Reflection Report: Best Practice of BPI case study

profilerupali
Feedbackformweek8Sujan.docx

PROJ6009 T1, 2020 Assessment 2A Marking And Feedback Form

Presenter / Group: DALJEET AND RUPALI KAUR Date: 08/05/2020

Category Scoring Criteria Points Score

Organisation (15 points)

The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience. 5 4

Information is presented in a logical sequence. 5 4

Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references. 5 4

Content (50 points)

Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation. 5 4

Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience, eg mapping, processes etc 10 6

Material included is relevant to the case study and reflect to the BPI theories 15 11

Critical analysis included on the selected case study, lesson learnt recorded 15 11

There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation. 5 3.5

Presentation (35 points)

Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.). 5 5

Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth. 10 3.5

Good language skills and pronunciation are used. 5 4

Visual aids are well-prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting. 10 7

Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits. 5 2

Total Points 100 69

Feedback and Commentary

GROUP2(SUJAN AND TEAM)

Assessor Name/Group:

PROJ6009 T1, 2020 Assessment 2A Marking And Feedback Form

Presenter / Group: DALJEET AND RUPALI KAUR Date: 08/05/2020

Category Scoring Criteria Points Score

Organisation

(15 points)

The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience. 5 4

Information is presented in a logical sequence. 5 4

Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references. 5 4

Content

(50 points)

Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a

framework for the rest of the presentation.

5 4

Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target

audience, eg mapping, processes etc

10 6

Material included is relevant to the case study and reflect to the BPI theories 15 11

Critical analysis included on the selected case study, lesson learnt recorded 15 11

There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation. 5 3.5

Presentation

(35 points)

Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately

animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).

5 5

Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. Delivery is poised, controlled, and

smooth.

10 3.5

Good language skills and pronunciation are used. 5 4

Visual aids are well-prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting. 10 7

Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits. 5 2

Total Points 100 69

Feedback and

Commentary

GROUP2(SUJAN AND TEAM)

Assessor Name/Group:

PROJ6009 T1, 2020 Assessment 2A Marking And Feedback Form

Presenter / Group: DALJEET AND RUPALI KAUR Date: 08/05/2020

Category

Scoring Criteria

Points

Score

Organisation

(15 points)

The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience.

5

4

Information is presented in a logical sequence.

5

4

Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references.

5

4

Content

(50 points)

Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation.

5

4

Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience, eg mapping, processes etc

10

6

Material included is relevant to the case study and reflect to the BPI theories

15

11

Critical analysis included on the selected case study, lesson learnt recorded

15

11

There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation.

5

3.5

Presentation

(35 points)

Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).

5

5

Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth.

10

3.5

Good language skills and pronunciation are used.

5

4

Visual aids are well-prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting.

10

7

Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits.

5

2

Total Points

100

69

Feedback and Commentary

GROUP2(SUJAN AND TEAM)

Assessor Name/Group: