FeedbackforPV001AssessmentSubmission.docx

Feedback for PV001 Assessment Submission (Attempt 1)

· Add to ePortfolio

Top of Form

Submission Feedback

Thanks for your hard work, Malodree—I enjoyed your assessment--there are just a few items that require extension. Please see my feedback on the rubric and let me know if you have questions. Please be sure to make all of your revisions in red, and let me know when you are ready to resubmit. Thanks and have a good day!

Rubric Name: PV001 Rubric v.2

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

0 - Not Present

1 - Needs Improvement

2 - Meets Expectations

3 - Exceeds Expectations

Learning Objective 1.1: Describe the contribution of prominent researchers, early childhood professionals, and advocates to the early childhood field.

Description is missing.

Response vaguely or incompletely describes the key contributions of each individual.

Response accurately describes the key contributions of each individual.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response describes the contributions of an additional individual to the early childhood field.

Criterion Feedback

You have good information. Please note that in-text citations need to be applied at the sentence level as opposed to at the end of each paragraph. Please be sure to use the provided template.

Learning Objective 2.1: Describe the impact of significant events and research in the history of the early childhood field.

Description is missing.

Response vaguely or incompletely describes the impact of each event and/or research on the early childhood field.

Response accurately describes the impact of each event and/or research on the early childhood field.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response describes an additional significant event and/or research and its impact on the early childhood field.

Criterion Feedback

I appreciate your overview. In-text citations need to be provided for all statements that are not common knowledge. You are missing these citations (note comment above that these need to be applied at the sentence level. Please see the following for additional information: https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/72734

Learning Objective 3.1: Describe early childhood professional organizations and their purposes.

Description is missing.

Response incompletely or vaguely describes three or fewer early childhood organizations.

Response includes a partial or inappropriate citation for each organization.

Response describes three relevant and appropriate early childhood organizations and their purposes.

Response includes a citation for each organization.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response describes more than three relevant and appropriate early childhood organizations.

Criterion Feedback

Appreciate your overview. Please note that I the directions require that citations be provided for each organization.

Learning Objective 4.1: Describe early childhood research and advocacy organizations and their purposes.

Description is missing.

Response is vague or irrelevant.

Citation is missing or incomplete.

Response describes one relevant early childhood research and advocacy organization.

Response includes a citation for the organization identified.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response describes more than one relevant and appropriate early childhood research and advocacy organization.

Criterion Feedback

You have good information. Please be sure to provide a citation for each organization.

Learning Objective 5.1: Describe the main focus of peer-reviewed publications that inform early childhood practice and expand the professional knowledge base.

Description is missing.

Response describes irrelevant publications or is incomplete.

APA citations are missing or incomplete.

Response thoroughly describes the focus of two relevant and appropriate peer-reviewed publications that inform early childhood practice and expand the professional knowledge base.

APA citations are mostly accurate.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response identifies more than two relevant and appropriate peer-reviewed publication.

Criterion Feedback

Please specify each of the organizations that you are referring to in the context of your response. Note that you should utilize APA formatting to both present to each of the journal articles as well as their citation. Your first and third reference to articles is only missing the article title--in your second article please specify authors and article title.

Overall Score

Overall Score

0 - Not Present

1 - Needs Improvement

2 - Meets Expectations

3 - Exceeds Expectations

Score

Not Yet Achieved

Feedback Date