Digital marketing

profilesaranya_99
ExampleReport.pdf

1

Social Media Content Plan Mountain Warehouse

C10 DM

W or d c ount: 2 10 2

2

1. The Social Impact Theory

Latané (1981) introduced the “social impact theory” (SIT) which outlined the concept of “social

impact” as the variety of influences on a person’s attitudes, beliefs and behaviours. These influences

will be enforced by the imagined, implied or real actions and presences of other individuals (Latané,

1981).In this section, the SIT will be applied by the content plan in order to achieve the main ‘specific,

measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound’ (SMART) objective of doubling the existing 150

consumer referrals to the main website from the utilised social media platforms (Bjerke and Renger,

2016, p. 125). This objective will be achieved by increasing the level of “online consumer engagement”

(OCE). Valenzuela, Park and Kee (2009) claim that OCE, which consists of how the brand’s social media

posts’ ratings, comments and responses with user generated content (UGC), can stimulate sales and

other consumer behaviours which benefit the brand beyond the transactions. These manifested

behaviours include brand discussions as well as increased brand involvement, intimacy and influence

amongst its customers (Van Doorn et al, 2010).

Figure 1, the constituents of the Social Impact Theory (Perez-Vega, Waite, O’Gorman, 2016).

The SIT suggests that the interaction of these three components multiplies their combined social impact (Latané, 1981).

3

1.1 Message Strength

As shown in figure 1, the SIT consists of three components which create social impact, the first

component which will be used to increase the number of referrals of Mountain Warehouse’s social

media posts will be the “strength” of the message. This type of influence can be broken down into

“trans-situational” or “situational” types of message strength.

1.1.1 Situational Strength

The situational strength derives influence from addressing the context in which the brand or its

consumers are present in a way which improves the brand’s reputation and identity. Perez-Vega,

Waite and O’Gorman (2016) found that situational strength could be derived from choosing

appropriate actors for the audience such as Mountain Warehouse employing prominent

mountaineers, skiers, hikers and other outdoor activists to promote their products with their credible

approvals and assurances of quality and value. For instance, Mountain Warehouse could use

successful or famous Winter Olympic Games athletes to endorse their products and ultimately

increase the situational strength of each message, see figure 2. However, some athletes can be

expensive to utilise especially when aiming to achieve a short-term objective which focuses on

increasing referrals through OCE.

Figure 2, an example of attaching a brand to an expert who holds situational power over skiers, in

this case an Olympic gold medal-winning skier (Svindal, 2019).

READ ABOUT AKSEL LUND SVINDAL’S STORY WITH

4

1.1.2 Trans-Situational Strength

Conversely however, this content plan will also propose the use of “trans-situational” message

strength. The content plan’s trans-situational messages will increase their salience through the

portrayal of models with appropriate physical and perceived characteristics such as appearance,

ethnicity, gender, age, and intelligence. As shown below in Figure 3, the models fulfill the role of

symbolizing style, success, maturity and youth while attaching such strong values to the products and

ultimately - their consumers.

Figure 3, an example of increased message strength through trans-situational aesthetic appeal

(eBay, 2019).

Here both models have confident

stances and facial expressions in

order to attach the values of

intelligence, success and style

with the advertised skiing base

layer products.

5

1.2 Message Immediacy

Another method of increasing the social impact and engagement of a message would be to increase

its presence or proximity towards its intended audience (Perez-Vega, Waite and O’Gorman, 2016).

Immediacy can be further broken down into three categories which will be covered in the following

sections. The social media content plan for Mountain Warehouse can use these three types of

immediacy to increase the levels of online consumer engagement (OCE) in order to attract 150

referrals refer to figure 4 below for.

Figure 4, a diagram of how immediacy stimulates OCE for Facebook and Instagram (Perez-Vega,

Waite, O’Gorman, 2016).

Page

Following/Likin

Content Liking

Content

Commenting

Content

Sharing

Physical

Immediac

Temporal

Immediac

Social

Immediac

6

1.2.1 Physical Immediacy

Physical immediacy raises the engagement of the social media post by being more relatable to its

audience due to close geographic proximity (Trope and Liberman, 2010). Pedersen et al., (2008) as

well as Bourgeois and Bowen (2001) both respectively discovered the causality between proximity and

social impact. Their studies found that physically close students are more likely to succumb to peer-

pressure and the sharing of beliefs and values rather than to those students who are less close

physically (Pedersen et al., 2008; Bourgeois and Bowen, 2001). Hence, this content plan will utilize

physical proximity of content in order to appeal and engage with its audiences in the UK, refer to figure

5 below.

