question
N900
Results
The purpose
of this review of literature is to examine various methods of provider
educational training regarding respectful maternity care(RMC) and associated impact on patient
care. The studies found were performed in various parts of the world with one each in Gha
na,
England
, Tanzania
, and two each in Ethiopia and India.
All seven studies
specified the
number of
providers
as participants
and five also
included
patients
.
The studies also
included the type of
provider (i.e., anesthesiology, midwifery, obstetrics)
, ex
cept for one.
The studies reviewed
focused on provider
-
specific interventions for improving or initiating RMC.
Outcom
es were measured in various ways across the studies
.
Measurements
used
included analyzed participant notes, quizzes,
Self
-
Childbirth
Chec
klist
SCC
)
(
,
p
erson
-
c
entered
m
aternity
care s
cale
,
overall assessment of
hospital practices and ecosystem, and survey
s.
Interviews and group discussions werealso commonly used in combination with various studies.
The
SCC
, a validated tool, was only used to measure privacy during birth and if a companion
was offered.
The
person
-
centered maternity care scale
is a validated tool with 30 items and three
subscales for dignity and respect, communication and autonomy, and suppor
tive care.
Only 24
items were used in theassociated study.
Table 3 demonstrates data extraction and the main
findings of each study.
Interventions
were classified by educational styles
(
visual, auditory, kinesthetic,
reading/writing), length (short, inter
mediate, long)
and if
RMC
was integrated into a study, or
studied independently
.
Education
al
Styles
EXAMPLE
-
DO
NOT
COPY
OR
SHARE
Throughout the studies, different styles of education were classified to allow for
comparison. Styles included
reading and writing, kinesthetic (actively doing or practicing the
intervention), auditory
(
listening, discussing),
and visual (diagrams, pictures, videos).
Specifically, interventions providing examples of disrespectful care and using transformative
lear
ning to create realistic clinical situations proved to be impactful. Cooperative learning and
multidimensional learning were shown to be effective in creating change (Afulani, 2018;
Swordy, 2020;
Taneja, 2021;
Wilson
-
Mitchell, 2018).
One study incorporated
all aspects of
learning and was able to show change in all domains of RMC, although not statistically
significant (p=0.08; Asefa, 2020).
Reading and Writing
F
our
studies used reading and writing as learning styles.
Methods included readings,
participant
reflection, writing notes about videos, and reading posted job aides.
Asefa (2020)
specifically created a manual about RMC as a long
-
term resource.
Sharma (202
1
)
and Taneja
(2021)
utilized
posted informational sheets and job aids
throughout the unit.
Instead of reading
about information, Swordy (2020), used writing as a method of reflection and expression during
a video clip intervention.
Kinesthetic
Five studies included kinesthetics
in various forms to simulate RMC
.
Two studies
utilized skills sess
ions
(
(
Afulani, 2018; Mengistu, 2021) and another two, role play
Asefa
,
2020
;
Wilson
-
Mitchell, 2018)
. Sharma (2021)
was structured as
plan
-
do
-
study
-
act (PDSA)
cycles
performed on a labor unit, so participants were constantly practicing and improving RMC sk
ills.
Afulani (2018) focused on
simulation of stressful maternity care situations
and found them
effective in creating positive change to RMC over a 6
-
month period (p<0.001).
EXAMPLE
-
DO
NOT
COPY
OR
SHARE
Auditory
All seven studies used a form of auditory learning. F
ive
used a style
of discussion during
or after the intervention
(
Asefa, 2020; Mengistu, 2021; Sharma, 2021; Swordy; 2020; Wilson
-
Mitchell, 2018)
.
Afulani (2018) included a learning module presentation. Throughout one study,
monthly mentorship meetings were established to d
iscuss,
assess,
and evaluate interventions
(
Taneja,
2021).
Through PDSA cycles previously discussed, ongoing conversation and
sensitization of RMC created significant change in RMC with 93% of providers obtaining
consent before examination compared with 47
% prior (Sharma, 2021).
One study focused on the
intellectual partnership model of encouraging education to be dynamic with the teacher and
learner to promote more discussion, cooperative learning, and empowerment. Participants were
able to increase quiz r
esults by 20% post
-
intervention (Wilson
-
Mitchell, 2018).
Visual
Five studies included visual learning with
four
of these showing a type of video
(
Asefa,
; Mengistu, 2021; Swordy, 2020; Wilson
2020
-
Mitchell, 2018).
