Assignment 1: LASA – Final Project Report

profilecreativeflocka
FallonC_M3_A2copy.doc

Running Head: DISTRICT4WAREHOUSEMOVE 1

DISTRICT4WAREHOUSEMOVE 6

District4WarehouseMove

Cannon_F_M3_A2

August 24th,2018

Please see my comments below to see the items that need to be addressed in the write-up (report).

District4WarehouseMove

(a) Project plan with precedence relationship is given below:

ID

Task

Estimated Duration

Pred1ecessor

1

Start of the project

4

2

Documents of the project

8

1

3

Status Meetings/Reports

2

2

4

Initial Meetings Planning

4

3

5

Permits of Electricity

11

4

6

Permits of Plumbing

11

4

7

Permits of Buildings

15

5

8

Framing

55

5

9

Electrical

11

6

10

Plumbing

11

7

11

Drywall

2

8

12

Work Finnish

30

9,10,11,12

13

Workbenches

19

12

14

Packing Equipment

16

13

15

Move

2

14

16

Closure Procurement

2

15

17

Closure Project

9

16

(b) Project network diagram (Activity on Node) diagram is following

image1.png

(c) Alternative paths and Critical path are as listed below

image2.png

For the whole project to be completed, it will take up to 122 days.

References (What is it you are referencing when there is no write-up?)

Mind Tool, Inc. (2013) Project Management Phases and Processes. Retrieved October 26, 2013 from 

Piscopo, M. (2013) Performance Report. Retrieved October 26, 2013 from  http://www.projectmanagementdocs.com/project-documents/performance-report.html

Project Closure (n.d.) Retrieved October 26, 2013 from  https://wiki.state.ma.us/confluence/download/attachments/69894234/Closure+Training.pdf

Comments:

The project plan was not correctly developed and the appropriate work breakdown structure (WBS) was not properly completed.

The predecessor column was not correctly completed and set included additional aspects that set it apart from the ordinary.

Critical paths activities were not correctly identified with additional insights.

The risks that would impact the project schedule were not correctly identified with appropriate information/action to mitigate those risks.

The paper was not adequately organized with a good introduction and conclusion. There was no writing to assess spelling/grammar error. APA elements were not appropriately addressed.