With many Mountain Warehouse outlets in the UK, a large concentration of which can be found here in

central London, this content plan launch promotions in close proximity to these stores which will

increase the social impact, OCE levels, as well as meet or exceed the referral target of the firm’s

messages.

Figure 5, a hotspot of Mountain Warehouse retail stores which all can simultaneously benefit from

“close proximity promotion”.

7

1.2.2 Temporal Immediacy

This type of immediacy utilizes time-related proximity between the message and its recipient, this

type of immediacy can be used by marketers to quickly stimulate desired responses such as OCE or

purchasing behaviour (Shen and Chiou, 2010). Perez-Vega, Waite and O’Gorman (2016) have also

found that increased temporal distance can also diminish social impact hence this content plan will

aim to avoid this potential limitation. The example of temporal immediacy shown in figure 6 below

can be replicated in the social media content plan for Mountain Warehouse.

Figure 6, a conceptual application of temporal immediacy in order to increase OCE and sales during a

“70% off “discount promotion (Mountain Warehouse, 2019).

1.2.3 Social immediacy

The third type of immediacy relates to the need for similarity with other members of the society

(Heider, 1958). Additionally consumers prefer to be surrounded by like-minded people with whom

they feel more socially connected (Miller, Downs and Prentice, 1998). Strong social immediacy (SI)

increases reciprocity and trust between consumers while weak SI disrupts communication and clarity

of messages between brand and consumer (Charness, Haruvy, and Sonsino, 2007; Rosette et al.,

2012). Hence, this content plan will aim to utilise the social awareness theory’s discovered

phenomenon of psychological closeness having a positive correlation with social awareness and a

negative correlation with encouraging a ‘self-centered behaviour’ (Perez-Vega, Waite, and O’Gorman,

2016, pp. 309). Social immediacy increases the levels of engagement in social media (Perez-Vega,

Waite, and O’Gorman, 2016), Mountain Warehouse reposts user generated content on their

Instagram feed in order to reduce psychological distance between them and their customers as shown

below in figure 7.

DON’T MISS OUT!

LAST CHANCE!

COUNTDOWN TILL OFFER ENDS:

2d:23h:59m:58s SAVE WITH MOUNTAIN WAREHOUSE!

8

Figure 7, examples of social immediacy through psychological closeness between the brand and its

consumers (Tesser, 1988; Instagram, 2019).

karimkovalenko good use of situational message strength

karimkovalenkoI’d love for my winter posts to get shared on this page too! Fingers crossed! #socialimmediacy

Mountain Warehouse uses UGC to

become more psychologically

intimate with their consumers who

may both directly or indirectly

advocate the brand on social media.

If the brand chooses one of their

consumers to be featured on their

page they are then more likely to

become involved with the brand

and listen to its messages more

attentively and cooperatively.

This content plan will create social

immediacy by giving its followers

chances to win prizes, discounts and

publicity as a reward for being

involved with Mountain

Warehouse’s Instagram and

Facebook pages.

The tone of the plan’s

communication style will aim to be

friendly and informal to avoid the

content feeling like pure promotion

and in-turn develop and maintain

the relationships MW has with its

customers.

9

1.3 Number of Sources

The third main component of SIT is the quantity of seen influential sources; increasing the number of

sources has a positive causal relationship with increases in social impact (Latané, 1981). However, the

effectiveness of social influence type has been debated to be limited, with more than three sources

having no increase in social impact (Asch, 1961). Additionally, this influence type has been found to

have varied optimal numbers of sources depending on the context and situation, while exceeding the

optimal amount is detrimental for creating social impact (Tanford and Penrod, 1984; Latané and Wolf,

1981).

Figure 8, the current post frequency of MW on its Facebook page is one post per two days.

This modest frequency of posts allows MW to communicate without forcing their messages on to its audience to avoid negative engagement and lack of attention given to the posts.

