregory
Rubric Name: PSYC699 Week 13 Assignment Revised Draft Literature Review
Print Rubric
|
Introduction
|
Exemplary
|
Accomplished
|
Developing
|
Beginning
|
Did not attempt
|
Criterion Score
|
|
Statement of Problem
|
8 points
Detailed statement of the problem and why it is important to study.
|
6.8 points
Statement of the problem and why it is important to study. Some details are vague.
|
6 points
Statement of problem and why it is important to study. Needs clarification and elaboration.
|
5.2 points
Statement of problem and why it is important to study are included but incoherent.
|
0 points
No attempt to include statement of problem.
|
Score of Statement of Problem,
6.8 / 8
|
|
Context of Problem
|
8 points
Detailed examination of existing literature to establish background for study. Key terms and theories defined.
|
6.8 points
Examination of existing literature to establish background for study. Key terms and theories defined. Some details are vague.
|
6 points
Examination of existing literature to establish background for study. Key terms and theories defined. Needs clarification and elaboration.
|
5.2 points
Some examination of existing literature done in the field. Literature is not relevant to thesis. Key terms and theories are incoherent or irrelevant to thesis.
|
0 points
No attempt to include context of problem.
|
Score of Context of Problem,
6.8 / 8
|
|
Relevance to Field
|
8 points
Detailed description of how literature review contributes to field of psychology.
|
6.8 points
Description of how literature review contributes to field of psychology. Some details are vague.
|
6 points
Description of how literature review contributes to field of psychology. Needs clarification and elaboration.
|
5.2 points
Some description of how literature review contributes to field of psychology. Description is not relevant to thesis.
|
0 points
No attempt to include relevance to field.
|
Score of Relevance to Field,
6 / 8
|
|
Relevance to Student's Interests
|
8 points
Detailed description of how literature review contributes to student’s professional interests.
|
6.8 points
Description of how literature review contributes to student’s professional interests. Some details are vague.
|
6 points
Description of how literature review contributes to student’s professional interests. Needs clarification and elaboration.
|
5.2 points
Some description of how literature review contributes to student’s professional interests. Description is not relevant to thesis.
|
0 points
No attempt to include relevance to student’s professional interests.
|
Score of Relevance to Student's Interests,
6 / 8
|
|
Literature Review
|
Exemplary
|
Accomplished
|
Developing
|
Beginning
|
Did not attempt
|
Criterion Score
|
|
Literature Sampling Approach
|
8 points
Literature sampling approach and techniques are clearly articulated and can be reproduced.
|
6.8 points
Literature sampling approach and techniques are clearly articulated and can be reproduced.
|
6 points
Literature sampling approach and techniques are vague. Needs clarification and elaboration.
|
5.2 points
Some description of literature sampling approach and techniques. Description is insufficient to reproduce.
|
0 points
No attempt to explain literature sampling approach.
|
Score of Literature Sampling Approach,
6 / 8
|
|
Critical Analysis of Literature
|
12 points
Thorough summary of the general state of the literature (cumulative knowledge base) on the specific research question by synthesizing themes, methods, results, and/or theoretical frameworks used in current literature.
|
10.2 points
Summary of the general state of the literature (cumulative knowledge base) on the specific research question by synthesizing themes, methods, results, and/or theoretical frameworks used in current literature.
|
9 points
Summary of the general state of the literature (cumulative knowledge base) on the specific research question with some synthesis of themes, methods, results, and/or theoretical frameworks used in current literature. At times, analysis is incoherent and/or is not relevant to thesis.
|
7.8 points
Some description of the general state of the literature (cumulative knowledge base) on the specific research question. Themes, methods, results, and/or theoretical frameworks used in current literature are not addressed. Analysis is incoherent and/or is not relevant to thesis.
|
0 points
No attempt to analyze literature.
|
Score of Critical Analysis of Literature,
9 / 12
|
|
Summary
|
8 points
Succinct summary of each section before transitioning to the next section included.
|
6.8 points
Summary of each section before transitioning to the next section included. Some details are missing.
|
6 points
Summary of each section before transitioning to the next section included. Needs clarification and elaboration.
|
5.2 points
Summary of some sections before transitioning to the next section included. Summary is incoherent or not relevant to thesis.
|
0 points
No attempt to include a summary of each section before transitioning to the next section.
