CAPSTONE

FEEDBACKCAPSTONE12202018.docx

Home >Applied Sciences homework help >CAPSTONE

Submission Feedback

Funmi, thanks for this submission. Unfortunately, most of the issues identified by Dr. Mast during the first evaluation remain. Because you did not re-submit your PowerPoint presentation, I was unable to reassess those areas of the submission - for your next submission, please make sure your submit your corrected presentation. The major issue in your assessment is your incorrect financial analysis - you portray a profitable, going concern in your analysis, when the data reflects something very different. I encourage you to think through your analysis very carefully and review the financial data submitted with the case; use this data and only this data in performing your analysis. I have also pointed out numerous writing issues in your paper - please address all of these for your next submission. The next submission will be your third and final attempt at this competency. Take your time and review and address all my feedback before resubmission. If you have questions regarding any of my feedback - please do not hesitate to contact me for clarification. I would be happy to schedule a call with you if that would help. Because this is your final attempt, I would like to review a draft of your assessment as your SME, before you re-submit to make sure everything has been addressed. Thanks, Dr. Steve

Learning Objective LO 1.1: Create alignment between the goals of the community center and the goals of the PPACA, HP2020 and IOM.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Executive summary clearly and accurately explains how the goals of the Center for Diabetes Care align with the goals of the PPACA Community Health Center Fund, Healthy People 2020, and IOM aims for quality care. Response references relevant academic/professional resources.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective LO 1.2: Explanation ofstakeholder perspectives that support business recommendations.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Executive summary clearly explains internal and external stakeholder perspectives that support the business recommendation presented in the case.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective1.3: Explain how the business recommendation fits within the continuum of care.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Executive summary clearly and accurately explains how the recommendation presented in the case fits within the continuum of care of the healthcare organization presented in the case.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 2.1: Create vision and mission statements.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Vision and mission statements reflect accrediting bodies’ benchmarks for quality healthcare.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 2.2: Create a value statement.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Value statement aligns with accrediting bodies’ benchmarks for quality healthcare.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 2.3: Conduct a SWOT analysis.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

SWOT analysis does not include at least four of the greatest strengths, four of the greatest weaknesses, four of the greatest opportunities, and four of the greatest threats for the development of the initiative recommended in the case presented. Content of the SWOT analysis is vague, inaccurate, or not concise. Analysis does not take into consideration the information and perspectives from all documentation provided with the case.

Additional Comments:

Your analysis does not include include at least four of the greatest weaknesses of the initiative recommended in the case presented.

Additionally, your analysis does not take into consideration all the information and perspectives from all documentation provided with the case. Specifically, you have not discussed the impact funding will have on the sustainability of this venture.

Learning Objective 2.4: Develop strategies for launching and operationalizing a healthcare initiative.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Response clearly and concisely describes at least four strategies for launching and operationalizing the initiative recommended in the case presented. Strategies align with the results of the SWOT analysis.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 2.5: Develop goals for a healthcare initiative.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Response describes fewer than four short-term goals and/or fewer than four measurable long-term goals for the initiative recommended in the case presented, and/or the goals are not measurable, and/or they do not align with the mission, vision, and values statements.
Additional Comments:Your response describes fewer than four measurable long-term goals for the initiative recommended in the case presented, and some the goals are not measurable; at least it is not clear how they would be measured. Please expand your response by adding at least two long range goals and make clear how each goal will be measured.

Learning Objective3.1: Develop a timeline for implementing key activities.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Timeline identifies responsible parties for each item.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 3.2: Analyze financial data.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Analysis of the expected patient-generated revenue, grant funding, non-staff costs, staffing costs, and capital costs for the initiative presented in the case. Chart summarizing the financial data is confusing, vague, inaccurate, or incomplete.

Additional Comments:

Your analysis of the expected patient-generated

revenue, grant funding, non-staff costs, staffing costs, and capital costs for the initiative presented in the case is incorrect. It appears you have not used the correct data for your analysis.

The chart summarizing the financial data are confusing and inaccurate. Please re-accomplish this part of your assessment using the correct data.

Learning Objective 4.1: Defend how the recommended healthcare initiative addresses unmet needs.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Defense of the recommended initiative does not address unmet needs, or the defense is weak or vague, or is not relevant to the initiative in the case presented. Explanation does not reference relevant information provided in the needs-assessment documentation presented in the case.
Additional Comments: Funmi, because you did not re-submit your presentation as required, I was unable to evaluate this objective, so the score remains from your initial submission. Please address the issues identified by myself and Dr. Mast on your first two attempts and re-submit your presentation for evaluation on your third attempt.

