10 pages essay for ATH 301 course
Racial Discrimination in an Intercultural Community: Haochuan Tang, Bohao Cui, Hyejoo Lee
Summary:How racial discrimination has an affect in a community. Racially charged actions can affect education, opportunities, and others political affiliations. Profiling and prejudices can stem from stereotypes and the majority group creating a hierarchy.
Things I liked: I think by creating sections for the paper allowed it to flow better. It allowed the reading to know exactly what they are going to be reading. Since you broke the paper into sections maybe add exactly what ethnic groups you will be discussing in the paper so it gives the reader more of a sense of what groups you will be talking about further along. Tell us who the discriminators are and who the discriminated are.
Constructive Criticism: Be careful to simple typos. There were some small mechanical errors throughout the paper that needs to be fixed. Make sure not to repeat the same descriptive words in the same sentence. I’ve noticed throughout the paper “it should be noted” has been used a lot. Also, make sure the transition between sections flow well. Even though sections are broken into different parts, it still needs to be one concise paper. By aware of run on sentences as well. I saw a couple throughout the paper.
Grade: 80/100 – I found that there were multiple mechanical errors throughout the paper. The paper was clear, however I think if you were to talk about a specific group of people it would strengthen the paper. As of right now, the paper of too broad. Make it more specific and you will be good to go. Also, try not to use the exact same wording Dr. Peterson used for your section titles.
Racial
Discrimination
in
an
Intercultural
Community:
Haochuan
Tang,
Bohao
Cui,
Hyejoo
Lee
Summary:
How
racial
discrimination
has
an
affect
in
a
community.
Racially
charged
actions
can
affect
education,
opportunities,
and
others
political
affiliations.
Profiling
and
prejudices
can
stem
from
stereotypes
and
the
majority
group
creating
a
hierarchy.
Things
I
liked:
I
think
by
creating
sections
for
the
paper
allowed
it
to
flow
better.
It
allowed
the
reading
to
know
exactly
what
they
are
going
to
be
reading.
Since
you
broke
the
paper
into
sections
maybe
add
exactly
what
ethnic
groups
you
will
be
discussing
in
the
paper
so
it
gives
the
reader
more
of
a
sense
of
what
groups
you
will
be
talking
about
further
along.
Tell
us
who
the
discriminators
are
and
who
the
discriminated
are.
Constructive
Criticism:
Be
careful
to
simple
typos.
There
were
some
small
mechanical
errors
throughout
the
paper
that
needs
to
be
fixed.
Make
sure
not
to
repeat
the
same
descriptive
words
in
the
same
sentence.
I
’
ve
noticed
throughout
the
paper
“
it
should
be
noted
”
has
been
used
a
lot.
Also,
make
sure
the
transition
between
sections
flow
well.
Even
though
sections
are
broken
into
different
parts,
it
still
needs
to
be
one
concise
paper.
By
aware
of
run
on
sentences
as
well.
I
saw
a
couple
throughout
the
paper.
Grade:
80/100
–
I
found
that
there
were
multiple
mechanical
errors
throughout
the
paper.
The
paper
was
clear,
however
I
think
if
you
were
to
talk
about
a
specific
group
of
people
it
would
strengthen
the
paper.
As
of
right
now,
the
paper
of
too
broad.
Make
it
more
specific
and
you
will
be
good
to
go.
Also,
try
not
to
use
the
exact
same
wording
Dr.
Peterson
used
for
your
section
titles.