|
Score of Summary,
6 / 8
|
|
Discussion
|
Exemplary
|
Accomplished
|
Developing
|
Beginning
|
Did not attempt
|
Criterion Score
|
|
Main Themes & Findings
|
8 points
Clear identification of main themes. Detailed synthesis of conclusions from literature review to alter conceptualizations of existing paradigms or establish new paradigms.
|
6.8 points
Identification of main themes. Synthesis of conclusions from literature review to alter conceptualizations of existing paradigms or establish new paradigms. Some details are missing.
|
6 points
Some main themes identified. Synthesis of conclusions from literature review to alter conceptualizations of existing paradigms or establish new paradigms. Needs clarification and elaboration.
|
5.2 points
Few to no main themes identified. Incomplete or incoherent synthesis of conclusions from literature review to alter conceptualizations of existing paradigms or establish new paradigms.
|
0 points
No attempt to identify main themes. No synthesis of conclusion from literature review.
|
Score of Main Themes & Findings,
6 / 8
|
|
Contribution to Field
|
8 points
Detailed explanation of new knowledge gained through literature findings and how the findings contribute to field’s.
|
6.8 points
Explanation of new knowledge gained through literature findings and how the findings contribute to field’s understanding of the overall topic. Some details are missing.
|
6 points
Some explanation of new knowledge gained through literature findings and how the findings contribute to field’s understanding of the overall topic. Need for clarification and elaboration.
|
5.2 points
Minimal explanation of new knowledge gained through integration of literature findings and how the findings contribute to field’s understanding of the overall topic.
|
0 points
No attempt to explain new knowledge gained through literature findings and how the findings contribute to field’s understanding of the overall topic.
|
Score of Contribution to Field,
6 / 8
|
|
Implications for Future Research
|
8 points
Detailed, insightful recommendations for future research, with
supporting rationale.
|
6.8 points
Detailed recommendations for future research, with
supporting rationale.
|
6 points
Recommendations for future research, with some supporting rationale. Need for clarification and elaboration.
|
5.2 points
Some recommendations for future research. Recommendations are vague and lack supporting rationale.
|
0 points
No attempt to include recommendations for future research.
|
Score of Implications for Future Research,
6 / 8
|
|
Conclusion
|
8 points
Clear, succinct summary of entire paper and findings.
|
6.8 points
Clear summary of entire paper and findings.
|
6 points
Some summary of entire paper and findings. Need for clarification and elaboration.
|
5.2 points
Brief, vague summary of entire paper and findings.
|
0 points
No attempt to include summary of paper findings.
|
Score of Conclusion,
6 / 8
|
|
Writing/Formatting
|
Exemplary
|
Accomplished
|
Developing
|
Beginning
|
Did not attempt
|
Criterion Score
|
|
Writing/Formatting
|
8 points
Work is presented in a logical and coherent way and maintains an academic tone. Writing is clear, articulate, and error free. Citations are composed in proper format with few or no errors. Scholarly resources are used. APA formatting of Title Page, Abstract, Table of Contents, and References.
|
6.8 points
Work is grammatically sound with a few minor errors and maintains an academic tone. Citations are composed in proper format with some errors. Scholarly resources are used. APA formatting of Title Page, Abstract, Table of Contents, and References.
|
6 points
Work contains frequent grammatical errors. At times, work does not maintain an academic tone. Citations are inaccurate or improperly formatted. Some scholarly resources are used. Minor errors in APA formatting of Title Page, Abstract, Table of Contents, and References.
|
5.2 points
Work does not demonstrate appropriate graduate level writing. Work does not maintain an academic tone. Citations are inaccurate or improperly formatted. Scholarly resources are not used. Errors in APA formatting of Title Page, Abstract, Table of Contents, and References.
|
0 points
No attempt to cite information or format in APA style. Scholarly resources not used.
|
Score of Writing/Formatting,
6 / 8
|
Total
Score of PSYC699 Week 13 Assignment Revised Draft Literature Review,
76.6 / 100
Overall Score
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
|
|
|
|
Score
|
|
|
45.96 / 60 - 76.6 %
|
|
Feedback Date
|
|
|
Aug 3, 2022 12:45 PM
|
|
Assignment
|
|
|
Week 13 Assignment -Revised Draft
|
|
|
|
|
Bottom of Form
Done
|
|
deefer
FeedbackforWeek13Assignment.docx