Learning Objective 4.2: Explain how a healthcare initiative can help promote positive social change.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	The presentation clearly explains three ways in which the initiative recommended in the case presented can help promote positive social change. The presentation explains the connections between the positive health outcomes related to the case, and positive social change.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 4.3: Create a culturally competent healthcare initiative.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	The presentation provides a clear explanation of how the healthcare initiative in the case presented would be structured to ensure cultural competency with the patient population. Explanation considers human resources, programs, community outreach, and involvement with internal and external stakeholders.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective 4.4: Explain how a healthcare initiative can become financially self-sustaining.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Explanation of how the healthcare initiative in the case presented can become financially self-sustaining within three years of opening is vague, inaccurate, or incomplete.
Additional Comments:Funmi, because you did not re-submit your presentation as required, I was unable to evaluate this objective, so the score remains from your initial submission. Please address the issues identified by myself and Dr. Mast on your first two attempts and re-submit your presentation for evaluation on your third attempt.

Learning Objective 4.5: Explain how the success of a healthcare initiative can be measured.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Explanation of how the success of the healthcare initiative in the case presented can be measured is vague or both qualitative and quantitative methods are not explained. Methods of measurement are not appropriate for the initiative in the case presented.
Additional Comments:Funmi, because you did not re-submit your presentation as required, I was unable to evaluate this objective, so the score remains from your initial submission. Please address the issues identified by myself and Dr. Mast on your first two attempts and re-submit your presentation for evaluation on your third attempt.

Oral Communication PS 2.1: Use clear enunciation, correct pronunciation, comfortable pacing, and appropriate volume.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Presenter enhances audience engagement through consistently clear enunciation, correct pronunciation, comfortable pacing, and appropriate volume.
Additional Comments:

Oral Communication PS 2.2: Organize information to be presented.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Organization of information significantly enhances audience understanding of both general and specific concepts, and promotes audience engagement.
Additional Comments:

Technology PS 3.1: Use images and layout of presentations to effectively communicate content to a specific audience.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Images and design elements are used purposefully, and they effectively support audience engagement and understanding of key concepts.
Additional Comments:

Learning Objective LO 5.1: Identify business risks.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Response identifies fewer than three business risks that could prevent the healthcare organization in the case presented from meeting its financial goals within three years, or the risks are not realistic, or response if vague.

Additional Comments:

Funmi, your response identifies fewer than three business risks that could prevent the healthcare organization in the case presented from meeting its financial goals within three years This inititial risk you pose is not realistic for this case study.

Learning Objective LO 5.2: Develop strategies to manage business risks.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Response describes fewer than three strategies developed to manage business risks, or the strategies do not address each of three risks, or the descriptions of the strategies are vague.

Additional Comments:

Because your first risk is not realistic, you are also one strategy short of what is required (3 risks/3 strategies) – you have presented two viable strategies.

Written Communication Objective PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English. Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability.
Additional Comments:Funmi, I am not changing your score for this objective, but you have numerous writing clarity issues that must be addressed before resubmission. I have provided detailed feedback on your papers.

Written Communication PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	Writing is consistently well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are used effectively to enhance clarity, cohesion, and flow.
Additional Comments:

Written Communication PS 1.3: Apply APA style to written work.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3	APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied correctly and consistently throughout the paper. Sources are consistently cited appropriately and accurately.
Additional Comments:

Written Communication PS 1.4: Use appropriate vocabulary and tone for the audience and purpose.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2	Vocabulary and tone are generally appropriate for the audience and support communication of key concepts.
Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.1: Analyze assumptions and fallacies.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Response is weak in assessing the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument. Response does not adequately identify and discuss the implications of fallacies or logical weaknesses in a given argument.

Additional Comments:

P.S. 5.1 and 5.2 refer to the development and analysis of assumptions. Typically, when critically thinking about a problem such as the one posed in this assessment, assumptions would be developed and analyzed, prior to developing solutions. This is a method for critically examining the issue to make sure the solution you recommend is comprehensive and reasonable. For example, you might have an assumption that says leadership will be supportive of XYZ. Your analyses would speak to your understanding of this support and why this assumption is valid or not. For the purposes of this paper, you do not need more than two or three assumptions wherein you can demonstrate the process.

Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Response does not adequately present and discuss key assumptions in an original argument.

Additional Comments:

Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS PS 5.3: Assess multiple perspectives and alternatives.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Response does not identify nor adequately consider multiple perspectives or alternatives.
Additional Comments: Please see my comments throughout your paper regarding this.

Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.4: Use problem-solving skills.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1	Response presents solutions, but they are ineffective in addressing the specific problem.
Additional Comments: The incorrect conclusions regarding the financial viability of this entity are the primary reasons for this score; once you have corrected this analysis and the comments throughout your paper, this area will improve.