Rogerian - The Cull

HIGHLIGHT EVERYTHING YOU CHANGE IN THE PAPER

A few things to consider. The overall tone of the Rogerian needs to come out more. For example, in the opposition, you are mostly summarizing what they view, but you also need to do it in a way that would satisfy the opposition (and make them impressed with how much you can think and feel about the cull the way they do). In your summary version you quite often make statements that go against their view. The same is true for the other section. The conclusion has some good ideas in it, but what exactly from each point of view will specifically help with the cull situation? Also, if you can find other real-life examples to incorporate throughout, that would lift your paper higher. (Maybe there are other situations where species were dealt with and you can add those examples to support one side and the other of the cull.  For style, keep working on it. Overall clear but could use more variety (and some of your labels are incorrect. One example is the subordinative trans. between paragraphs). You labeled that, but it wasn't between a paragraph. Maybe review the transition lecture once more to make sure.