6 page paper
Experiential Papers Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
|
Name/Brief History of Organization |
16 to 18 points Each of the following are thoroughly identified: Name and Brief History of Organization (introduce what it is: AA, NA, Al-Anon; how long has it been around; important individuals and milestones in its development; future goals, etc.). |
14 to 15 points This section is not thorough in identifying the following: name and Brief History of Organization (introduce what it is: AA, NA, Al-Anon; how long has it been around; important individuals and milestones in its development; future goals, etc.). |
1 to 13 points Two or more essential elements of this section are missing: Name and Brief History of Organization (introduce what it is: AA, NA, Al-Anon; how long has it been around; important individuals and milestones in its development; future goals, etc.). |
0 points These things are not discussed. |
|
Setup, Methodology/ Model of Treatment |
16 to 18 points Each of the following are thoroughly identified: How the Meetings are Run/Organized (what helping model it is based on; what the “leader’s” role is; how the group recognizes success stories; what they do for relapses, etc.). |
14 to 15 points This section is not thorough in identifying the following: How the Meetings are Run/Organized (what helping model it is based on; what the “leader’s” role is; how the group recognizes success stories; what they do for relapses, etc.). |
1 to 13 points Two or more essential elements of this section are missing: How the Meetings are Run/Organized (what helping model it is based on; what the “leader’s” role is; how the group recognizes success stories; what they do for relapses, etc.). |
0 points These areas are not included in the paper. |
|
Personal Observations |
15 to 17 points Each of the following are thoroughly identified: Personal Observations of the Meetings (what I saw; what was interesting; observations of the group members [no names]; particular stories that caught my attention, etc.). |
13 to 14 points This section is not thorough in identifying the following: Personal Observations of the Meetings (what I saw; what was interesting; observations of the group members [no names]; particular stories that caught my attention, etc.). |
1 to 12 points Two or more essential elements of this section are missing: Personal Observations of the Meetings (what I saw; what was interesting; observations of the group members [no names]; particular stories that caught my attention, etc.). |
0 points This is not present. |
|
Conclusion, Good Method of Treatment |
15 to 17 points Each of the following are thoroughly identified: Conclusion (what I learned; is it a good model of treatment; how could I use this in my work/practice in the future, etc.). |
13 to 14 points This section is not thorough in identifying the following: Conclusion (what I learned; is it a good model of treatment; how could I use this in my work/practice in the future, etc.). |
1 to 12 points Two or more essential elements of this section are missing: Conclusion (what I learned; is it a good model of treatment; how could I use this in my work/practice in the future, etc.). |
0 points Work settings and practice standards are not present. |
|
Structure |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
|
Mechanics |
9 to 10 points No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate. |
8 points Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate. |
1 to 7 points Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. |
0 points Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are misused. Writing style is difficult to understand. Word choice is poor. |
|
APA Format Elements |
9 to 10 points Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, citations, running head, and references are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. An Abstract is not needed. |
8 points Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page, citations, running head, and references are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. |
1 to 7 points Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, citations, running head, and references are included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect. |
0 points Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page, running head, and references are not included or not formatted correctly. Paper is not double-spaced, margins are incorrect, or font is incorrect. |
|
Research Elements |
9 to 10 points Major points are supported by at least 3–4 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook. Paper is appropriate length of 6–7 pages. |
8 points Major points are supported by 1–2 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook. Paper is not the appropriate length and is either excessively long or too brief. |
1 to 7 points Major points are supported by at least 1 scholarly source and the textbook is not listed/or the resources are not scholarly. Paper is not the appropriate length and is either excessively long or too brief. |
0 points Major points are not supported scholarly sources. Paper is not the appropriate length of 6–7 pages. |
|
Total: /100 |
Instructor’s Comments:
Page 2 of 2