However, it also limits the amount of exposure they receive as it is only once per two days, this means that people that do not browse their feeds frequently might not see the posts at all.

The content calendar will propose a posting schedule which will aim to optimize engagement through the amount of posts through the chosen week. It will aim for a strong presence without forcing the message to the point of it producing a negative effect.

10

2. Content Strategy for Engagement

This section will propose the week-long digital marketing strategy for Mountain Warehouse with the

use of the “Honeycomb of Social Media” and the “Ladder of Engagement and Segmentation” models.

2.1 Content Plan for Facebook and Instagram

Firstly, this strategy will utilise two ‘functional blocks of social media’ (Kietzmann et al., 2011, pp. 243),

in the framework shown in figure 9. The table in appendix 1 will analyse and critically evaluate the

chosen quadrants of this framework in order to outline and justify the chosen direction for this content

plan. The plan will focus on the two quadrants highlighted in yellow below, however the entire model

will be considered when formulating this strategy (Kietzmann et al., 2011).

Figure 9, ‘The Honeycomb of Social Media’ (Kietzmann et al., 2011).

Identity

Relationship s

Presence

Sharing

Conversatio ns

Reputation

Groups

11

2.1.1 Honeycomb Model: Groups

As seen in figure 9’s “groups” quadrant, the content plan will communicate with new audiences

through partnerships with relevant social media communities which revolve around travel, hiking and

skiing. This decision utilizes situational strength and social immediacy as outlined in sections 1.1 and

1.2.3 (Perez-Vega, Waite and O’Gorman, 2016). Refer to appendix 2 for examples of relevant groups

and influencers for partnerships.

2.1.2 Honeycomb Model: Sharing

As shown in figure 12, the audiences will be continuously encouraged to share Mountain Warehouse’s

content through various rewards or by appealing to the aesthetic or lifestyle preferences of MW’s

followers. However, posts must have relevant characteristics in order to create enough engagement

which increases the probability of a post being shared.

2.1.3 The Ladder of Engagement and Segmentation

The ultimate target is to get as many as 150 individuals to the minimum engagement segment labeled

as “joiners” refer to figure 10 below. The plan recognizes the fact that increasing the engagement and

referrals of these passive users is a less time, resource, and cost-intensive process as opposed to the

“inactives”. The “inactive” segment requires the strongest forms of social impact to engage. This will

be achieved through a variety of posts which will be uploaded during peak-usage hours of Facebook

and Instagram during the Christmas holidays. The calendar’s posts will begin to enter user-feeds on

the 19th of December and finally ending with a clearance sale on the 26th known as “Boxing Day”. The

content calendar can be seen in appendix 4.

12

2.2 Example Posts for Engagement

The initial stages of the plan will aim to encourage the potential customers of MW to share content

by giving them rewards for it as shown in figure 11 of section 2.2.

Figure 12, Instagram post which incentivises users to share content with their friends and family by

rewarding each referral.

These posts are aimed at engaging the audience through situational strength, temporal immediacy

and social immediacy if groups of people begin discussing and sharing this content in order to receive

a chance to win more than originally offered. The posts will be replicated across both Facebook and

Instagram as it is not efficient to host offers exclusive to a single platform. This content plan will utilise

integrated marketing communications.

Stay warmer together with your

friends and loved ones this

Christmas!

Receive -20% off all our winter

products purchased from our

website!

Refer your friends and get a free

£10 gift voucher added to your

online MW wallet for every person

who makes an online purchase

through your unique referral link!

The registered consumers get a unique URL link through which new users can register and make purchases, each referral that makes a purchase will grant the voucher to the original advocate.

13

Figure 13, a prize draw which increases its winnings if the number of participants reaches 150 registrations.

2.3 Critical Assessment of Content Strategy

2.3.1 Information Quality Theory (IQT)

This theory will be used to evaluate the content examples above in order to discern whether the

quality of the information is adequate for the context engagement and referral stimulation.

The first dimension of this theory refers to the credibility of the information source, as a web of stores

across the UK and other regions. Mountain Warehouse’s posts present no verifiability issues unless

the offers in the proposed content plan encounter operational issues and not meet the expectations

stated in the posts. However, the risk for this dimension is low (Grenn, Sarkani and Mazzuchi, 2015).

