History of Design Final Project Milestone One: Journal: Topic Proposal/Thesis

profileant9879
FAS320FinalProjectGuidelinesareRubric.pdf

1

FAS 320 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

Overview In this final project, you will select and curate at least six thematically connected works of art that support an identified thesis about a significant cultural issue.

You will have the opportunity to demonstrate your command of visual analysis and historical research, while at the same time expressing your own passions,

worldview, or personal interests. The product of your investigation and analyses will be documented in an exhibit prospectus. The project is divided into two

milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be

submitted in Modules Three and Five. The final product will be submitted in Module Seven.

In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:

 Analyze the history and evolution of design, including major artistic movements from the Industrial Revolution to today

 Classify works of art according to period based on their expression of stylistic influences

 Assess the role of the individual and society in personally and communally constructing cultural significance for works of art

 Analyze the subject matter of artwork to determine thematic elements using appropriate terminology

Prompt Your exhibit prospectus should be a polished proposal for an original collection of works of art that are each carefully analyzed and that clearly demonstrate

your overall thesis.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

I. Introduction

A. Set the stage for your exhibit by providing an overview of the various artists, periods, and artistic movements that you plan to showcase. Be sure

to comment on the thematic ties that bind your works together, as well as provide examples of how your selected works may not “fit the mold”

of their time period or your audience’s expectations.

2

B. Identify a thesis for your exhibit that addresses a significant cultural issue. Make sure your thesis is specific enough to offer a unique perspective

while still being clear and concise.

II. Selection of Works of Art: You should include quality images of all of the pieces of art you have selected for your exhibit. They should be from an

authoritative source (e.g., a museum, gallery, or academic institution) to ensure they have not been edited or manipulated from the original.

A. Select a minimum of six works of art that all contribute to the identified thesis.

B. Your selected works of art should be sequenced chronologically according to period and purposefully organized to create flow and continuity.

C. Additionally, your selected works must reflect at least three different artistic mediums discussed in the course.

D. Finally, at least five different design periods or styles (including contemporary) discussed in the course should be represented.

III. Individual Artwork Commentaries: Underneath each of your selected works of art, include a detailed commentary.

A. Identify the factual information available for the work of art, including title, date, artist, dimensions, location, and medium, using appropriate

citations formatted in MLA style.

B. Situate the work of art within its historical context by explaining the artistic movements of the time as well as any sociocultural realities that are

relevant to understanding or appreciating the work of art using specific details.

C. Describe the subject matter in detail and identify all reasonably discernable formal elements that are present.

D. Assess the work of art for its broader thematic elements or figurative meanings, based on your analysis of the subject matter and form.

E. Interpret the work of art in terms of its cultural significance in a way that supports your overall thesis.

F. Apply appropriate terminology for each individual work of art analysis.

Milestones Milestone One: Topic Proposal/Thesis

In Module Three, you will submit your thesis and exhibit explanation to your instructor for approval. Remember that the topic you choose must allow you to

connect several works of art/design objects by tracing a particular theme or concept in those examples. You must also include three of the images you plan to

use for your final project and provide full identification and citations for each image. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric.

Milestone Two: Outline

3

In Module Five, you will submit an outline that includes your topic and the thesis statement from Final Project Milestone One, which should be revised according

to the instructor feedback you received. You must include at least five images (one visual example from at least four different historical style movements, plus

one contemporary visual example). Each image should be identified in full: title of work or description of object (e.g., ceramic bowl), artist or designer, date of

creation, medium (e.g., lithograph poster, bronze sculpture, etc.), and design style (e.g., De Stijl). Under each image, you will provide a brief summary of one to

two paragraphs of the required accompanying text for each image (see final project guidelines). This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.

Final Submission: Exhibit Prospectus

In Module Seven, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should

reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.

Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Introduction:

Overview

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a sophisticated

ability to classify works of art

based on their expression of

complex stylistic influences

Provides an overview of the

various artists and periods that

will be showcased, commenting

on the thematic ties and

examples of how the works

may not “fit the mold” or

audience’s expectations

Provides an overview of the

various artists and periods that

will be showcased but fails to

fully or reasonably comment on

the thematic ties or examples

of how the works may not “fit

the mold” or audience’s

expectations

Does not provide an overview

of the various artists and

periods that will be showcased

8

Introduction: Thesis

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates keen insight into

the cultural significance of

works of art

Identifies an appropriately

clear, concise, and unique

thesis for the exhibit that

addresses a significant cultural

issue

Identifies a thesis for the

exhibit but fails to identify an

appropriately clear, concise, or

unique thesis that addresses a

significant cultural issue

Does not identify a thesis for

the exhibit

8

4

Selection of Works of

Art: Contribute to the

Identified Thesis

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates keen insight into

the cultural significance of

works of art

Selects a minimum of six works

of art that all reasonably

contribute to the identified

thesis

Selects a minimum of six works

of art but fails to select at least

six works of art that all

reasonably contribute to the

identified thesis

Does not select a minimum of

six works of art

8

Selection of Works of

Art: Sequenced

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a sophisticated

ability to classify works of art

based on their expression of

complex stylistic influences

Works of art are accurately

organized by period and into a

purposeful sequence that

creates flow and continuity

Works of art are organized by

period, but there are inaccurate

classifications or missed

opportunities for creating flow

and continuity

Works of art are not discernibly

organized by period

8

Selection of Works of

Art: Mediums

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a nuanced

understanding of the history of

design

Works of art are representative

of at least three different

mediums discussed in the

course

Works of art are representative

of fewer than three different

mediums discussed in the

course

Not all works of art are

representative of mediums

discussed in the course

8

Selection of Works of

Art: Periods or Styles

Represented

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a sophisticated

ability to classify works of art

based on their expression of

complex stylistic influences

Works of art are representative

of at least five different periods

or styles (including

contemporary) discussed in the

course

Works of art are representative

of fewer than five different

periods or styles discussed in

the course

Not all works of art are

representative of periods or

styles discussed in the course

8

Individual Artwork

Commentaries:

Factual Information

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a nuanced

understanding of the history of

design

Identifies factual information

for each work of art, including

title, date, artist, dimensions,

location, and medium, using

appropriate citations

Identifies factual information

for each work of art but fails to

fully detail all available

information or use appropriate

citations throughout

Does not identify factual

information for each work of

art

8

5

Individual Artwork

Commentaries:

Historical Context

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a nuanced

understanding of the history of

design

Situates each work of art within

its historical context by

explaining the artistic

movements of the time and any

sociocultural realities relevant

to understanding or

appreciating the work of art

using specific details

Situates each work of art within

its historical context but fails to

explain the artistic movements

of the time or the sociocultural

realities that are relevant to

understanding or appreciating

the work of art using specific

details

Does not situate each work of

art within its historical context

8

Individual Artwork

Commentaries:

Subject Matter

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a sophisticated

ability to conduct a visual

analysis of works of art using

appropriate terminology

Accurately describes the

subject matter of each work of

art in details and correctly

identifies all reasonably

discernable formal elements

Describes the subject matter of

each work of art but fails to use

sufficient, accurate details or to

correctly identify all reasonably

discernable formal elements

Does not describe the subject

matter of each work of art

8

Individual Artwork

Commentaries:

Thematic Elements

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a sophisticated

ability to conduct a visual

analysis of works of art using

appropriate terminology

Reasonably assesses each work

of art for its broader thematic

elements or figurative

meanings based on the analysis

of subject matter and form

Assesses each work of art for its

broader thematic elements or

figurative meanings, but claims

are not fully reasonable or

based on the analysis of subject

matter and form

Does not assess each work of

art for its broader thematic

elements or figurative

meanings

8

Individual Artwork

Commentaries:

Cultural Significance

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates keen insight into

the cultural significance of

works of art

Interprets each work of art for

its cultural significance in a way

that supports the overall thesis

Interprets each work of art for

its cultural significance but fails

to make fully reasonable claims

that all support the overall

thesis

Does not interpret each work of

art for its cultural significance

8

Individual Artwork

Commentaries:

Appropriate

Terminology

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a sophisticated

ability to conduct a visual

analysis of works of art using

appropriate terminology

Applies appropriate

terminology throughout each

individual work of art analysis

Applies appropriate

terminology in places but does

not consistently use correct

vocabulary for each individual

work of art analysis

Consistently misuses

terminology throughout

individual work of art analyses,

reflecting fundamental

misunderstandings of critical

vocabulary

8

6

Articulation of

Response

Submission is free of errors

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, and

organization and is presented in

a professional and easy-to-read

format

Submission has no major errors

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organization

that negatively impact

readability and articulation of

main ideas

Submission has critical errors

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organization

that prevent understanding of

ideas

4

Total 100%