Videos were the focus of two
studies and specifically focused on providing realistic scenarios of disrespectful care
(
p<0.001 in
one district)
and reported patient experiences, respectively. Both studies had positive feedback
regarding the emotional aspects of such videos and subseque
nt push for change to more
respectful care felt from participants (Mengistu, 2021; Swordy, 2020).
Another intervention used
were anatomically marked scrubs that were worn by models
(
Afulani,
2018).
Length
of Training
Length of educational training was fou
nd to have an impact on data collection and long
-
term sustainability of RMC. Short
-
term trainings were effective for situational awareness of
RMC. Longer
-
term trainings were able to evaluate impact of RMC
with patients and providers.
EXAMPLE
-
DO
NOT
COPY
OR
SHARE
With education, impact
is often not immediately found, and sustainability is a valuable
component.
Brief
Amongst the studies,
t
wo
only covered short
-
term outcomes and were brief in length.
Swordy (2019) and Wilson
-
Mitchell (2018)
consisted of
one
-
and
two
-
day training workshops
,
respectively. These studies did not evaluate long
-
term impacts of RMC and focused more on
increasing
knowledge rather than practice change
. Qualitatively, they did get positive feedback
from participants regarding increased empowerment and empathy.
Intermediate
T
hree
studies were of intermediate length of 8 weeks
, 2 months, and
5
months,
respectively (Sharma, 2021;
Asefa, 2020;
Afulani, 201
8).
These studies were able to provide an
opportunity for repetition at some point in the study either through a refresher, focus group
discussion, or continued PDSA cycles.
Extended
The remaining two studies were over a longer period of 27 months and 24
months,
respectively (Mengistu, 2021; Taneja, 2021).
Repetition was also used in the form of PDSA
cycles, coaching visits,
and mentorship opportunities
. Mengistu (2021) found significant long
-
term change in two of the three districts (p<0.001, p=0.002). Ta
neja (2021) was able to integrate
RMC into
a long
-
term QI project with shown improved patient outcomes which will next be
discussed.
Integration vs Independence
RMC is not a singular intervention to care that can be introduced without discussion of
other aspects of labor and birth.
Four studies studied RMC on an independent level. These
EXAMPLE
-
DO
NOT
COPY
OR
SHARE
studies lacked long
-
term results and consistently cited improvements with prov
iders
understanding RMC on an emotional and empathetic level. While there were improvements in
knowledge of RMC and recognition of disrespectful care, long
-
term retention was unknown
(
Asefa, 2020; Sharma, 2021; Swordy, 2020; Wilson
-
Mitchell, 2018).
Three
studies examined RMC in connection with another aspect of maternity care.
Mengistu (2021) and Taneja (2021) integrated RMC into quality improvement projects
addressing other aspects of care. Afulani (2018)
used high
-
anxiety and stressful obstetric
situati
ons to make training more realistic for participants. This included an emotional
aspect but
was also shown to be more effective for retention of RMC.
Although, education regarding what RMC is and increased awareness of abuse and
disrespect are
valuable components to improving patient outcomes, long
-
term change requires
more. Integrated trainings with other aspects of maternal health allow learning to be more
realistic and therefore sustainable.
Discussion
Overall Findings
This systematic review
found
educational interventions with providers
about
RMC w
ere
impactful and effective in increasing respect and compassion. Providers reported increased
personal awareness
, knowledge regarding RMC
and
improved relationships with patients.
For
training to
be most effective, it should include various types of learning and specifically some
level of kinesthetic learning where participants can practice providing RMC. Education should
occur over
time
and include refreshers or mentorship opportunities to reinfor
ce concepts. RMC
should also be discussed in context with other aspects of maternity care since it is not a specific
intervention, but an overall practice change present in all aspects of care.
EXAMPLE
-
DO
NOT
COPY
OR
SHARE
Limitations
There were several limitations in this review.
All seven studies used convenience
sampling and relied on provider willingness to participate in educational intervention.
None
of
the studies
had randomization or
a
control group for ethical reasons.
Most of the studies did not
have a robust statistical a
nalysis, so it was unknown if results with positive outcomes were
statistically significant (Taneja, 2021; Wilson
-
Mitchel, 2018
;
Sharma, 2021).
Only one study had
blinding with
the intervention done (
Swordy, 2020
)
. Most studies were not largely impacted by
lack of blinding, but
Afulani
had non
(2018)
-
blinded,
in
-
person interviews
, that
could have been
biased.
There were only
two studies
with
a large sample size (Mengistu, 2021; Taneja, 2021)
.
Taneja (2021) had different baseline and endline assessments and
Afulani (2018) had different
baseline and endline samples.
