Worksheet 2
Logic Model for Interdisciplinary Team on Intensive Care Unit A
Evaluation: Interdisciplinary Team on Intensive Care Unit A
Situation: Examine team effectiveness in meeting patient outcome benchmarks for length of stay (LOS) in an intensive care unit.
Current data show that the LOS is 2.5 days longer than national averages. Evaluate the team to determine why the team is not meeting national benchmarks.
protocols.
Assumptions: High functioning multidisciplinary teams can provide comprehen‐
sive cost‐effective care. LOS can be facilitated by input of all team members using protocols based on EBP to move patients in a timely manner from one level of care to the next.
External Factors: Reimbursement for care is tied to LOS; longer than
average LOS are not reimbursed by some insurers and create a huge burden on the health care facility to absorb those costs. EBPs can decrease LOS, if followed.
|
|
Outputs |
|
Outcomes ‐ Impact |
|
|
|
Inputs |
Activities |
Participation |
Short |
Medium |
Long (Impact) |
|
Multidisciplinary team |
Conduct meeting to focus |
Leadership |
Awareness of barriers. |
Leadership satisfied with |
High performance |
|
(MDs, NPs, RT, |
evaluation. |
|
|
changes. |
multidisciplinary |
|
PharmD). |
|
Leadership of |
Removal of barriers. |
|
team. |
|
|
Meet to discuss work |
multidisciplinary team. |
|
Improved function of |
|
|
Time devoted for rounds. |
processes of patient |
|
Education of |
multidisciplinary team. |
Increased esteem of |
|
|
management to |
Members of each |
multidisciplinary team. |
|
multidisciplinary |
|
Combined EMR and |
move patients across |
discipline in team. |
|
Average LOS met or |
team. |
|
paper for writing orders |
continuum of care. |
|
New attitudes and |
LOS less than national |
|
|
and progress notes). |
|
Multidisciplinary team. |
awareness. |
average. |
Increased |
|
|
Observe conduct of |
|
|
|
satisfaction of |
|
Leadership who wants |
rounds, flow of |
Nursing staff and support |
Knowledge about EBP |
Integration of EBPs and |
team members, |
|
improved outcomes. |
information, and |
staff (transcriber of |
and best practices. |
best practices. |
staff, and |
|
|
interactions. |
orders, other |
|
|
patients/families. |
|
Strong organizational |
|
departments). |
Revision of process |
Policies, procedures, and |
|
|
commitment to |
Meetings to discuss flow. |
|
maps for transfer and |
protocols followed. |
Sustained cost |
|
evidence‐based |
|
Nursing staff. |
discharge. |
|
savings from |
|
practice (EBP) with |
Observe work patterns |
|
|
Better communications. |
shorter LOS. |
|
resource support. |
related to transfer/ |
Written policies, |
Facilitator to help improve |
|
|
|
|
discharge. |
procedures, and |
group communications, |
Cost savings from shorter |
Better overall |
|
Data on LOS. |
|
protocols. |
trust, mutual respect, |
LOS. |
patient |
|
|
Review protocols for |
|
and common goals. |
|
outcomes. |
|
Available national data |
admission and |
|
|
|
|
|
for similar academic |
discharge from unit. |
|
Revision of policies, |
|
|
|
medical centers. |
|
|
procedures, and |
|
|