14

The second dimension of qualitative information quality refers to the ability to relay the message using

an appropriate sequence of information which is displayed rationally and concisely (Grenn, Sarkani

and Mazzuchi, 2015). The posts proposed in section 2.2 contain a large amount of situational

information which will take time and effort for the consumer to read. Thus, the weak coverage might

result in a reduction of the content’s overall engagement, this potentially hampers the plan’s ability

to achieve the SMART objective.

The third aspect of the IQT refers to the subjectivity and bias of the source. Even though the proposed

posts in section 2.2 have an informal tone, no concrete statements are made without the regard of

factual and honest information. Should the information regarding promotion not be objective, the

followers are likely to find out and being spreading negative word of mouth about the brand, which is

difficult to control and recover for the brand as social media is an enabler for conversations which

reach wide audiences and can have detailed criticisms which are trusted and associated with the brand

almost irreversibly. Invalid information is likely to detriment the credibility and engagement of the

brand’s social media content (Grenn, Sarkani and Mazzuchi, 2015).

The fourth criteria of information quality is whether the brand’s communication adheres towards

social norms, values and ethics. No harm is intended to any individuals in the posts proposed by this

plan. Henceforth, this risk is minimized.

The fifth dimension of this theory is the extent to which the information is unique (Grenn, Sarkani and

Mazzuchi, 2015). This is the most significant weakness of the proposed content as the competitors of

Mountain Warehouse also employ giveaways, UGC competitions, partnerships with influencers and

communities, discounts and referral rewards. The uniqueness of the proposed content is purely on

the bases of using unique visuals and semantics. This plan attempted to create unique promotions,

however with many marketing agencies and departments working on creating unique campaigns it

become difficult to achieve the same SMART objectives in a completely unique way. For the use of SIT

in the evaluation, refer to figure 14.

15

2.3.2 Social Impact Theory (SIT)

Social Impact Evaluation

Situational Strength

The campaign uses the week leading up to Christmas and Boxing day to provide a

consistent theme which encourages purchasing gifts for family and friends. The

winter season also adds to the relevance of selling predominantly winter outdoor

apparel and equipment which adds to the contextual relevance of the campaign.

Trans-Situational Strength

The people featured in the proposed content (excluding figure 3) do not have

exceptional physical features hence the strength of the message will not appeal to

people who prefer seeing products on professional models. On the other hand, the

people and images shown have aesthetically pleasing: backgrounds, colours, body

language and facial expressions, relatable appearances along with positive

connotations of travel, adventure, outdoor activities, cold weather, successful

lifestyles, happiness and family values.

Physical Immediacy

The content plan did not apply the physical immediacy of the SIT as the object of

the strategy was to stimulate referrals to the main website. Hence, the SMART

objective made the use of this type of immediacy less feasible. In order to negate

this lack of immediacy, the website could be used to receive vouchers exclusively in

the outlets outlined in figure 5.

Temporal Immediacy

The majority of posts in the content plan were used to create temporal immediacy

through limited timings of offers. However, having one limited offer replace

another reduces the temporal immediacy of the entire content plan put together

but improve the immediacy for those who do not engage consistently.

Social Immediacy

The posts encourage sharing and conversations about the offers, competitions and

giveaways. However no viral trends are created, and an attempt should be made

nonetheless

Number of Sources

The plan proposes 1 post per day with some intervals in order to avoid huge

amounts of information for the followers on Facebook and Instagram. However,

this has a downside as during this week the marketing activity of competitors will

ignore the common boundaries of how many of the same post are shown per day

to a single consumer.

Figure 14, the SIT evaluation of the content plan (Latane, 1981).

16

3. Digital Marketing Analytics

3.1 Key Analytics

This content plan will utilise web analytics tools in order to gather qualitative and quantitative data to

further develop this strategy. For instance, Google Analytics and bit.ly URLs can be used to monitor

the traffic on MW’s website, and where it comes from. With these tools QueryClick will be able to

monitor which platform is most effective at moving traffic towards the webpage (Bekavac and Garbin

Praničević, 2015). Additionally, the engagement and returnee behaviours of the consumers can be

monitored in order to determine whether the plan is performing adequately (Social, 2018). Refer to

figure 15 below for a critically evaluative list of analytics tools which can be applied to this plan. The

most appropriate tools for this plan will be Google Analytics and Bit.ly links.

