help with final due in 24 hours

profilecombs
FEEDBACK.docx

FEEDBACK

1. a good paper, but a little confusing in a few spots. Also, the paper would benefit from a little more detail regarding Midas and the other aspects of the implementation such as data, competition, customer satisfaction, change management, and employee input. Might have covered the steps for implementation of the tune-up process in more detail. The review was about the process in general. Overall, a good effort, just pay attention to the details of the grading rubric to help guide your writing. OK?

2. this is an excellent paper. You covered the healthcare quality topics with good details and good critical thinking. Very good writing skills made the paper easy to read. Very good use of references to support your arguments. Overall, a very good paper.

3. This is a quality paper. Very good writing and analysis, with a good depth of analysis and critical thinking. You covered all the topics in a clear and concise manner, easy to read. Thanks.

4. A very fine paper with good, clear writing skills and very good analysis. The best response to fix the problem is to reduce the scrap rate. This is usually an easy fix, easier than trying to reduce cycle time per machine. Overall, a very good effort.

5. you wrote a fine paper and covered all the important topics with good details and analysis. Very good writing, just be certain that all the facts are properly cited. Your conclusions and decisions are sound. Overall, a very good effort.