EXSUM

5/23/23, 11:04 AM MLC 3.0 RESIDENT CURRICULUM TEMPLATE

https://ncolcoe.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_31447_1&course_id=_12007_1 1/4

EXSUM Rubric FY23

Write an Executive Summary (EXSUM) based on the assigned historical case study. Structure your EXSUM to address EACH NCO C3 as follows: -- Describe the NCO C3. -- Explain the NCO C3. -- Transition to the case study. -- Provide example from the case study that ties back to the NCO C3 (if none provided, use your own). -- Highlight the key points that explicitly answer the question. -- Transition to the next NCO C3 and repeat. Cite at least two references. The goal of the EXSUM is to give you a tool to use throughout your career when summarizing events. The case studies will allow you to see how the actors represented or embodied these current competencies. Late submission subtract 10 points per day. Refer to the NCO C3 de�nitions in TC 7-22.7 (pp. 2-2 and 2-3), EXSUM Example/Explained - Operation Anaconda documents, M423 Advance Sheet (for linkage to other lessons that further reinforce each NCO C3), and use the EXSUM_Template.docx as your template.

  Levels of Achievement

Criteria Does Not Meet Standard

Meets The Standard Exceeds Standard Far Exceeds Standard

NCO Common Core Competency 1

20.00 %

Did not identify or explain the NCO Common Core Competency with enough detail to convince the reader that the writer performed adequate research.

70.00 %

The NCO Common Core Competency identi�ed is accurate but at times unclear; key components are present but not fully rounded out with detail and facts. The supporting documentation is basic, and supporting information has minimal detail.

80.00 %

The NCO Common Core Competency is identi�ed and explained appropriately and the writer added additional information related to the required component to support NCO Common Core Competency.

100.00 %

The NCO Common Core Competency is clearly identi�ed and succinctly explained. The writer provided supporting information on the NCO Common Core Competency providing a clear and complete description.

NCO Common Core Competency 2

20.00 %

Did not identify or explain the NCO Common Core Competency with enough detail to

70.00 %

The NCO Common Core Competency identi�ed is accurate but at times unclear; key components are present but not fully

80.00 %

The NCO Common Core Competency is identi�ed and explained appropriately and the

100.00 %

The NCO Common Core Competency is clearly identi�ed and succinctly explained. The writer provided supporting

Name

Description

Rubric Detail

Weight 15.00%

Weight 15.00%

5/23/23, 11:04 AM MLC 3.0 RESIDENT CURRICULUM TEMPLATE

https://ncolcoe.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_31447_1&course_id=_12007_1 2/4

  Levels of Achievement

Criteria Does Not Meet Standard

Meets The Standard Exceeds Standard Far Exceeds Standard

convince the reader that the writer performed adequate research.

rounded out with detail and facts. The supporting documentation is basic, and supporting information has minimal detail.

writer added additional information related to the required component to support NCO Common Core Competency.

information on the NCO Common Core Competency providing a clear and complete description.

Accuracy 20.00 %

There were no references made from the case study/vignette or the references made contained fallacies or were out of context.

70.00 %

Chose appropriate references from the case study/vignette to support the topic.

80.00 %

Used references from the case study/vignette in a way that supported the topic for maximum impact on the relevant topic.

100.00 %

Chose references from the case study/vignette signi�cantly impacting the topic. Expertly tied the topic to references chosen.

Syntax and Mechanics

20.00 %

There are �ve to six grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors that make the paper unreadable or hard to follow.

70.00 %

Sentences and paragraphs are adequate in style and structure. There are three to four grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Less than �ve passive voice sentences excluding directly quoted material.

80.00 %

Sentences and paragraphs are well written. There are one or two grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Less than three passive voice sentences, excluding directly quoted material.

100.00 %

Sentences and paragraphs are clear, concise, well written and free of passive voice excluding directly quoted material. Facilitates a logical �ow of thoughts and ideas.

Organization 20.00 %

Written work does not progress logically and ideas are not fully

70.00 %

Written work, per assignment directions, progresses logically and

80.00 %

Written work, per assignment directions, progresses logically

100.00 %

Written work, per assignment directions, progresses logically and

Weight 25.00%

Weight 15.00%

Weight 10.00%

5/23/23, 11:04 AM MLC 3.0 RESIDENT CURRICULUM TEMPLATE

https://ncolcoe.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_31447_1&course_id=_12007_1 3/4

  Levels of Achievement

Criteria Does Not Meet Standard

Meets The Standard Exceeds Standard Far Exceeds Standard

developed. Transitions between paragraphs and ideas are often missing or incomplete. Lack of cohesion within paragraphs makes it di�cult to follow the paper's �ow.

ideas formed. Transitions between paragraphs and ideas are su�cient.

and ideas are complete. Transitions between paragraphs and ideas are smooth. Paragraphs are developed. Reader can follow the paper’s �ow.

ideas are well developed and cohesive. There is a clear beginning, middle, and end. Paragraphs are well developed; transitions are seamless. Easy to follow.

Research 20.00 %

Did not cite the case study. Sources outside of the case study/vignette are not relevant or credible. Did not properly cite sources IAW APA standard format.

70.00 %

Cited case study and additional source which is credible and relevant. Used relevant quotes to support work. Properly cited sources IAW APA standard format.

80.00 %

Cited case study and additional sources which are credible and relevant. Used more than one additional source. Properly cited sources IAW APA standard format.

100.00 %

Cited case study and additional sources which are credible and relevant. Used three or more sources. Sources ranged in diverse material such as scholarly journals relevant professional manuals, white papers, and published research from leading authorities. Properly cited sources IAW APA standard format.

Directly Quoted Material

20.00 %

25% or more directly quoted material.

70.00 %

24-17% directly quoted material.

80.00 %

16-9% directly quoted material.

100.00 %

8% or less directly quoted material.

Weight 15.00%

Weight 5.00%

View Associated Items

5/23/23, 11:04 AM MLC 3.0 RESIDENT CURRICULUM TEMPLATE

https://ncolcoe.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_31447_1&course_id=_12007_1 4/4

Print Close Window