Analytics Tool Strength Weaknesses Crazy Egg Represents data using heat maps and

other useful features for tracking real-time

traffic

Does not explain conversion rates

Google Analytics Configurable UI, visual metrics for

conversions, flexible formatting, unique

STP mechanics

Does not account for why conversions and

referrals occur

Stuffed Tracker Can discern and show the contrast

between organic and inorganic growth

Requires IT expertise beyond that of a digital

marketer

Webtrends Rich data, heat maps similar to Crazy Egg,

live data

Does not justify its high cost in comparison to

rivals

IBM Unica

NetInsight

Fully configurable

eTracker Mouse-tracking, can gather qualitative

feedback from consumers

FireStats Ergonomic, console for logs and live

information feed

Does not run on regular PCs

Bit.ly Cost-effective, simple Does not have any advanced features, very

basic

Figure 15, Evaluation of various analytics tools for this content plan (Bekavac and Garbin Praničević,

2015).

17

3.2 Tweaks to Content Plan

As shown in figure 14 the situational strength of the plan is adequate, however it can be improved if

another aspect of it is added, such as the post in figure 2 which uses a famous professional skier to

endorse the products with his exclusive story posted on the website in order to boost referrals.

Additionally, the post from figure 3 negates the issue of not holding as much trans-situational message

power as possible, which is already adequate (Latane, 1981).

Figure 16. These original uses of SIT created a very comprehensively balanced array of content, using these examples to also increase the number of sources during the very competitive yet lucrative Christmas season will increase the chances of referrals as the number of active-consumers peaks during this time of year.

18

3.3 Risks of Content Tweaks

Increasing the number of sources can reduce their quality and reduce the engagement levels with

the consumers due to a cognitive overload due to a complicated week of endless need to engage,

the more casual consumers will be repelled by such strong efforts to traffic onto the webpage. Using

models and influencers could harm the existing relationships with the customers who enjoy having

their personal posts shared rather than being disconnected from participation in the community

(Perez-Vega, Waite and O’Gorman, 2016).

19

References

1. Asch, S.E. (1961). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of

judgments. In M. Henle (Ed.), Documents of Gestalt psychology (pp. 222-236). London,

England: Cambridge University Press

2. Bekavac, I. and Garbin Praničević, D. (2015). Web analytics tools and web metrics tools: An

overview and comparative analysis. Croatian Operational Research Review, 6(2), pp.373-386.

3. Bjerke, M. and Renger, R. (2017). Being smart about writing SMART objectives. Evaluation

and Program Planning, 61, pp.125-127.

4. Bourgeois, M. and Bowen, A. (2001). Self-organization of alcohol-related attitudes and

beliefs in a campus housing complex: An initial investigation. Health Psychology, 20(6),

pp.434-437.

5. Charness, G., Haruvy, E. and Sonsino, D. (2007). Social distance and reciprocity: An Internet

experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(1), pp.88-103.

6. eBay. (2019). Electronics, Cars, Fashion, Collectibles, Coupons and More | eBay. [online]

Available at: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Thermal-Base-Layer-Mens-Women-Top-Bottom-

Ski-Shirt-Tights-Wool-Underwear-Set-/272410012467 [Accessed 26 Feb. 2019].

7. Grenn, M., Sarkani, S. and Mazzuchi, T. (2015). A Theory of Information Quality and its

Implementation in Systems Engineering. IEEE Systems Journal, 9(4), pp.1129-1138.

8. Instagram.com. (2019). Mountain Warehouse (@mountainwarehouse) • Instagram photos

and videos. [online] Available at: https://www.instagram.com/mountainwarehouse/?hl=en

[Accessed 26 Feb. 2019].

9. Instagram.com. (2019). SKIINGFREE - freeskiing (@skiingfree) • Instagram photos and videos.

[online] Available at: https://www.instagram.com/skiingfree/ [Accessed 26 Feb. 2019].

10. Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343-356.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343

11. Li, C. and Bernoff, J., 2007. Social technographics. Mapping Participation in Activities Forms

The Foundation Of A Social Strategy.

12. Miller, D., Downs, J. and Prentice, D. (1998). Minimal conditions for the creation of a unit

relationship: the social bond between birthday mates. European Journal of Social

Psychology, 28(3), pp.475-481.

