Question

OL 620 Milestone Two Rubric Activity: 5-1 Final Project Milestone Two: Benefits and Compensation Analysis (Section I, Parts D-F)

Course: OL-620-X4179 Total Rewards 22TW4

Name: Deyanira Diaz

Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Total Rewards

Analysis:

Misalignment,

Differences, and

Gaps

24 / 30

Criterion Feedback

Total Rewards

Analysis:

Increased,

Reduced or Stay

the Same

24 / 30

30 points

Determines areas

of misalignment,

differences, and

gaps present in

the current

benefits and

compensation

system, based on

the external

benchmarking

data

24 points

Determines areas

of misalignment,

differences, and

gaps present in

the current

benefits and

compensation

system, but

determination is

cursory or

illogical

0 points

Does not

determine areas

of misalignment,

differences, and

gaps present in

the current

benefits and

compensation

system

Areas you COULD have determined to be misaligned, different, or having gaps between

Emerging Pharma’ and Medtronic’s taken from the focus group feedback (qualitative data) as

those that were of importance: Work Life Balance, Tuition Reimbursement, Paid Time Off, Sick

Leave, 401K contributions, HSA Option to medical plan, Remote work assignments, lifestyle

rewards, and Wage Gap.

30 points

Determines

rewards

components that

should be

increased,

reduced or stay

the same,

providing

appropriate

rationale

24 points

Determines

rewards

components that

should be

increased,

reduced or stay

the same, but

rationale is

cursory, illogical,

or there are gaps

0 points

Does not

determine

rewards

components that

should be

increased,

reduced or stay

the same

Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Criterion Feedback

Total Rewards

Analysis:

Population

Affected

24 / 30

Criterion Feedback

Potential issues or concerns that COULD be targeted and recognized from those rewards

components that should be increased, reduced or left alone: Tuition Reimbursement increased

(wait period dropped), Increase Pay, Remote Work, Professional & Job Development, PTO,

401K & OSHA.

30 points

Compares

qualitative input

data and

quantitative

analysis with the

organization’s

employee

demographic data

to determine the

degree of the

existing

population that

will be affected

by the proposed

changes

24 points

Compares

qualitative input

data and

quantitative

analysis with the

organization’s

employee

demographic data

to determine the

degree of the

existing

population that

will be affected

by the proposed

changes, but

analysis or is

cursory or

illogical, or there

are gaps in

determination

0 points

Does not compare

qualitative input

data and

quantitative

analysis with the

organization’s

employee

demographic data

No Analysis of the qualitative & quantitative data with employee demographics...Must have for

final for final roll-up paper.

Total 80 / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Articulation of

Response

8 / 10

Criterion Feedback

10 points

Submission has

no major errors

related to

citations,

grammar, spelling,

syntax, or

organization

8 points

Submission has

major errors

related to

citations,

grammar,

spelling, syntax,

or organization

that negatively

impact readability

and articulation

of main ideas

0 points

Submission has

critical errors

related to

citations,

grammar, spelling,

syntax, or

organization that

prevent

understanding of

ideas

I emailed you the references for this case study. Please use them and cite that information.

Points earned out of 100 Points earned out of 100 Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 81

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the gradebook.

The overall submission earned 1

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the gradebook.

The overall submission earned 0

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the gradebook.