ee
aakoto
FeedbackCaseStudyMr.MWk2.docxFeedback Case Study: Mr. M. - Rubric
Expand All Case Study: Mr. M. -
Expand Clinical Manifestations of Mr. M. assessment
Clinical Manifestations of Mr. M.
9.48 / 12
Criteria Comments
Provide all labs all diagnostics and all VS here
Expand Diagnoses and Secondary Diagnoses assessment
Diagnoses and Secondary Diagnoses
9.48 / 12
Criteria Comments
Incorrect diagnosis
Expand Explanation of Expected Abnormalities During Nursing Assessment
Explanation of Expected Abnormalities During Nursing Assessment
14.22 / 18
Approaching
Criteria Comments
Minimal data presented
Expand Interventions for Support assessment
Interventions for Support
16.02 / 18
Acceptable
16.02 points
Discussion of interventions that can be put into place to support the patient and his family is detailed.
Criteria Comments
Be more specific and use EBP research to back up your data
Expand Actual or Potential Problems Based on Condition assessment
Actual or Potential Problems Based on Condition
16.02 / 18
Criteria Comments
Provide more data here
Expand Thesis, Position, or Purpose assessment
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
4.74 / 6
Approaching
Criteria Comments
I used part of the first paragraph for this area but normally it will be a statement regarding what you will discuss in the paper that is separate from all other data
Expand Development, Structure, and Conclusion assessment
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
4.5 / 6
Criteria Comments
No conclusion offered
Expand Evidence assessment
Evidence
4.74 / 6
Criteria Comments
The more specific EBP research data the better the evidence
Expand Mechanics of Writing assessment
Mechanics of Writing
3.6 / 3.6
Criteria Comments
No comments.
Expand Format/Documentation assessment
Format/Documentation
Target
2.4 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
Criteria Comments
No comments.