13. Mountainwarehouse.com. (2019). Outdoor Clothing & Equipment | Mountain Warehouse

GB. [online] Available at: https://www.mountainwarehouse.com/ [Accessed 26 Feb. 2019].

20

14. Pedersen, E., LaBrie, J. and Lac, A. (2008). Assessment of perceived and actual alcohol norms

in varying contexts: Exploring Social Impact Theory among college students. Addictive

Behaviors, 33(4), pp.552-564.

15. Perez-Vega, R., Waite, K. and O'Gorman, K. (2016). Social impact theory: An examination of

how immediacy operates as an influence upon social media interaction in Facebook fan

pages. The Marketing Review, 16(3), pp.299-321.

16. Rosette, A., Brett, J., Barsness, Z. and Lytle, A. (2011). When Cultures Clash Electronically.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(4), pp.628-643.

17. Svindal (2019). Aksel Lund Svindal. [online] Aksellundsvindal.com. Available at:

http://www.aksellundsvindal.com/ [Accessed 26 Feb. 2019].

18. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model of Social Behavior. Advances

in Experimental Social Psychology, pp.181-227.

19. Trope, Y. and Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance.

20. Valenzuela, S., Park, N. and Kee, K. (2009). Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?:

Facebook Use and College Students' Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation. Journal of

Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), pp.875-901.

21. van Doorn, J., Lemon, K., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P. and Verhoef, P. (2010).

Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions. Journal

of Service Research, 13(3), pp.253-266.

21

Appendices

Appendix 1, Honeycomb of Social Media Framework Analysis (Kietzmann et al., 2011)

Honeycomb Quadrant Evaluation

Identity

This quadrant constitutes to which extent consumers disclose their personal

information and identities within the context of social media.

Benefits

 Data mining this information is useful for brands when segmenting and

targeting their desired consumers (Kietzmann and Angell, 2010).

 Kaplan and Haenlein (2010) propose that interaction with social media

unintentionally provides brands with feedback through every type of OCE

such as liking, commenting, rating and responding to content.

 Consumers can also utilise and self-promote their real or virtual identities

on social media; this can be seen on Mountain Warehouse’s Instagram

Page (Kietzmann and Angell, 2010).

Limitations

 However, the information which consumers reveal on social media is

protected by their privacy settings and breaching their trust by accessing

it without their consent could damage the trust they have with their social

media platforms and the third parties which are found to purchase such

information (Kietzmann and Angell, 2010).

 Kravets (2010) found that breaches of privacy can also lead to lawsuits.

Hence, precaution should be taken in the analytic and strategic sections

of this content plan.

Each social media platform provides its own unique style of data on its users; this

content plan will focus on the data provided by its Facebook and Instagram

followers and target segments in section 3.

22

Honeycomb Quadrant Evaluation

Conversations

This section of the model depicts the degree of communication between social

media users, these discussions can revolve purely around the brand and its

offerings. Hence, brands aim to monitor and control these conversations to act

accordingly with their corporate interests, brand reputation and brand identity

(Kietzmann et al., 2011).

Benefits:

 Conversations are easily facilitated by platforms such as Instagram and

Facebook (Kietzmann et al., 2011).

 Such discussions can promote the brand through positive “word of

mouth” of individuals on the basis of trust and conformity (Beirut, 2009).

 For instance, Unilever’s Dove 2004 campaign was successful at creating

positive conversations about the brand by engaging the community with

a live vote to describe whether or not the product produced a positive

result on its customers shown on Dove’s billboards.

 Positivist findings: thousands of social media conversations can be

effectively deciphered by brands through the use of specific filtering tools

to find strong and relevant trends amongst the attitudes of users.

 Interpretivist findings: Brands can also communicate directly with its

customers and view the interactions on their pages for a more detailed

but less connected or representative perspective on their reputation.

Limitations:

 Conversations are difficult to decipher because:

- They have subjective meanings, for instance they can have

sarcastic tones which filtering tools cannot identify.

- They can be prone to rapid changes in their direction, frequency

and content (McCarthy et al., 2010).

 Conversations are difficult to incite and control, the brand’s decisions

must be relevant to the context in order to avoid the risk of damaging its

image.

