6 page paper

profilen33dpap3rs
Experiential_Papers_Grading_Rubric.docx

Experiential Papers Grading Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not Present

Name/Brief History of Organization

16 to 18 points

Each of the following are thoroughly identified: Name and Brief History of Organization (introduce what it is: AA, NA, Al-Anon; how long has it been around; important individuals and milestones in its development; future goals, etc.).

14 to 15 points

This section is not thorough in identifying the following: name and Brief History of Organization (introduce what it is: AA, NA, Al-Anon; how long has it been around; important individuals and milestones in its development; future goals, etc.).

1 to 13 points

Two or more essential elements of this section are missing: Name and Brief History of Organization (introduce what it is: AA, NA, Al-Anon; how long has it been around; important individuals and milestones in its development; future goals, etc.).

0 points

These things are not discussed.

Setup, Methodology/ Model of Treatment

16 to 18 points

Each of the following are thoroughly identified: How the Meetings are Run/Organized (what helping model it is based on; what the “leader’s” role is; how the group recognizes success stories; what they do for relapses, etc.).

14 to 15 points

This section is not thorough in identifying the following: How the Meetings are Run/Organized (what helping model it is based on; what the “leader’s” role is; how the group recognizes success stories; what they do for relapses, etc.).

1 to 13 points

Two or more essential elements of this section are missing: How the Meetings are Run/Organized (what helping model it is based on; what the “leader’s” role is; how the group recognizes success stories; what they do for relapses, etc.).

0 points

These areas are not included in the paper.

Personal Observations

15 to 17 points

Each of the following are thoroughly identified: Personal Observations of the Meetings (what I saw; what was interesting; observations of the group members [no names]; particular stories that caught my attention, etc.).

13 to 14 points

This section is not thorough in identifying the following: Personal Observations of the Meetings (what I saw; what was interesting; observations of the group members [no names]; particular stories that caught my attention, etc.).

1 to 12 points

Two or more essential elements of this section are missing: Personal Observations of the Meetings (what I saw; what was interesting; observations of the group members [no names]; particular stories that caught my attention, etc.).

0 points

This is not present.

Conclusion, Good Method of Treatment

15 to 17 points

Each of the following are thoroughly identified: Conclusion (what I learned; is it a good model of treatment; how could I use this in my work/practice in the future, etc.).

13 to 14 points

This section is not thorough in identifying the following: Conclusion (what I learned; is it a good model of treatment; how could I use this in my work/practice in the future, etc.).

1 to 12 points

Two or more essential elements of this section are missing: Conclusion (what I learned; is it a good model of treatment; how could I use this in my work/practice in the future, etc.).

0 points

Work settings and practice standards are not present.

Structure

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not Present

Mechanics

9 to 10 points

No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate.

8 points

Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate.

1 to 7 points

Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good.

0 points

Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are misused. Writing style is difficult to understand. Word choice is poor.

APA Format Elements

9 to 10 points

Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, citations, running head, and references are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. An Abstract is not needed.

8 points

Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page, citations, running head, and references are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.

1 to 7 points

Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, citations, running head, and references are included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.

0 points

Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page, running head, and references are not included or not formatted correctly. Paper is not double-spaced, margins are incorrect, or font is incorrect.

Research Elements

9 to 10 points

Major points are supported by at least 3–4 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook. Paper is appropriate length of 6–7 pages.

8 points

Major points are supported by 1–2 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook. Paper is not the appropriate length and is either excessively long or too brief.

1 to 7 points

Major points are supported by at least 1 scholarly source and the textbook is not listed/or the resources are not scholarly. Paper is not the appropriate length and is either excessively long or too brief.

0 points

Major points are not supported scholarly sources. Paper is not the appropriate length of 6–7 pages.

Total: /100

Instructor’s Comments:

Page 2 of 2