OM009APA INTEXT CITATION AND REFERENCE REQUIRED _ PLEASE REVIEW RUBRIC THOROUGHLY

FEEDBACKFOROM009.docx

Home >Human Resource Management homework help >OM009APA INTEXT CITATION AND REFERENCE REQUIRED _ PLEASE REVIEW RUBRIC THOROUGHLY

FEEDBACK FOR OM009

This is a good start; however, there are still multiple sections that need to be improved. Once you are ready, please let me know so I can unlock your next attempt. Please make sure that you carefully read the rubric prior to making the changes. I also highly recommend that you organize your slides based on the rubric. In order to pass this paper, you would need a 3 on every section as explained in the rubric. Learning Objective 1.1: Define evidence-based decision making.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Presentation accurately and thoroughly defines evidence-based decision making.

Definition is supported by relevant academic/professional resources.

Additional Comments: Provide an example of a specific facility that used evidence-based decision making. Also, ensure that you use academic references to support your example.

Learning Objective 1.2: Explain the relevance of evidence-based decision making in the healthcare industry.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Presentation accurately and thoroughly explains the relevance of evidence-based decision making in the healthcare industry. Explanation is supported by relevant academic/professional resources.
Additional Comments: Provide an example of a facility or organization

Learning Objective 2.1: Apply evidence-based decision making to define a problem.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Presentation clearly defines the problem that applies evidence-based decision making.
Additional Comments: Provide the most compelling evidence and references

Learning Objective 2.2: Recommend options based on data.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Presentation provides one logical option for no additional beds and two logical options for additional beds. Presenter notes include detailed empirical support from the facts given in the case study and evidence from relevant academic/professional resources.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 2.3: Describe how recommendations address specific issues in healthcare ICUs.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Presentation thoroughly describes how three options will address the issues in the ICU. Presenter notes include detailed empirical support from the facts given in the case study and evidence from the relevant academic/professional resources.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 2.4: Develop evidence-based recommendations that maximize benefits to hospitals, patients, and the community.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Evidence-based final recommendation is illogical and/or vaguely explains how the final recommendation will maximize benefits to the hospital, the patients, and the community is incomplete.
Additional Comments: It is unclear to me which one is your final recommendation

Learning Objective 2.5: Justify evidence-based recommendations.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Presentation provides an illogical or unsubstantiated justification for the final recommendation. Justification is not supported by academic/professional resources or the resources are not relevant.
Additional Comments: Again, have a slide that specifically mentions that it is your final recommendation.

Learning Objective 2.6 Compare data over time to support recommendations.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Graphic comparison between the current state of the ICU versus the remote monitoring ICU implementation in 5 years is inaccurate or unclear.
Additional Comments: Your graphs only show additional beds. This requires current ICU vs. remote monitoring

Learning Objective 2.7: Explain the impact of recommendations on staffing, productivity, competitiveness, and finances.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Presentation provides an illogical explanation of the impact of the recommendation on staffing, productivity, competitiveness, or finances, or Explanation is inaccurate. Explanation excludes the appropriate qualitative or quantitative data used in the analysis, or the qualitative and quantitative data is included inaccurately or inappropriately in the analysis.
Additional Comments: Be clear on your final recommendation and then provide the impact of the recommendation on staffing, productivity, competitiveness, or finances.

Learning Objective 3.1: Summarize evidence used in developing an opportunity statement and recommendation.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Summary is verbose or the summary is unclear or inaccurate.
Additional Comments: Your presentation is missing a summary slide

Learning Objective 3.2: Summarize the analysis used to create the recommendations.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Summary of the analysis used to create the recommendation is incomplete or inaccurate.
Additional Comments: Create one summary slide with your analysis and recommendation

Learning Objective 3.3: Evaluate the validity and reliability of data.:

NOT PRESENT
0	Evaluation of the validity and reliability of data is missing.
Additional Comments: This section is missing.

Written Communication: PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English. Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability.
Additional Comments:

Written Communication: PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Writing is generally well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions provide continuity and a logical progression of ideas.
Additional Comments:

Written Communication: PS 1.3: Apply APA style to written work.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are generally applied correctly in most instances. Sources are generally cited appropriately and accurately.
Additional Comments:

Written Communication: PS 1.4: Use appropriate vocabulary and tone for the audience and purpose.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Vocabulary and tone are consistently tailored to the audience and effectively and directly support communication of key concepts.
Additional Comments:

Technology: PS 3.1: Use images and layout of presentations to effectively communicate content to a specific audience.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Images and layout generally support audience understanding of key concepts.
Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: PS 5.1: Analyze assumptions and fallacies.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Response is weak in assessing the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument. Response does not adequately identify and discuss the implications of fallacies or logical weaknesses in a given argument.
Additional Comments: Once you address the comments in the previous section, this should also address this section.

Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response presents and discusses key assumptions in an original argument.
Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: PS 5.3: Assess multiple perspectives and alternatives.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response identifies and considers multiple perspectives and alternatives.
Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: PS 5.4: Use problem-solving skills.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Response presents solutions, but they are ineffective in addressing the specific problem.
Additional Comments: This will also be addressed once you address the earlier sections.