Group project 2

profileYuk
ExampleofBinaryLogisticRegressionResultReporting1.docx

Example of Binary Logistic Regression in SPSS with one independent and one dependent variable

Research Question

Our research question is: to what extent does political party affiliation predict the respondents’ having gun in home

Hypotheses

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no statistically significant relationship between political party affiliation and having gun in home?

Alternative Hypothesis (HA): There is statistically significant relationship between political party affiliation and having gun in home?

Variables

Independent Variables (IV):

partyid — political party affiliation, measured as categorical, where 0 = Strong Democrat, 1 = Not Strong Democrat, 2 = Independent Near Democrat, 3 = Independent, 4 = Independent Near Republican, 5 = Not Strong Republican’ 6 = Strong Republican, and 7 = Other Party.

Dependent Variables (DV):

Owngun — have gun in home, where 1 = Yes; 2 = No. Prior to conducting the analysis, the variable “owngun” was recoded as 0 = No and 1 = Yes.

Results

The average age of participants is 49.37 ( SD = 19.143) (Table 1).

Table 1

Descriptives Statistics for Age of Respondents

Statistic

Std. Error

AGE OF RESPONDENT

Mean

49.37

.662

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Lower Bound

48.07

Upper Bound

50.67

5% Trimmed Mean

49.03

Median

49.00

Variance

293.879

Std. Deviation

17.143

Minimum

18

Maximum

89

Range

71

Interquartile Range

27

Skewness

.226

.094

Kurtosis

-.781

.188

Regression results

At the model level, the results showed the Nagelkerke R square to be .111, which means that 11.1% of the variability in having gun in home is explained by political party affiliation (See Table 2). The analysis showed that political party affiliation was significantly associated with having gun in home ꭕ2(7) = 36.010, p < .001 (See Table 3).

Table 2

Model Summary

Step

-2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1

501.181a

.077

.111

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Table 3

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square

df

Sig.

Step 1

Step

36.010

7

.000

Block

36.010

7

.000

Model

36.010

7

.000

At the variable level, the results showed that the odds of having gun at home are 2.6 times higher for “Independent Near Republican” political party affiliation than “Strong Democrat” political party affiliation. The confidence interval showed that we are 95% confident that the odds-ratio in the population falls between 1.151 and 5.876. Likewise, the odds of having gun at home are 6.627 times higher for “Strong Republican” political party affiliation than “Strong Democrat” political party affiliation. The confidence interval showed that we are 95% confident that the odds-ratio in the population falls between 2.890 and 15.199 (See Table 4).

Table 4

Variables in the Equation

B

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp(B)

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower

Upper

Step 1a

POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION

34.213

7

.000

POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION(1)

-.059

.379

.024

1

.876

.943

.449

1.981

POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION(2)

.438

.410

1.144

1

.285

1.550

.694

3.461

POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION(3)

-.076

.390

.038

1

.846

.927

.432

1.990

POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION(4)

.956

.416

5.277

1

.022

2.600

1.151

5.876

POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION(5)

.617

.409

2.281

1

.131

1.854

.832

4.130

POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION(6)

1.891

.423

19.944

1

.000

6.627

2.890

15.199

POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION(7)

1.341

.758

3.133

1

.077

3.824

.866

16.884

Constant

-1.341

.272

24.239

1

.000

.262

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION.