This is Quantitative Decision Making for Business.
Q5
| Activity | Preceding Activity | Expected Completion Time | ||
| (half months) | ||||
| A - Write book | - | 22 | ||
| B - Design book | A | 2 | ||
| C - Edit manuscript | A | 12 | ||
| D - Check editing | C | 4 | ||
| E - Accept design | B | 2 | ||
| F –Copy edit | D, E | 4 | ||
| G – Prepare artwork | D, E | 8 | ||
| H – Accept and correct artwork | G | 1 | ||
| I – Set galleys | F | 8 | ||
| J – Check and correct galleys | I | 2 | ||
| K – Pull page proofs | H, J | 4 | ||
| L – Check and correct pages | K | 2 | ||
| M- Prepare index | K | 2 | ||
| N – Set and correct index | M | 1 | ||
| O – Check camera-ready copy | L, N | 1 | ||
| P – Print and bind book | O | 4 | ||
Q6
| Month | Seasonal Factor | Year | Month | Actual (Nominal) Value | |
| Initial Seasonally Adjusted Forecast | 78 | α | 25% | ||
| Initial Trend Estimate | 0 | β | 20% | ||
| Jan | 0.90 | 1 | Jan | 68 | |
| Feb | 0.88 | 1 | Feb | 71 | |
| Mar | 0.91 | 1 | Mar | 66 | |
| Apr | 0.93 | 1 | Apr | 72 | |
| May | 0.96 | 1 | May | 77 | |
| June | 1.09 | 1 | June | 85 | |
| July | 1.17 | 1 | July | 94 | |
| Aug | 1.15 | 1 | Aug | 96 | |
| Sep | 0.97 | 1 | Sep | 80 | |
| Oct | 0.91 | 1 | Oct | 73 | |
| Nov | 1.05 | 1 | Nov | 84 | |
| Dec | 1.08 | 1 | Dec | 89 | |
| Jan | 0.90 | 2 | Jan | 75 | |
| Feb | 0.88 | 2 | Feb | 76 | |
| Mar | 0.91 | 2 | Mar | 81 | |
| Apr | 0.93 | 2 | Apr | 84 | |
| May | 0.96 | 2 | May | 85 | |
| June | 1.09 | 2 | June | 99 | |
| July | 1.17 | 2 | July | 107 | |
| Aug | 1.15 | 2 | Aug | 108 | |
| Sep | 0.97 | 2 | Sep | 94 | |
| Oct | 0.91 | 2 | Oct | 90 | |
| Nov | 1.05 | 2 | Nov | 106 | |
| Dec | 1.08 | 2 | Dec | 110 | |
| Type of Seasonality | |||||
| Monthly |
Time Period
Seasonally-Adjusted Value
Q7
| Activities \ Days | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Activity 1 | 5 | 22 | 36 | 48 | 52 | 55 | 58 | 60 | 61 |
| Activity 2 | 22 | 30 | 37 | 44 | 49 | 54 | 58 | 60 | 61 |
| Activity 3 | 46 | 52 | 56 | 59 | 62 | 65 | 67 | 68 | 69 |
| Activity 4 | 30 | 40 | 48 | 55 | 59 | 62 | 64 | 66 | 67 |
Q8
| Fashion Line | Jorge Vera (avant-garde) | Paolo Ricci (business attire) |
| Net cost of San Fransisco pre-test | $200,000 | $75,000 |
| Additional cost of U.S. production of line after a San Francisco pre-test | $500,000 | $275,000 |
| Cost of U.S. production if not pre-tested in San Francisco | $600,000 | $325,000 |
| Revenue if fashion line is a "hit" | $4,300,000 | $2,400,000 |
| Revenue if fashion line is a "miss" | $300,000 | $100,000 |