As discussed earlier, three studies had a s
hort implementation
period
(
A
sefa,
2020
;
Swordy,
2020
;
Wilson
-
Mitchell
, 2018).
Only two studies used a replicable
and validated tool (Afulani, 2018; Mengi
stu, 2021).
Tools used were the person
-
centered
maternity care scale and
SCC
.
More research is needed to evaluate which is of more use with
RMC evaluation. Since the most long
-
term data was only over two
years,
it is also difficult to
determine RMC’s true
impact on maternal morbidity and mortality.
Practice Recommendation
This review suggests that RMC education increases provider knowledge, awareness,
compassion
,
and communication. It is unclear if RMC has an impact on patient
outcomes but
results thus far are supportive of future successes. Education should be integrated
with other
maternal health topics
and
done
by using various methods of learning
to increase
the likelihood
of retention
.
It is best to assess future success
of
interventions over a longer
period
with
intermediate refreshers on
learned
information
provided
. It is unclear which validated scale
EXAMPLE
-
DO
NOT
COPY
OR
SHARE
should be used
to
assess overall need of RMC, but it is
recommended to use one.
Summary
Disrespectful care
i
s clearly contributing to maternal morbidity and mortality on a global
level. Research is still new on educational interventions and best practice for incorporation
is
unknown
.
RMC cannot be learned qu
ickly or casually. It requires effort from the educator and
learner
to make lasting and sustainable change
r
e
garding the
culture of maternity care globally.
Lower resource countries are at a disadvantage to having multi
f
aceted education
due to lack of
avai
lable resources
. Efforts should be made on a global level to improve respect given to birthing
persons.
To start, providers need to be personally aware of the quality of care they give and the
impact it has on patient outcomes.
More research will be needed
discussing best practice
for
RMC
provider
education in all settings and areas of the world.
EXAMPLE
-
DO
NOT
COPY
OR
SHARE
References
Afulani, P. A., Aborigo, R. A., Walker, D., Moyer, C. A., Cohen, S., & Williams, J. (2018). Can
an integrated obstetric emergency simulation training improve maternity care? Results
from a pilot study in Ghana.
Birth
,
46
, 523
-
532
. https://doi.org/10.1111/b
irt.12418
Asefa, A., Morgan, A.,
Bohren, M.
,
& Kermode, M. (2020).
Lessons learned through respectful
maternity care training and its implementation in Ethiopia: An interventional mixed
methods study
.
Reproductive Health
,
17
(
103
)
.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s
12978
-
020
-
00953
-
4
Mengistu, B., Alemu, H., Kassa, M., Zelalem, M., Abate, M., Bitewulign, B., Mathewos, K.,
Njoku, K., Prose, N. S., & Maggie, H. (2021). An innovative intervention to improve
respectful maternity carein three Districts in Ethiopia.
BMC P
regnancy and Childbirth
,
21
(541)
. https://doi.org/10.1186/s
12884
-
021
-
03934
-
y
Sharma, B., Sikka, P., Arora, A., Assi, G. S., Suri, V. (2021). A quality improvement study on
improving communication between health
-
care provider and laboring woman: A step
toward respectful maternity care.
Indian Journal of Community Medicine
,
46
52
,
(3)
4
-
527.
Swordy, A., Noble, L. M., Bourne, T., Van Lessen, L., & Lokugamage, A. U. (2020). Footprints
of birth: An innovative educational intervention foregrounding women’s voices to
improve empathy and reflective practice in maternity care.
JCEHP
,
40
(3)
.
ht
tps://
doi.org/
10.1097/CEH.0000000000000302
Taneja, G., Sarin, E., Bajpayee, D., Chaudhuri, S., Verma, G., Parashar, R., Chaudhry, N.,
Swarup Mohanty, J., Bisht, N., Gupta, A., Singh Tomar, S., Patel, R., Sridhar, V. S.,
Joshi, A., Rathi, C., Baswal, D., Gu
pta, S., & Gera, R. (2021). Care around birth
EXAMPLE
-
DO
NOT
COPY
OR
SHARE
approach: A training, mentoring, and quality improvement model to optimize intrapartum
and immediate postpartum quality of care in India.
Global Health: Science and Practice
,
9
(3)
. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP
-
D
-
20
-
00368
Wilson
-
Mitchell, K., Robinson, J., & Sharpe, M. (2018). Teaching respectful maternity care
using an intellectual partnership model in Tanzania.
Midwifery
,
60
, 27
-
29
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.01.019
EXAMPLE
-
DO
NOT
COPY
OR
SHARE