feedback
COMPETENCY 1
Propose a strategic plan that integrates feedback from other disciplines and aligns with organizational priorities.
CRITERION
Determine departmental strategic priorities.
Your result: Proficient
Distinguished
Identifies clear, concisely stated, and fully justified departmental strategic priorities.
Proficient
Identifies departmental strategic priorities.
Basic
Identifies departmental priorities that lack a strategic focus, feasibility, or a balanced scorecard perspective.
Non-Performance
Does not identify departmental strategic priorities.
Faculty Comments:
Great job on your introduction and first section of your assessment. I would encourage you to keep things within each criterion section heading of your grading rubric. We do this in a way that helps you to organize your paper. This is very important when publishing or writing formal papers for your organization, etc.
CRITERION
Align departmental strategic priorities with elements of an organization�s strategic plan.
Your result: Non-Performance
Distinguished
Aligns departmental strategic priorities with elements of an organization�s strategic plan. Graphical representations of the alignments are explicit, easily understood, and appropriate for the intended audience.
Proficient
Aligns departmental strategic priorities with elements of an organization�s strategic plan.
Basic
Alignments of departmental strategic priorities with elements of an organization�s strategic plan are unclear in one or more instances.
Non-Performance
Does not align departmental strategic priorities with elements of an organization�s strategic plan.
Faculty Comments:
I do not see this in your assessment. You will need a section heading for this criterion section. You will want a summary of alignment and then a graph that shows how the organizational strategies align with the departmental strategies. There should be an alignment between these.
CRITERION
Create a balanced scorecard for a department or division.
Your result: Basic
Distinguished
Creates a balanced scorecard for a department or division. Provides concise, useful objectives and measures that reflect a clear strategic target and insight into cause and effect relationships.
Proficient
Creates a balanced scorecard for a department or division.
Basic
Creates a scorecard for a department or division that lacks a balanced perspective or clear strategic focus.
Non-Performance
Does not create a balanced scorecard for a department or division.
Faculty Comments:
Nice job on this...I would add a heading for this section and place your summary of the scorecard here instead of up with the first criterion sections. This will keep it organized, then you can add your graph under this section OR you will need to reference the graph within this section in order to add it to the end of the paper.
COMPETENCY 2
Recommend policy changes that support a strategic plan.
CRITERION
Evaluate the effects of organizational policies on departmental strategic priorities.
Your result: Basic
Distinguished
Evaluates the effects of organizational policies on departmental strategic priorities. Clearly articulates the logical implications and consequences of specific policies.
Proficient
Evaluates the effects of organizational policies on departmental strategic priorities.
Basic
Describes policy provisions that affect departmental strategic priorities.
Non-Performance
Does not describe policy provisions that affect departmental strategic priorities.
Faculty Comments:
You have great information in this section, but I need clarification on why you keep calling this a study. This is not a study, but an assessment of a specific department's strategic plan in relation to the organizational plan. All departments should have strategic plans that align with the organizational plans. The organizational plan is more overarching while each departmental strategic plan is more specific to areas of need and policy for that department. I am a little confused by the way this assessment is going...
COMPETENCY 3
Address assessment purpose in effective written or multimedia presentations, incorporating appropriate evidence and communicating in a form and style consistent with applicable professional and academic standards.
CRITERION
Communicate clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and for the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed.
Your result: Basic
Distinguished
Communicates clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and for the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed. Content, form, and style are congruous, engaging, and facilitate audience comprehension. Adheres to all applicable professional, disciplinary, and scholarly communication and design standards.
Proficient
Communicates clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and for the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed.
Basic
Communication lacks clarity, conciseness, or effectiveness at conveying the intended message.
Non-Performance
Does not communicate clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and for the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed.
Faculty Comments:
You have GREAT information in this assessment. I had a hard time following it, because it was not organized. Please look at the criterion section feedback above and see if you can rearrange your assessment into a more organized and flowing paper. Thanks!