RC5

Feedback for RC005 Assessment Submission (Attempt 1)

Top of Form

Submission Feedback
Overall Feedback
This is a good proposal, Malodree. However, I am only seeing a PowerPoint presentation for Part 2 and you needed to submit a video. You can use a .mov or mp4 format or you can create it on YouTube (private) and provide the link. It should be at least 3 minutes, no more than 5. Make sure you clearly describe your methods (e.g., what kinds of questions you will ask of parents, teachers, etc. and what kinds of observations and interviews you will do).

Rubric Name: RC005 Rubric v.2

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

0 - Not Present

1 - Needs Improvement

2 - Meets Expectations

3 - Exceeds Expectations

Learning Objective 1.1: Develop a research question that is based on a relevant early childhood topic.

2-Research question is focused and relevant to the early childhood field.

Learning Objective 1.2: Analyze gaps in research literature to inform research questions.

2-Introduction provides a logical justification for the research question, based on a synthesis of the research literature.

Learning Objective 2.1: Apply skills for choosing relevant and reliable sources that inform a research question.

2-Sources included in the literature review are generally relevant to the question and are mostly drawn from peer-reviewed publications.

Learning Objective 2.2: Synthesize findings from the literature related to a research topic.

2-Synthesis of findings from the literature provides a general analysis of the scholarly landscape in which the research question is situated.

Literature review provides a logical explanation of the implications of the research to the research question.

Learning Objective 3.1: Justify the use of a specific research methodology in the design of a research proposal (i.e., qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods).

2-Justification for the research method is clear and logical and connects the chosen methodology to the research question.

Learning Objective 3.2: Describe specific methods of data gathering to be used in a research study.

2-Specific method(s) of gathering data is/are described clearly, in detail, and are supported by a logical rationale.

Learning Objective 3.3: Explain the processes for identifying research participants for a proposed study

2-A process for identifying research participants is clearly explained.

Response includes anticipated number of participants and how they will be selected.

Response clearly identifies potential sampling issues/challenges.

Learning Objective 3.4: Describe data collection methods.

Description is missing.

2-Response provides a clear description of the data collection methods and a logical rationale.

Learning Objective 3.5 Describe ethical issues related to research studies.

2-Description of ethical issues is clear, accurate, and generally relevant to the proposal.

Learning Objective 3.6: Describe benefits, limitations, and challenges to research studies.

2-Response clearly describes the benefits, limitations, and challenges to the research study.

Written Communication PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics.

2-Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English.

Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability.

PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity.

2-Writing is generally well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions provide continuity and a logical progression of ideas.

Written Communication PS 1.3: Support writing with appropriate resources.

2-Writing sufficiently integrates appropriate resources (which may include peer-reviewed resources) and content in support of ideas and argument.

Written Communication PS 1.4: Apply APA style to written work

2-APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are generally applied correctly in most instances. Sources are generally cited appropriately and accurately.

Written Communication PS 1.5: Use appropriate vocabulary and tone for the audience and purpose.

2-Vocabulary and tone are generally appropriate for the audience and support communication of key concepts.

Information Literacy PS 6.1: Identify credible sources.

2-Most sources are credible, appropriate, and relevant to the topic.

Information Literacy PS 6.2: Analyze findings from relevant sources.

2-Analysis clearly reflects relevance of findings to the identified problem, issue, or purpose.

Learning Objective 4.1: Explain how research in early childhood can contribute to the field and to positive social change.

0-Explanation is missing.

Oral Communication PS 2.1: Use clear enunciation, correct pronunciation, comfortable pacing, and appropriate volume.

0-Presenter mumbles or speaks in a monotone, mispronounces words, and/or struggles to find appropriate pacing or volume.

Oral Communication PS 2.2: Organize information to be presented.

0-Information is disorganized to a degree that impedes audience understanding.

Overall Score

Overall Score

0 - Not Present

1 - Needs Improvement

2 - Meets Expectations

3 - Exceeds Expectations

Score
Not Yet Achieved
Feedback Date
Dec 1, 2020 9:07 PM

Assignment
RC005 Assessment Submission (Attempt 1)

Bottom of Form