Finance homework

profileFaris69
Faisal1.xlsx

1& 2

Inputs: Security deposit 210,000
Cost of Equipment 3,600,000 Lease Payment 935,000
Depreciable life (Years) 4 Tax rate 35.00%
Salvage Value 440,000 Before-tax Cost of Debt 11.00%
Outputs:
After-tax Cost of Debt 7.15%
Buy
3- Years MACRs 33.33% 44.45% 14.81% 7.41%
Depreciation Expense 1,199,880 1,600,200 533,160 266,760
Depreciation Tax Shield 419,958 560,070 186,606 93,366
Period 0 1 2 3 4
Cash Flows (3,600,000) 419,958 560,070 186,606 379,366
NPV(buy)= (2,280,761)
Lease
After-tax Lease Payment 607,750
Period 0 1 2 3 4
Cash Flows (817,750) (607,750) (607,750) (607,750) 210,000
NPV(lease)= (2,249,004)
NPV( Lease minus Buy) 31,756
Net Advantage to Leasing (NAL) 31,756
Period 0 1 2 3 4
Cash Flows ( Buy minus Lease) 2,782,250 (1,027,708) (1,167,820) (794,356) (169,366)
NPV( Lease minusBuy) 31,756
Net Advantage to Leasing (NAL) 31,756
It is profitable for the company to go for leasing option rather buying.
2 Book value of Equipment after 2 years 799,920
Salvage value after 2 years 1,440,000
Tax on Salvage value 224,028
After-Tax Salvage Value in 2 Years 1,215,972
Period 0 1 2
Saved purchase cost of equipment 3,600,000
Loss of salvage value (1,215,972)
Loss of depreciation Tax Shield (419,958) (560,070)
Lease Payments (1,650,000) (1,650,000)
Tax shield on Lease Payments 577,500 577,500
Cash flow from Leasing 2,527,500 (1,492,458) (1,776,042)
NAL (412,292)
Going by the above calculations, it might be concluded that it is favorable to buy the equipment as NAL is negative. However, the lease will now be classified as an operating lease as the lease is for 2 years which is less than 75% of the economic life of the asset. Now, we will determine the present value of lease payments with use of company's cost of debt as follows:
Present Value of Lease Payments = 1,650,000 + 1,650,000/(1+11%)^1 = $3,136,486.49
The present value of lease payments is less than 90% (3,600,000*90% = $3,240,000) of the cost of equipment. In case, the lease contract allows for transfer of ownership to lesses at the termination of the contract or there is an option for bargain purchase, the lease cannot be treated as a capital lease (as per the relevant accounting standard requirements). Therefore, the suggestion to revise the lease terms in order to make it appear an an operating lease is not ethical on Nick's part as it would result in the lease obligation not getting reported in the balance sheet.

3

Analyzing the purchase option:
a) At the fair market value
- Buyer will not get the expected purchase value in advance
- The option will have no effect on the value of the lease
- The option can be used if an agreement is done to (1) keep payments low (2) avoid equipment obsolescence
b) To purchase at a fixed price:
The option might Increase the value of the lease; Purchasing equipment at the end the of the lease at below market value might result in saving money but it comes at a cost of used machine and of less economic value. Warf computer might also consider an option to purchase at the minimum value and then resell in the open market after the lease agreement expires.
c) Purchasing at a price of $250,000.
A Very high inclusion of payment in the NPV calculation; $250,000 at the end of 4 years will surely a bargain price considering the salvage value of similar machine to be $780,000.

4.

4 Cancellation option gives the Warf Computers the right to cancel the lease contract before the expiration period of 2 years (or before taking the next lease agreement in 2-year option). Under this condition, the equipment needs to be sent back to the owner and under such condition, the owner might consider the actual economic value of the product/technology at that point of time, which may result in increasing the lease contract value.