23

Honeycomb Quadrant Evaluation

Sharing

This quadrant represents the frequency of content exchange which occurs

between users. Social media networks create a conducive environment towards

the distribution and reception of content, the shared content acts as a powerful

tool to create and maintain social exchanges (Engelström, 2005).Brands are

required to determine new or existing social cues which can be used to bring users

together into social interactions and nourish their relationships.

Benefits:

 Brands can incentivise their customers to share their messages and

content by rewarding them with special offers.

For example, Groupon offered discounts to groups which were willing to

buy products and services which are part of those promotional offers.

 Shared content incites conversations between social media users, this can

be used to stimulate brand-related discussions.

 Sharing is one of the key drivers of social media, consumers can share their

brand experiences indefinitely which can create a multiplier effect which

raises awareness and improves brand image if the message is positive.

Limitations:

 Brands need to be able to provide socially relevant content which is

difficult to identify as its effectiveness is subjective and can easily be

unsuccessful in creating engagement

 It can be costly to create strong incentives to share content such as

worthwhile promotions.

 There is a lot of noise regarding offers and other incentives to share,

brands are required to stand out in their propositions.

 Shared content can contain negative connotations which can damage the

brand on a scale larger than it can be able to resolve, what consumers

share is a big risk for the public relations of a brand.

24

Honeycomb Quadrant Evaluation

Presence

This component of the model represents how accessible other users are within

the social network. Such accessibility involves users maintaining awareness of

each other’s physical locations as well as their online availability.

Benefits:

 Facebook gives insight into the physical locations and online availability of

its users which facilitates their interactions while allowing brands to

profile and target them more effectively.

 Knowing the virtual and physical presence of the brand’s consumers will

help facilitate “real-time communication” which vastly improves the

quality of the interaction through higher levels of immediacy and intimacy

(Kaplan and Haenlein, 2010).

 This quadrant enhances the effectiveness of the “relationship” and the

“conversations” quadrants.

Limitations:

 The accessibility of users cannot be manipulated nor predicted on a large

scale. Hence, if it is low then this quadrant cannot be utilised effectively.

 Communication may not result in the intended impact the brand aimed

for, adequate skills are required to utilise real time communication.

 Focusing on this quadrant gives little choice when paring with quadrants

other than its relationship and conversation counterparts (Kietzmann et

al., 2011).

25

Honeycomb Quadrant Evaluation

Relationships

This honeycomb segment determines the level of connectedness between social

media users. This “connectedness” leads to the sharing of content, conversations,

real-life meets as well as a friend or follower status on social media.

Benefits:

 “Influencers” can utilise their social power in dense and large networks

to promote brands (Granovetter, 1973).

 Relationships can be created by displaying relevant content towards the

expectations of consumers (Borgatti and Foster, 2003).

 Once a brand creates a relationship with its customers, the customer is

more likely to engage with the content and loyally accept the majority of

offers provided by the brand.

 Relationships create a willingness to be more engaged with social media

content.

Limitations:

 Users have expectations from brands when brands attempt to create

relationships, these expectations are not overtly communicated hence

the brand risks not meeting them and producing a negative impression

on its audience.

 Relationships are complex to create and maintain, they require social

understanding which is both detailed and representative of the target

segment.

26

Honeycomb Quadrant Evaluation

Reputation

This quadrant represents how recognisable, trustworthy and respectable the

brand is. Facebook and Instagram evaluate the reputation of the page and its

content through likes and followers. This content plan will value indicators of how

engaged the consumers are with the social media posts in order to persuade them

into going to the main website.

Benefits:

 An accessible and simplistic indication of how popular a social media

page is on the bases of ratings, shares, comments and followers.

 Software can be used to filter UGC across multiple social media

platforms to find how many times a brand is mentioned by the entire

community and by each user, whether the mentions are positive or

negative as well as the conversations which result from this content.

Limitations:

 The indicators of engagement can be falsified or be subjectively

interpreted to be wrong

Groups

This social media block determines how many users form and join groups and

communities of like-minded individuals. Typically a single consumer can actively

engage with around 150 people in totality on social media (Dunbar, 1992),

however communities on Facebook and Instagram have actively-engaged

communities which have followings way beyond this limit.

Benefits:

 Groups are entities which can be used to communicate with a large

number of people by brands, these members can be influenced

efficiently and effectively.

 Members of communities share particular characteristics which can be

identified and targeted by brands.

 Groups are effective sources of feedback.

Limitations:

 Groups are difficult to manage and can be an influential source of

negative brand connotations.

27

Appendix 2, applying the “Groups Quadrant” from the “Honeycomb Model”: examples

of Social Media Community Partnerships (Instagram, 2019)

SKI APPAREL?

“Skiingfree” is a large community of passionate skiers around the world which is open to

negotiate partnerships with brands. They currently have ski gear on promotion however no

skiing apparel is being promoted leaving an opportunity to raise awareness with its

members. The proposed content would introduce the members to the MW brand in hopes

of persuading these consumers to browse the website for any promoted gear they might

need for their outdoor lifestyle.

28

Appendix 3, the “Ladder of Engagement and Segmentation” (Li and Bernoff, 2007)

EN G

A G

EM EN

T

Creators

Conversationalists

Critics

Collectors

Joiners

Spectators

Inactives

This content plan will aim to increase the online consumer engagement of MW’s followers and the targeted online

communities in order to ease communication. Once a relationship is established then the persuasive content will

stimulate: ratings; comments; conversations; sharing and mostly importantly – referrals to the website.

1. “Travel, camping or skiing” bloggers, influencers and UGC creators.

2. Opinion sharing individuals with many strong relationships.

3. Those who evaluate offerings through likes, comments and other responses.

4. Post savers, taggers, sharers.

5. Passive social media followers and visitors.

6. Passive browsers, readers, viewers of regular and critical content/feedback.

7. No significant engagement with social media content.

29

Appendix 4, the Content Calendar

Date Timing Channels Post Title Summary Source Planned Engagement

19/12/19 22:00 Instagram,

Facebook

Stay warmer

with your

loved ones this

Xmas

20% discount,

refer friend and

receive £10

voucher for online

purchases

Mountain

Warehouse

Sharing the link to the

discounts, visiting the

webpage to view

prices.

21/12/19 14:00 Instagram,

Facebook

Register on our

webpage to

get a chance to

win prizes!

Users enter a

random draw to

win prizes of their

choosing valued at

under £100

(clothing or

equipment)

Getting more

people in the draw

increases the

value of the prize

to £250

123rf.com Sharing, visiting and

registering,

involvement in the

draw and eagerness

to win.

23/12/19 11:00AM Instagram,

Facebook

Haven’t figured

out what to get

for your family

and friends this

Xmas?

Submit your best

winter photo for

a chance to win

an 80% discount

off your next

online purchase

at Mountain

Warehouse!

Gettyimages Participation in UGC

competition, sharing

of uploaded content

and conversation

starter, no concrete

reason to criticise the

brand.

30

Date Timing Channels Post Title Summary Source Planned engagement

24/12/19 22:00 Instagram,

Facebook

Winner of

the UGC

competition

post

See our top 25

best submitted

pictures at our

website as well

as the

upcoming

clearance sales

on Boxing Day!

Users Interest to see if the

uploaded picture was

featured on the website,

as well as interest to see

which items have

clearance sales, referral,

sharing if featured.

26/12/19 8:00AM Instagram,

Facebook

Boxing day

sale

List of items on

sale, with

discounts next

to each type

Pinterest Referral to the website,

sharing, conversations.

31

Appendix 5 Digital Marketing Analytics

Analytics Tool Strength Weaknesses Crazy Egg Represents data using heat maps and

other useful features for tracking real-time

traffic

Does not explain conversion rates

Google Analytics Configurable UI, visual metrics for

conversions, flexible formatting, unique

STP mechanics

Does not account for why conversions and

referrals occur

Stuffed Tracker Can discern and show the contrast

between organic and inorganic growth

Requires IT expertise beyond that of a digital

marketer

Webtrends Rich data, heat maps similar to Crazy Egg,

live data

Does not justify its high cost in comparison to

rivals

IBM Unica

NetInsight

Fully configurable

eTracker Mouse-tracking, can gather qualitative

feedback from consumers

FireStats Ergonomic, console for logs and live

information feed

Does not run on regular PCs

Bit.ly Cost-effective, simple Does not have any advanced features, very

basic